Literature DB >> 14676693

Factors determining shape and symmetry in immediate breast reconstruction.

Donald A Hudson1.   

Abstract

Although a number of studies compare different techniques of breast reconstruction there seems to be a paucity of information documenting the factors that affect breast shape and symmetry after immediate reconstruction. A photographic analysis by 5 plastic surgeons (who were blinded to the nature of the procedure) of 62 patients undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction was undertaken in an endeavor to identify these factors. Autologous techniques used included deepithelialized pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps (n = 23; in 9 patients a bilateral breast reduction using inverted-T keyhole skin markings was performed, and the TRAM flap was used to fill the reduced skin pocket) and 4 patients had extended latissimus dorsi flaps. Prosthetic reconstruction was undertaken in 35 patients in whom a bilateral breast reduction skin pattern was used in 23 (prosthesis inserted submuscularly in 5 patients and subcutaneously in 18 patients) or, in another 12 patients the skin envelope was retained and the prosthesis was inserted partially submuscularly in 7 patients and subcutaneously in 5 patients. As a total group, the results of autologous reconstruction were better than prosthetic reconstruction (P = 0.048, Mann-Whitney U test). However, when a breast reduction pattern was used and the prosthesis was inserted subcutaneously, the results were not significantly better than when the reduced skin envelope was filled by autologous tissue (P = 0.64, Mann-Whitney U test). Failure to replace the areola leads to a smaller reconstructed breast and asymmetry. The skin envelope, when retained in toto, seems to be a major factor affecting breast shape. In patients with a reduction pattern applied, the skin envelope again seems to be a major factor affecting shape, because the results are similar whether the envelope was filled with autologous tissue or prosthetic material. The neoparenchyma is an important factor affecting breast projection. In patients undergoing prosthetic reconstruction, the results were significantly better with subglandular placement compared with submuscular placement (P = 0.007, Mann-Whitney U test). Patients who developed a complication (requiring debridement in the operating room or that took more than a month to achieve healing) had a poorer cosmetic result (P = 0.015, Mann-Whitney U test). These factors need to be considered when planning breast reconstruction to optimize the aesthetic result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14676693     DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000099962.79156.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  15 in total

1.  Three-dimensional prediction of free-flap volume in autologous breast reconstruction by CT angiography imaging.

Authors:  Maximilian Eder; Stefan Raith; Jalil Jalali; Daniel Müller; Yves Harder; Martin Dobritz; Nikolaos A Papadopulos; Hans-Günther Machens; Laszlo Kovacs
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  Breast volumetric analysis for aesthetic planning in breast reconstruction: a literature review of techniques.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; Warren Matthew Rozen; Robert T Spychal; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

3.  Breast reconstruction with tissue expanders and implants: a practical guide to immediate and delayed reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrea L Pusic; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: patient satisfaction and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Mohamed Salhab; Wail Al Sarakbi; Antony Joseph; Susan Sheards; Joan Travers; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue following mastectomy.

Authors:  Hr Teymouri; S Stergioula; M Eder; L Kovacs; E Biemer; Na Papadopulos
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.471

6.  Oncological outcome and patient satisfaction with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Sara Reefy; Neill Patani; Anne Anderson; Gwyne Burgoyne; Hisham Osman; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Multi-center investigation of breast reconstruction after mastectomy from Chinese Society of Breast Surgery: A survey based on 31 tertiary hospitals (CSBrS-004).

Authors:  Feng Xu; Chuqi Lei; Heng Cao; Jun Liu; Jie Li; Hongchuan Jiang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  Weight versus volume in breast surgery: an observational study.

Authors:  Chetan Parmar; Malcolm West; Samir Pathak; J Nelson; Lee Martin
Journal:  JRSM Short Rep       Date:  2011-11-15

9.  Effects of Subcutaneous versus Submuscular Tissue Expander Placement on Breast Capsule Formation.

Authors:  Koichi Tomita; Kenji Yano; Akimitsu Nishibayashi; Ko Hosokawa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-07-08

10.  Tissue expansion: further attempts to improve results in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Donald A Hudson; Kevin G Adams; Saleigh Adams
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2011-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.