Literature DB >> 33710053

Analysis of Sagittal Position Changes of the Condyle After Mandibular Setback Surgery Across the Four Different Types of Plating Systems.

Jeong-Kui Ku1, Sun-Kyu Choi2,3, Jung-Gon Lee4, Han-Chang Yu4, Sang-Yun Kim4, Young-Kyun Kim4,5, Yonsoo Shin6, Nam-Ki Lee6.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The authors analyzed the three-dimensional postoperative condylar position change across the plating systems. This retrospective study was conducted with the patients who underwent bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with setback surgery. The condylar change was analyzed from preoperative cone-beam computed tomography to postoperative 1 month (T1) and postoperative 6 months (T2) using superimposition software, automatically merging based on the anterior cranial base. The condylar changes during T1 and T2 were analyzed across the four types of plates (4-hole sliding, heart-shaped, 3-hole sliding, and 4-hole conventional) Mean intraclass correlation coefficient values were consistently high for each measurement (>0.850). During T1, the conventional plate had a decreased condylar anterior distance when compared with the 3-hole sliding plate (P = 0.032). During T2, the conventional plate had an increased condylar posterior distance when compared with the 3-hole sliding plate (P = 0.031). Superimposition software based on the anterior cranial base could be available for measurement of condylar position with highly reproducible results. After bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy, the 3-hole sliding plate could effectively compensate for the anterior displacement of the condyle compared to other plates.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Mutaz B. Habal, MD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33710053      PMCID: PMC8478309          DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.172


Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) requires complex movement of the mandibular segments, which usually induces postoperative condylar displacement. Condylar displacement is one of the contributing factors to postoperative instability, temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs), and condylar resorption. Recently, many studies have been conducted regarding postoperative condylar position using three-dimensional images.234567891011121314 Because of the nature of orthognathic surgery, dental parts such as the teeth and jaw are changed; the unchanged cranial base is commonly used as a baseline to superimposition.1516 As a result, images can be accurately superimposed, but the effects of orthognathic surgery on postoperative condylar position remain controversial due to the three-dimensional axis setting and remodeling of the temporomandibular joint complex.23 One of the major problems related to condylar position during orthognathic surgery is the difficulty in checking the intraoperative condylar position. To overcome this problem, rigid fixation has been largely replaced with semi-rigid fixation using a miniplate.171819 Furthermore, the condylar repositionable plate, which is designed to allow repositioning of the condyle during the early postoperative period, was introduced according to the same principle of semi-rigid fixation. In this plating system, the proximal segment can complete a pivot movement with 3-hole plates, a sliding movement with oval-shaped sliding plates, and a dynamic movement with heart-shaped plates. This system had been reported to be relatively stable and convenient for the operators. Because both condyles should be evaluated independently even for one patient, making analysis difficult due to the difference in the setback and yawing of the segment, limited research has been conducted on postoperative condylar position with the condylar repositionable plate. The purpose of this study has 2 parts. The first was to evaluate the reproducibility of superimposition based on the anterior cranial base using an automatic three-dimensional analysis program. The second was to analyze the postoperative condylar position change at one and twelve months after surgery across the four different types of plating systems.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study Design and Sample

Due to the retrospective nature of this study, it was granted an exemption in writing by the Institutional Review Board at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (No. B-2003-598-106) and the authors have read the Helsinki Declaration and have followed the guidelines in this investigation. This study was conducted on patients whose bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) was performed for mandibular prognathism between March 2015 and January 2019 by one expert surgeon. The inclusion criteria were: cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at the 0.2-mm voxel size level (Kodak 9500, Carestream Health, Inc., Trophy, France), CBCT with fixed the bilateral external auditory canals and soft tissue nasion, and CBCT both preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 and 6 months after surgery. The exclusion criteria were a history of maxillofacial trauma, uncontrolled systemic diseases, and the presence of a dentofacial-related deformity or syndrome.

