OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the registration of 3D models from cone-beam CT (CBCT) images taken before and after orthognathic surgery for the assessment of mandibular anatomy and position. METHODS: CBCT scans were taken before and after orthognathic surgery for ten patients with various malocclusions undergoing maxillary surgery only. 3D models were constructed from the CBCT images utilizing semi-automatic segmentation and manual editing. The cranial base was used to register 3D models of pre- and post-surgery scans (1 week). After registration, a novel tool allowed the visual and quantitative assessment of post-operative changes via 2D overlays of superimposed models and 3D coloured displacement maps. RESULTS: 3D changes in mandibular rami position after surgical procedures were clearly illustrated by the 3D colour-coded maps. The average displacement of all surfaces was 0.77 mm (SD=0.17 mm), at the posterior border 0.78 mm (SD=0.25 mm), and at the condyle 0.70 mm (SD=0.07 mm). These displacements were close to the image spatial resolution of 0.60 mm. The average interobserver differences were negligible. The range of the interobserver errors for the average of all mandibular rami surface distances was 0.02 mm (SD=0.01 mm). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest this method provides a valid and reproducible assessment of craniofacial structures for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. This technique may be used to identify different patterns of ramus and condylar remodelling following orthognathic surgery.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the registration of 3D models from cone-beam CT (CBCT) images taken before and after orthognathic surgery for the assessment of mandibular anatomy and position. METHODS: CBCT scans were taken before and after orthognathic surgery for ten patients with various malocclusions undergoing maxillary surgery only. 3D models were constructed from the CBCT images utilizing semi-automatic segmentation and manual editing. The cranial base was used to register 3D models of pre- and post-surgery scans (1 week). After registration, a novel tool allowed the visual and quantitative assessment of post-operative changes via 2D overlays of superimposed models and 3D coloured displacement maps. RESULTS: 3D changes in mandibular rami position after surgical procedures were clearly illustrated by the 3D colour-coded maps. The average displacement of all surfaces was 0.77 mm (SD=0.17 mm), at the posterior border 0.78 mm (SD=0.25 mm), and at the condyle 0.70 mm (SD=0.07 mm). These displacements were close to the image spatial resolution of 0.60 mm. The average interobserver differences were negligible. The range of the interobserver errors for the average of all mandibular rami surface distances was 0.02 mm (SD=0.01 mm). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest this method provides a valid and reproducible assessment of craniofacial structures for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. This technique may be used to identify different patterns of ramus and condylar remodelling following orthognathic surgery.
Authors: E Nkenke; S Zachow; M Benz; T Maier; K Veit; M Kramer; S Benz; G Häusler; F Wilhelm Neukam; M Lell Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Lucia H S Cevidanes; Alexandre A Franco; Guido Gerig; William R Proffit; Dennis E Slice; Donald H Enlow; Henrique M Lederman; Leila Amorim; Marco A Scanavini; Julio W Vigorito Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: I Ono; T Ohura; E Narumi; K Kawashima; I Matsuno; S Nakamura; N Ohhata; Y Uchiyama; Y Watanabe; F Tanaka Journal: J Craniomaxillofac Surg Date: 1992 Feb-Mar Impact factor: 2.078
Authors: Lucia H S Cevidanes; Alexandre A Franco; Guido Gerig; William R Proffit; Dennis E Slice; Donald H Enlow; Helio K Yamashita; Yong-Jik Kim; Marco A Scanavini; Julio W Vigorito Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Lucia H C Cevidanes; Ana Emilia Figueiredo Oliveira; Dan Grauer; Martin Styner; William R Proffit Journal: Semin Orthod Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 0.970
Authors: F S Neves; T C Souza; S M Almeida; F Haiter-Neto; D Q Freitas; F N Bóscolo Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: L R Gomes; L H Cevidanes; M R Gomes; A C Ruellas; D P Ryan; B Paniagua; L M Wolford; J R Gonçalves Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 2.789
Authors: Liliane Rosas Gomes; Lúcia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Marcelo Regis Gomes; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Daniel Patrick Obelenis Ryan; Beatriz Paniagua; Larry Miller Wolford; João Roberto Gonçalves Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 2.650