Literature DB >> 29983171

Hip fractures in the non-elderly-Who, why and whither?

Cecilia Rogmark1, Morten Tange Kristensen2, Bjarke Viberg3, Sebastian Strøm Rönnquist4, Søren Overgaard5, Henrik Palm6.   

Abstract

Nonelderly hip fracture patients have gathered little scientific attention, and our understanding of the group may be biased by patient case-mix and lack of follow-up. Preconceptions may thwart adequate investigation of bone health and other comorbidities. This literature review focusses on who these patients between 20 and 60 years are, how to treat them and how to evaluate the outcome. 2-11% of the hip fractures occur in non-elderly, equally common in men and women. Every second to forth patient smoke, have chronic diseases, and abuse alcohol. Poor self-rated health, sleep disturbances, low cognitive function and education are associated with increased hip fracture risk in young adults. Bone health is poorly investigated, but literature suggest young patients to have lower bone mineral density regardless of trauma mechanism. Studies contradict on whether surgery within 8-12 h reduce the risk of avascular necrosis in femoral neck fractures (FNF). Based on rationality, surgery ought to be performed promptly, in order to reduce pain and permit rehabilitation. There is no convincing support from the existing literature to use open reduction. Good reduction is mandatory, preferably using a closed reduction technique. The failure rate following internal fixation of displaced FNF in younger patients can be as high as 59%. In some cases a displaced FNF is better treated with a primary arthroplasty; in case of rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis for example. Complications after extracapsular fractures vary from 6 to 23%. The relatively few studies looking at functional outcome in non-elderly use a multitude of outcome measures, precluding comparisons. Many non-elderly patients seem not to fully recover. While some non-elderly hip fracture patients are healthy individuals sustaining high energy trauma, others have low-energy fractures and comorbidities including reduced bone strength (either as a primary or secondary condition). i.e. non-delaying medical optimization, proper surgical technique, bone health investigation and secondary fracture prevention is necessary. Younger hip fracture patients are at risk of permanent loss of function, and negative socioeconomic and psychological consequences. High-energy trauma does not exclude the presence of osteopenia. A hip fracture in adulthood and middle-age is very seldom caused by bad luck only!
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avascular necrosis, non-union, patient reported outcome; Femoral neck fracture; Hip fracture; Osteopenia; Trauma mechanism; Young

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29983171     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  22 in total

1.  Comorbidity and mortality after hip fracture in nineteen thousand six hundred and eighty two patients aged eighteen to sixty five years in Denmark from 1996 to 2012.

Authors:  Adam Omari; Christian Medom Madsen; Jes Bruun Lauritzen; Henrik Løvendahl Jørgensen; Fie Juhl Vojdeman
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Functional outcomes and perceived quality of life following fixation of femoral neck fractures in adults from 18 to 69 years using dynamic hip screw (DHS) and an additional anti-rotation screw- a retrospective analysis of 53 patients after a mean follow-up time of 4 years.

Authors:  Anne Fjeld; Tim Fülling; Philipp Bula; Felix Bonnaire
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  A comprehensive 3D CT based classification of intertrochanteric fracture.

Authors:  R B Kalia; Shobha S Arora; Bhaskar Sarkar; Souvik Paul; Sukhmin Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-05-31

4.  Rate of conversion to secondary arthroplasty after femoral neck fractures in 796 younger patients treated with internal fixation: a Swedish national register-based study.

Authors:  Sebastian Strøm Rönnquist; Johan Lagergren; Bjarke Viberg; Michael Möller; Cecilia Rogmark
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.925

Review 5.  Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Richard Macey; Joseph Lewis; Jamie Stokes; James R Gill; Jonathan A Cook; William Gp Eardley; Martyn J Parker; Xavier L Griffin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-10

Review 6.  Surgical interventions for treating intracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Richard Macey; Jamie Stokes; Jonathan A Cook; William Gp Eardley; Xavier L Griffin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-14

7.  Assessing outcomes in hip fracture patients under the age of 60.

Authors:  David Keohane; Laith Al Azawi; Colum Downey; John F Quinlan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Daytime versus after-hours surgery outcomes in hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guoping Guan; Zhaoxiang Cheng; Jian Yin; Qin Hu; Wen Zhang; Xiao Liu; Xinhui Liu; Chao Zhu
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Good clinical outcome for the majority of younger patients with hip fractures: a Swedish nationwide study on 905 patients younger than 50 years of age.

Authors:  Oscar Thoors; Carl Mellner; Margareta Hedström
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Internal fixation implants for intracapsular hip fractures in older adults.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Richard Macey; Will Gp Eardley; Ján Robert Dixon; Jonathan Cook; Xavier L Griffin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.