Surgery Protocol

All patients received orthognathic surgery by one expert surgeon (YKK). All patients underwent BSSRO using the modification known as the Obwegeser-Dal Pont sagittal split of the ramus. There were no cases of maxillary operation included in this study. In all cases, the proximal segment of the mandible was stripped of its pterygomasseteric sling at the inferior and posterior borders. The condylar position was set manually in order to confirm free movement of the proximal segment before internal fixation. Intended manual condylar positioning consists of placement of the condyle according to the following procedure: Force the condyle to the highest position release the force to find the stable position of the condyle repeat the above steps until a stable, reproducible position is found, and position the proximal segment within 2 mm slightly forward. Both proximal segments were fixed with one of four different types of plates for bilateral non-rigid internal fixation: 4-hole sliding (APIS plate, Tradimedics, Gwangju, Korea; Fig. 1A), heart-shaped sliding (SJ plate, Jeil Medical, Seoul, Korea; Fig. 1B), 3-hole sliding (Leforte-III plate, Jeil Medical, Seoul, Korea; Fig. 1C), and conventional 4-hole (Leforte-IV plate, Jeil Medical, Seoul, Korea; Fig. 1D) plates. The intermaxillary fixation (IMF) was performed with four 0.7 mm wires using eight skeletal anchorage screws (6 mm length, Dual Top Anchor System, Jeil Medical, Seoul, Korea) on each of anterior and posterior of mandible and maxilla, respectively, for 2 or 3 weeks, with a surgical stent fixed on both maxillary canines. The surgical stent maintained for one to two weeks after surgery, even after removing the intermaxillary fixation.
FIGURE 1

Four types of internal fixation plates. (A) APIS plate (4-hole sliding plate). (B) SJ plate (heart-shaped sliding plate). (C) Leforte-III plate (3-hole sliding plate). (D) Leforte-IV plate (4-hole conventional plate).

Four types of internal fixation plates. (A) APIS plate (4-hole sliding plate). (B) SJ plate (heart-shaped sliding plate). (C) Leforte-III plate (3-hole sliding plate). (D) Leforte-IV plate (4-hole conventional plate).

Orthodontic Consideration

All patients received orthodontic treatment before and after their operation by one expert orthodontist (NKL) with minimal orthodontic preparation. Preoperative orthodontic was treated during 7.5 ± 3.3 months (ranged 2–14). The intermaxillary fixation period was 2 to 3 weeks after the orthognathic surgery, and postoperative orthodontic treatment was performed immediately after the removal of the intermaxillary fixation to resolve a premature contact on the posterior teeth and to stabilize the occlusion. With regarding mandibular position, lateral cephalometric analysis was done based on radiographs taken 1 and 6 months after surgery. The lateral cephalometric measurements were performed three times each by 2 orthodontist (YS and NKL), who did not involve the surgery to avoid the observer bias, using V-ceph program (Cybermed, Seoul, Korea). The means of the two rater's data were used. During postoperatively one to six months, the mandibular position change was evaluated through S-perp to B and SNB (Fig. 2).
FIGURE 2

Cephalometric analysis and definition for measurements of mandibular position. (B, Point B (most concave point of mandibular symphysis); N, nasion; Or, orbitale; Por, porion; S, sella; S-perp to B, perpendicular line to Frankfort horizontal plane from the sella; SNB, angle between S-N line to N-B line).

Cephalometric analysis and definition for measurements of mandibular position. (B, Point B (most concave point of mandibular symphysis); N, nasion; Or, orbitale; Por, porion; S, sella; S-perp to B, perpendicular line to Frankfort horizontal plane from the sella; SNB, angle between S-N line to N-B line).

Measurements of Condylar Sagittal Position With Standardization and Superimposition of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

For standardized volume images, the CBCT scans were obtained in the natural head, which was obtained in an upright posture when the patient was focusing at a distant point at eye level. The CBCT images were exported as Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files and imported to the three-dimensional analysis program (On-Demand 3D, CyberMed Co., Seoul, Korea) to measure the right and left condylar positions separately. The maxillary occlusal plane was defined between the middle of the maxillary incisor tip and the maxillary first molar as the x-axis plane. The mid-sagittal plane was defined as the plane that was perpendicular to the x-axis plane and passed through a nasion, which is defined as the middle point of the frontonasal suture. The sagittal section was analyzed on the view with the most superior point of the glenoid fossa. The anterior and posterior sagittal positions were measured as the anterior and posterior distances, respectively, between the eminence and condyle, based on the line between the orifice of the petrotympanic fissure and the lowest point of the articular eminence. The superior sagittal position was measured as the largest superior distance between the eminence and condyle, based on a perpendicular line to the aforementioned baseline (Fig. 3).
FIGURE 3

Measurement of condylar sagittal position on cone-beam computed tomography. Measuring the anterior and posterior distance between the eminence and condyle on the baseline between the orifice of the petrotympanic fissure and the lowest point of the articular eminence. The superior distance was measured from the perpendicular extent line to the baseline, across the highest point of the condyle.

