Literature DB >> 23806958

Implant-based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP Bra): a multicenter study of 231 cases.

Max Dieterich1, Stefan Paepke, Karin Zwiefel, Holger Dieterich, Jens Blohmer, Andree Faridi, Evelyn Klein, Bernd Gerber, Carolin Nestle-Kraemling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An alternative to implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix is the use of a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh. The mesh was approved for implant-based breast reconstruction in Europe in 2008, but only limited clinical data are available.
METHODS: Two hundred seven patients (231 breasts) with skin-sparing/nipple-sparing or modified radical mastectomy and immediate or delayed implant-based breast reconstruction using titanium-coated polypropylene mesh were evaluated retrospectively. The primary endpoints were identification of patient-related and surgical factors that were predictive for an adverse outcome and the development of recommendations for patients eligible for implant-based breast reconstruction using the mesh. Complications were divided into major (need for additional surgery), minor (conservative treatment), and implant loss. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the influence of the patient- and procedure-related characteristics on postoperative complications and implant loss.
RESULTS: No risk factors were observed for patient-associated complications. Major complications occurred in 13.4 percent, minor complications in 15.6 percent, and implant loss in 8.7 percent of patients. Univariate analysis revealed procedure-related risk factors for postoperative complications with a bilateral procedure (p = 0.013) or skin expansion before implant surgery (p = 0.043). Multivariate analysis confirmed these risk factors and revealed an increased risk for implant loss in patients with skin necrosis (p < 0.001) and capsule fibrosis (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This titanium-coated polypropylene mesh shows acceptable complication rates and can be a helpful device in implant-based breast reconstruction. The mesh should only be used in primary cases and, when adhering to the proposed indications, is a safe and convenient option in implant-based breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23806958     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318290f8a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  30 in total

Review 1.  Nipple sparing mastectomy and the evolving direct to implant breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Gudjon Leifur Gunnarsson; Lene Nyhøj Heidemann; Camilla Bille; Jens Ahm Sørensen; Jørn Bo Thomsen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-06

2.  Biological Matrices and Synthetic Meshes Used in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction - a Review of Products Available in Germany.

Authors:  M Dieterich; A Faridi
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 3.  Alloplastic adjuncts in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Miguel S Cabalag; Marie Rostek; George S Miller; Michael P Chae; Tam Quinn; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

Review 4.  Surgical perspectives regarding application of biomaterials for the management of large congenital diaphragmatic hernia defects.

Authors:  Amulya K Saxena
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 5.  Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jordan Kaplan; Ryan D Wagner; Tara L Braun; Carrie Chu; Sebastian J Winocour
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.314

6.  Skin-Areola, Nipple Sparing, and Subcutaneous Mastectomy and Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh.

Authors:  Leyla Özel; V Melih Kara; Oğuzhan Sunamak; Hikmet Karagüllü; Jülide Sağıroğlu; Onur İlhan; Fügen Aker
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2015-07-01

7.  A Head to Head Comparison Between SurgiMend® - Fetal Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix and Tutomesh® - A Bovine Pericardium Collagen Membrane in Breast Reconstruction in 45 Cases.

Authors:  Christian Eichler; Jeria Efremova; Klaus Brunnert; Christian M Kurbacher; Oleg Gluz; Julian Puppe; Mathias Warm
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Patient-Reported Outcomes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Alone or in Combination with a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh - A Detailed Analysis of the BREAST-Q and Overview of the Literature.

Authors:  M Dieterich; J Angres; J Stubert; A Stachs; T Reimer; B Gerber
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Comparison of Subpectoral versus Prepectoral Immediate Implant Reconstruction after Skin- and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Hospital-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Fabinshy Thangarajah; Timo Treeter; Barbara Krug; Martin Hellmich; Christian Eichler; Bettina Hanstein; Peter Mallmann; Wolfram Malter
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Simple prosthesis versus prosthesis plus titanium-coated polypropylene mesh for implant-based immediate breast reconstruction after total mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoli Yao; Yueyue Guo; Yi Tu; Feng Yao; Chuang Chen; Shengrong Sun; Xinghua Zhang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.