Literature DB >> 23816144

Change in condylar position in posterior bending osteotomy minimizing condylar torque in BSSRO for facial asymmetry.

Hoon Joo Yang1, Soon Jung Hwang2.   

Abstract

During the correction of an asymmetric mandible with sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO), bony interference between the proximal and distal segments inevitably occurs. This results in positional change of the condyle. In order to avoid this, a posterior bending osteotomy (PBO) has been introduced. This is an additional vertical osteotomy posterior to the second molar after SSRO. To investigate the change in condylar position after SSRO with PBO, 22 patients with facial asymmetry were enrolled and divided into two groups based on the surgical method used to remove the bony interference after SSRO: PBO (n = 13) and the grinding method (n = 9). Each group was subdivided into large and small bony interference groups by estimating the volume of bony interference with simulation surgery. Condylar displacement was evaluated by three-dimensional superimposition and the amount of condylar displacement was calculated. The positional changes of the condyles were variable in each patient. When comparing patients with large bony interference in the PBO and grinding groups, the condyles were significantly inwardly rotated in the grinding group (p < 0.05). The grinding method can be used to remove small bony interferences with tolerable condylar torque. However, PBO would be beneficial in correcting large bony interferences while minimizing condylar torque.
Copyright © 2013 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Facial asymmetry; Mandibular condyle; Sagittal split ramus osteotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23816144     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  11 in total

Review 1.  Mandibular condyle displacements after orthognathic surgery-an overview of quantitative studies.

Authors:  Dominik Pachnicz; António Ramos
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-04

2.  Minimizing Relapse in Mandibular Asymmetry Correction by BSSRO with Intentional Osteotomy of Distal Segment: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  R Vimalraj; N Jayakumar; K George Varghese; S Mohan; Bobby John; Somil Chhag
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-03-14

3.  Analysis of Sagittal Position Changes of the Condyle After Mandibular Setback Surgery Across the Four Different Types of Plating Systems.

Authors:  Jeong-Kui Ku; Sun-Kyu Choi; Jung-Gon Lee; Han-Chang Yu; Sang-Yun Kim; Young-Kyun Kim; Yonsoo Shin; Nam-Ki Lee
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.172

4.  Positional changes of the mandibular condyle in unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy combined with intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for asymmetric class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Jun Park; Ki-Eun Hong; Ji-Eon Yun; Eun-Sup Shin; Chul-Hoon Kim; Bok-Joo Kim; Jung-Han Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-10-31

5.  Morphologic Analysis of the Temporomandibular Joint Between Patients With Facial Asymmetry and Asymptomatic Subjects by 2D and 3D Evaluation: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Yuan-Li Zhang; Jin-Lin Song; Xian-Chao Xu; Lei-Lei Zheng; Qing-Yuan Wang; Yu-Bo Fan; Zhan Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Comprehensive Analysis of Mandibular Residual Asymmetry after Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Correction of Menton Point Deviation.

Authors:  Han Lin; Ping Zhu; Qiuping Lin; Xiaoqiong Huang; Yue Xu; Xiaoping Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Computer-Aided Surgical Simulation for Yaw Control of the Mandibular Condyle and Its Actual Application to Orthognathic Surgery: A One-Year Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Ju-Won Kim; Jong-Cheol Kim; Kyeong-Jun Cheon; Seoung-Won Cho; Young-Hee Kim; Byoung-Eun Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Facial asymmetry correction: From conventional orthognathic treatment to surgery-first approach.

Authors:  Tahereh Hosseinzadeh Nik; Elaheh Gholamrezaei; Mohammad Ali Keshvad
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2019

9.  Horizontal change of philtrum after orthognathic surgery in patients with facial asymmetry.

Authors:  Yewon Joh; Hyun Soo Park; Hoon Joo Yang; Soon Jung Hwang
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-11-13

10.  Characterization of facial asymmetry phenotypes in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion using three-dimensional computed tomography and cluster analysis.

Authors:  Sang-Woon Ha; Su-Jung Kim; Jin-Young Choi; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.