Measurement of condylar sagittal position on cone-beam computed tomography. Measuring the anterior and posterior distance between the eminence and condyle on the baseline between the orifice of the petrotympanic fissure and the lowest point of the articular eminence. The superior distance was measured from the perpendicular extent line to the baseline, across the highest point of the condyle. The automated registration tool for the On-Demand3D software was used to perform the superimposition, based on the intensity of the voxels’ gray levels within the anterior cranial bases of the two volumes. The superimposition of CBCT was made from preoperative image to postoperatively at 1 month (T1), and to postoperatively 6 months (T2), respectively. The anatomical structures of the anterior cranial base were selected on axial, sagittal, and coronal slices of the early input DICOM files. After automated superimposition, the axial, coronal, and sagittal views were formed as slice directions of the early input image (Fig. 4).
FIGURE 4

Cone beam computed tomography image after superimposition of condyle (red and yellow) based on the anterior cranial base using On-Demand 3D.

Cone beam computed tomography image after superimposition of condyle (red and yellow) based on the anterior cranial base using On-Demand 3D.

Statistical Analysis

Two examiners measured both condyles of the same patients twice, 3 months apart, at the 0.01 mm level. A total of 4 analyzed results, two measurements each by the 2 examiners, were considered as independent tests. The reliability of the measurements was evaluated through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals. All continuous variables are shown as the median value [interquartile range]. Kruskal-Wallis analysis was applied to the age, amount of setback, IMF period, and changes of the mandibular body and the condyle across the types of plates. Post-hoc analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test with a correction of type 1 error according to Bonferroni's method. Statistical significance was assessed based on a P value less than 0.05. All statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 22.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

A total of 52 condyles on 26 patients (14 males and 12 females, median age of 21.50 [5.00] years) were enrolled. The average amount of setback was 8.00 [4.00] and 7.50 [6.00] mm on the right and left side, respectively. Intermaxillary fixation was performed for two weeks on 18 patients and 3 weeks on 8 patients. Six patients were fixed with the APIS plate, 6 with the SJ plate, nine with the Leforte-III plate, and five with the Leforte-IV plate. No significant difference was seen in the mean age, amount of setback on either side, and the fixation period (Supplementary Digital Content, Table 1).

Changes in Mandibular Body Position Among the Types of Plates

Overall, the distal segment of mandible moved forward direction as a relapse after the setback orthognathic surgery. However, there was no difference in the relapse tendency of mandible among the types of plates from postoperative one month to 6 months (S perp to B, P < 0.190; SNB, 0.821; Supplementary Digital Content, Table 2) Reliability Analysis of the Condylar Position The ICC values of the 4 data points on condyle position, as measured by the 2 examiners twice each, were calculated for the right and left sagittal distances on anterior (0.961, CI: 0.973–0.987 and 0.970, CI: 0.957–0.979, respectively), posterior (0.957, CI: 0.939–0.971 and 0.950, CI: 0.929–0.966, respectively), and superior (0.923, CI: 0.890–0.947 and 0.862, CI: 0.805–0.906, respectively). Overall, this method showed consistently high mean ICC values across all four measurements (Supplementary Digital Content, Table 3).

