Literature DB >> 31538270

Low conversion rates toward total hip arthroplasty after hemiarthroplasty in patients under 75 years of age.

P P Schmitz1, J L C van Susante2, M P Somford2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: An intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck is frequent in the elderly. Patients can be treated with either total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty. There is a continuous discussion about the treatment in elderly patients who are still healthy, active and mentally untroubled. A potential consequence of hemiarthroplasty, especially in the relatively young elderly, could be conversion to total hip arthroplasty. The conversion rate must be acceptable, and clinical outcome must be sufficient to justify the treatment with hemiarthroplasty in this group of patients. This study evaluates the conversion rate of hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty and clinical outcome in patients under 75 years of age.
METHODS: This study identified 248 patients, younger than 75 years at time of operation, with a fracture of the femoral neck treated with hemiarthroplasty. Patient-reported outcome measurements (VAS pain during rest and activity and WOMAC) were assessed by telephone interviews. Furthermore, radiographic evaluation for the presence of acetabular wear was performed.
RESULTS: At a follow-up of 5.1 (0.9-9.6) years, the conversion rate was 7.3%. Mean VAS pain in rest was 0.89 (0-10), the mean VAS pain during activity was 2.2 (0-10), and the WOMAC showed a mean of 16.51 (0-64). At time of follow-up, 38.7% of patients had died. Radiographic evaluation of the unrevised group showed in one patient signs of acetabulum wear.
CONCLUSION: Hemiarthroplasty in the relatively young elderly after a fracture of the femoral neck demonstrates an acceptable conversion rate. Furthermore, unrevised patients show low complaints of pain. To prevent one conversion to total hip arthroplasty, 13.7 patients should be treated with total hip arthroplasty that will not undergo a conversion at a later stage. Therefore, hemiarthroplasty remains a viable treatment of femoral neck fractures in relatively young patients. There seems to be no space for standardized decision making concerning the choice of treatment. An individual approach is required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conversion; Femoral neck fractures; Hemiarthroplasty; Under 75 years

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31538270     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-019-02498-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  19 in total

1.  Total hip replacement and hemiarthroplasty in mobile, independent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck: a seven- to ten-year follow-up report of a prospective randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  P P Avery; R P Baker; M J Walton; J C Rooker; B Squires; M F Gargan; G C Bannister
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-08

2.  Valuing health status using VAS and TTO: what lies behind the numbers?

Authors:  A Robinson; P Dolan; A Williams
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Mapping visual analogue scale health state valuations onto standard gamble and time trade-off values.

Authors:  P Dolan; M Sutton
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

Authors:  N Bellamy; W W Buchanan; C H Goldsmith; J Campbell; L W Stitt
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 5.  Hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty in recent femoral neck fractures?

Authors:  Olivier Guyen
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 2.256

6.  Patient-reported outcome after displaced femoral neck fracture: a national survey of 4467 patients.

Authors:  Olof Leonardsson; Ola Rolfson; Ami Hommel; Göran Garellick; Kristina Åkesson; Cecilia Rogmark
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Satisfactory cross cultural equivalence of the Dutch WOMAC in patients with hip osteoarthritis waiting for arthroplasty.

Authors:  L D Roorda; C A Jones; M Waltz; G J Lankhorst; L M Bouter; J W van der Eijken; W J Willems; I C Heyligers; D C Voaklander; K D Kelly; M E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Thompson hemiarthroplasty and acetabular erosion.

Authors:  T W Phillips
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The natural history of the hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Michel P J van den Bekerom; Inger N Sierevelt; Harmjan Bonke; Ernst L F B Raaymakers
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty in 30,830 patients with hip fractures: data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register on revision and risk factors for revision.

Authors:  Sophie Moerman; Nina M C Mathijssen; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Anne J H Vochteloo; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  2 in total

1.  High conversion rate to total hip arthroplasty after hemiarthroplasty in young patients with a minimum 10 years follow-up.

Authors:  Nam Hoon Moon; Won Chul Shin; Min Uk Do; Sang Woo Kang; Sang-Min Lee; Kuen Tak Suh
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Is Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgery More Aggressive than Hemiarthroplasty when Treating Femoral Neck Fracture in the Elderly? A Multicentric Retrospective Study on 302 Hips.

Authors:  Marco Rotini; Luca Farinelli; Leonardo Natalini; Federico De Rosa; Rocco Politano; Marco Cianforlini; Emanuele Pacetti; Roberto Procaccini; Fabiana Magrini Pasquinelli; Antonio Gigante
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.