Literature DB >> 27549608

Comparison of Orthodontics-First and Surgery-First Approach in Positional Changes of the Condyle After Mandibular Setback Surgery Using Three-Dimensional Analysis.

Tongyue Wang1, Jeong Joon Han2, Hee-Kyun Oh3, Hong-Ju Park3, Seunggon Jung4, Min-Suk Kook5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine and compare the 3-dimensional (3D) postoperative changes of the condylar position after mandibular setback surgery using the orthodontics-first approach (OFA) and surgery-first approach (SFA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients who had undergone bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism using OFA or SFA. Computed tomography images were obtained and analyzed preoperatively (T0), postoperatively (T1), and at the 6-month follow-up visit (T2). The bodily shift of the condylar center and rotational movement of the condylar head were measured using the 3D coordinate system between each time point and compared between the OFA and SFA groups. Repeated measures analysis of variance with a Bonferroni post hoc test was used to compare the time course changes of the condylar position for the 2 surgical-orthodontic approaches.
RESULTS: A total of 55 patients (mean age 21.9 years; 31 males, 24 females) were evaluated. Of the 55 patients, 29 had undergone OFA and 26, SFA. In both groups, the condyle showed perioperative lateral and inferior displacement with inward rotation, followed by returning to its preoperative position during the 6 months postoperatively. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in the time course change of the condylar position.
CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the timing of the operation (OFA vs SFA), the perioperative and postoperative changes of the condylar position after mandibular setback surgery are equivalent.
Copyright © 2016 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27549608     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  4 in total

Review 1.  Mandibular condyle displacements after orthognathic surgery-an overview of quantitative studies.

Authors:  Dominik Pachnicz; António Ramos
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-04

2.  Analysis of Sagittal Position Changes of the Condyle After Mandibular Setback Surgery Across the Four Different Types of Plating Systems.

Authors:  Jeong-Kui Ku; Sun-Kyu Choi; Jung-Gon Lee; Han-Chang Yu; Sang-Yun Kim; Young-Kyun Kim; Yonsoo Shin; Nam-Ki Lee
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.172

3.  Short-term and long-term alterations of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback: A preliminary before-after clinical trial.

Authors:  Farhad Sobouti; Hoora Hadian; Amir Hosein Pakravan; Zahra Rahimi; Vahid Rakhshan; Sepideh Dadgar
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2022-02-28

Review 4.  Facial asymmetry correction: From conventional orthognathic treatment to surgery-first approach.

Authors:  Tahereh Hosseinzadeh Nik; Elaheh Gholamrezaei; Mohammad Ali Keshvad
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2019
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.