Changes in Condyle Position Among the Types of Plates

During T1, changes in the condylar anterior distance showed a statistically significant difference among the different types of plates (P = 0.017). Among the plates, the anterior distance was decreased in the Leforte-IV plate compared with no change in the Leforte-III plates (−0.80 [3.96] versus 0.00 [0.52], P = 0.032) (Supplementary Digital Content, Table 3). However, changes in the condylar posterior and superior distances showed no statistically significant difference across the types of plates. The condylar anterior distance change showed no statistically significant difference among the types of plates during T2 (Supplementary Digital Content, Table 4). However, the posterior distance changes showed a statistically significant difference among the types of plates (P = 0.010). Among the plates, the posterior change was increased in Leforte-IV plate compared with the Leforte-III plate (0.00 [0.72] and 1.16 [2.88] mm, 0.031) (Supplementary Digital Content, Table 4). During T2, the superior distance changes with the APIS and Leforte-III plates (0.03 [0.89] and 0.00 [0.22] mm, respectively) were less than those of the SJ and Leforte-IV plates (0.30 [0.54] and 0.51 [2.13] mm, respectively), and the overall changes were significantly different among the groups (P = 0.031). However, the statistically corrected values of type 1 error did not show any significant difference in each group.

DISCUSSION

Two assumptions were verified in the present study with 52 condyles on 26 patients (14 males and 12 females, average aged 21.50 years). First, the automatic superimposition software based on the anterior cranial base showed high reproducibility. Second, the condylar position changes after setback surgery with BSSRO showed different aspects associated with the types of plates (one conventional plate and three condylar repositionable plates—4-hole sliding, heart-shaped, and 3-hole sliding plates). CBCT is a three-dimensional imaging technique with low radiation exposure and is widely used for planning maxillofacial surgery. The technical development of the software program allows for precise measurements of distances and angles by superimposition of a stable structure.23 Considering the shape and axis direction of the mandibular condyle, however, the condylar evaluation is difficult to determine on a selected single CT cut image. We selected the cut image, included the most protruding part of the condyle, based on a three-dimensional axis with maxillary occlusal planes. Our criterion was found to be highly reliable among the four results of measurements between the 2 examiners (all ICC values > 0.850). As a base axis, the maxillary occlusal plane could be an available reference for dentists that enables accurate analysis. Since 1962, joint space measurements have been used to assess the mandibular condyle position radiographically. The distance measurement between the joint space, composed of the condyle and eminence, could be related to TMDs. In addition, the condyle undergoes compensatory adaptation during the postoperative period. Such remodeling could change the distance or rotation and has been suggested as a possible factor in TMDs. However, some studies reported no significant change in condylar shape, disc position, and relevant symptoms after mandibular setback orthognathic surgery.67 The authors measured the change from preoperative to postoperative 1 month (T1) and to postoperative 6 months (T2). The average age, setback distance of the right and left sides, intermaxillary fixation period, and distal segment (mandibular body) position change were not significantly different among the types of plates (Supplementary Digital Content, Table 1 and Supplementary Digital Content, Table 2). The mandibular body was relapsed forwardly regardless of the types of plates, and the condylar position was anteriorly and inferiorly displaced after the orthognathic surgery. These results corroborated those of previous studies.410111213 During T1, the overall anterior sagittal distance decreased. In particular, the anterior distance decreased more with the conventional plate (0.80 [3.96] mm) compared to the 3-hole sliding plate (0.00 [0.52] mm) (P = 0.032). Kim et al reported that this anterior movement at 2 weeks after surgery was due to the occurrence of edema and hemarthrosis. However, this early displacement of the proximal segment could be more successfully compensated with the 3-hole sliding plate than with the conventional plate. This tendency became more pronounced during T2 in the posterior condylar distance, which was overall increased, but was more increased with the conventional plate (1.16 [2.88] mm) compared to the 3-hole sliding plate (0.00 [0.50]) (P = 0.031). With regard to the antero-posterior sagittal position, the 3-hole sliding type of condylar repositionable plate could effectively compensate for condylar anterior displacement during the 6 months after surgery. Furthermore, during T2, the 4-hole sliding and 3-hole sliding plates showed little change in the median value of the superior distance (0.03 [0.89] and 0.00 [0.22] mm, respectively), while the heart-shaped and 4-hole conventional plates showed increased inferior displacement (0.30 [0.54] and 0.51 [2.13] mm, respectively). Among the groups, the superior distance changes showed a significant difference in the Kruskal-Wallis test (P = 0.031). Although there was no significant difference between each group by Bonferroni correction, the 3-hole sliding plates showed less of a change than the heart-shaped and 4-hole conventional plates when considering the interquartile range. Considering the limitations of this study, the 3-hole sliding plate, among the 3 types of condylar repositionable plates, might most effectively compensate for the well-known inferior displacement of the condyle, as seen in previous studies.4101112 The relationship between changes in condylar position and TMDs has been very controversial within the scientific community. Some studies have reported that minor changes do not play a significant role, as corroborated by the present study.67 However, some degree of condylar displacement may jeopardize not only stability in orthognathic surgery but also the orthodontic treatment. Therefore, the importance of including the determination of condyle position during orthodontic diagnostic procedures becomes very clear. Although this study did not analyze condylar shape change, condylar remodeling affects long-term outcomes of orthognathic surgery in association with condylar position. We could not evaluate the lateral and medial angulation of the condylar process because there was lack of reproducibility to measure a long axis of condyle on coronal and axial plane. In addition, the distal segment (mandibular body) position was evaluated antero-posteriorly on cephalometric radiographs. To overcome several limitations of this retrospective study, further research on condylar position and shape should include an improved prospective design and a larger number of patients with considering the three-dimensional positional change of the distal segment.

CONCLUSION

Using the maxillary occlusal plane as a reference axis plane, a three-dimensional measurement was performed with highly reproducible results and enabled accurate analysis. Considering the limitations of this study, the condylar repositionable plate could compensate for the anterior displacement of the condyle, and, in particular, the 3-hole sliding plate could prevent anterior displacement in the early period and might be effective in compensating for inferior displacement of the condyle during the 6 months after setback surgery.
  27 in total

1.  A comparison of the stability of miniplate with bicortical screw fixation after sagittal split setback.

Authors:  B H Choi; Y S Min; C K Yi; W Y Lee
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2000-10

2.  Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients.

Authors:  L H S Cevidanes; L J Bailey; G R Tucker; M A Styner; A Mol; C L Phillips; W R Proffit; T Turvey
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models.

Authors:  Lucia H S Cevidanes; Martin A Styner; William R Proffit
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  3D vector analysis of mandibular condyle stability in mandibular setback surgery with bicortical bioabsorbable screw fixation.

Authors:  Jee Ho Lee; Soung Min Kim; Bu Kyu Lee; Ju Hong Jeon; Myung Jin Kim
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Effect of intended manual condylar positioning on skeletal and dental changes in Skeletal Class III deformities: CBCT-generated half-cephalograms.

Authors:  Dae-Seok Hwang; Yong-Il Kim; Kyung-Min Lee
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Changes in condylar position after BSSRO with and without Le Fort I osteotomy via surgery-first approach in mandibular prognathism with facial asymmetry.

Authors:  Jiyin Li; Sun-Youl Ryu; Hong-Ju Park; Min-Suk Kook; Seunggon Jung; Jeong Joon Han; Hee-Kyun Oh
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2017-02-06

7.  Comparison of Orthodontics-First and Surgery-First Approach in Positional Changes of the Condyle After Mandibular Setback Surgery Using Three-Dimensional Analysis.

Authors:  Tongyue Wang; Jeong Joon Han; Hee-Kyun Oh; Hong-Ju Park; Seunggon Jung; Min-Suk Kook
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Condylar positional changes up to 12 months after bimaxillary surgery for skeletal class III malocclusions.

Authors:  Yeon-Joo Kim; Yoonjung Lee; Youn-Sic Chun; Nara Kang; Sun-Jong Kim; Minji Kim
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  The difference in condylar position between centric relation and centric occlusion in pretreatment Japanese orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Osamu Hidaka; Satoshi Adachi; Kenji Takada
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Change in condylar position in posterior bending osteotomy minimizing condylar torque in BSSRO for facial asymmetry.

Authors:  Hoon Joo Yang; Soon Jung Hwang
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 2.078

View more
  1 in total

1.  Accuracy of dental implant placement with computer-guided surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jeong-Kui Ku; Junggon Lee; Hyo-Jung Lee; Pil-Young Yun; Young-Kyun Kim
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 2.757

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.