Literature DB >> 33684215

Validity of Body-Composition Methods across Racial and Ethnic Populations.

Malia N M Blue1, Grant M Tinsley2, Eric D Ryan3, Abbie E Smith-Ryan3,4.   

Abstract

Multi-compartment body-composition models that divide the body into its multiple constituents are the criterion method for measuring body fat percentage, fat mass, and fat-free mass. However, 2- and 3-compartment body-composition devices such as air displacement plethysmography (ADP), DXA, and bioelectrical impedance devices [bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)] are more commonly used. Accurate measures depend on several assumptions, including constant hydration, body proportion, fat-free body density, and population characteristics. Investigations evaluating body composition in racial and ethnic minorities have observed differences in the aforementioned components between cohorts. Consequently, for racial/ethnic minority populations, estimates of body composition may not be valid. The purpose of this review was to comprehensively examine the validity of common body-composition devices in multi-ethnic samples (samples including >1 race/ethnicity) and in African-American, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American populations. Based on the literature, DXA produces valid results in multi-ethnic samples and ADP is valid for Hispanic and African American males when utilizing race-specific equations. However, for DXA and ADP, there is a need for validity investigations that include larger, more racially diverse samples, specifically including Hispanic/Latinx, Asian, Native American adults, and African-American females. Technology has advanced significantly since initial validity studies were conducted; therefore, conclusions are based on outdated models and software. For BIA, body-composition measures may be valid in a multi-ethnic sample, but the literature demonstrates disparate results between races/ethnicities. For BIA and ADP, the majority of studies have utilized DXA or hydrostatic weighing as the criterion to determine validity; additional studies utilizing a multi-compartment model criterion are essential to evaluate accuracy. Validity studies evaluating more recent technology in larger, more racially/ethnically diverse samples may improve our ability to select the appropriate method to accurately assess body composition in each racial/ethnic population.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African American; Asian; Hispanic; Native American; body fat percentage; fat-free mass; multi-ethnic; validation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33684215      PMCID: PMC8528114          DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmab016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   8.701


  63 in total

1.  Body fat measurement among Singaporean Chinese, Malays and Indians: a comparative study using a four-compartment model and different two-compartment models.

Authors:  M Deurenberg-Yap; G Schmidt; W A van Staveren; J G Hautvast; P Deurenberg
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 2.  Racial and ethnic differences in cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anita K Kurian; Kathryn M Cardarelli
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.847

3.  Body Composition Analysis by Using Bioelectrical Impedance in a Young Healthy Chinese Population: Methodological Considerations.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Hua Jiang; Jiong-Xian Yang; Hao Yang; Jing-Min Liu; Xiu-Yuan Zhen; Lian-Jun Feng; Jian-Chun Yu
Journal:  Food Nutr Bull       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.069

4.  Density of fat-free body mass: relationship with race, age, and level of body fatness.

Authors:  M Visser; D Gallagher; P Deurenberg; J Wang; R N Pierson; S B Heymsfield
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1997-05

5.  Fat-free mass characteristics vary based on sex, race, and weight status in US adults.

Authors:  Grant M Tinsley; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Youngdeok Kim; Malia N M Blue; Brett S Nickerson; Matthew T Stratton; Patrick S Harty
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Validation of body fat measurement by skinfolds and two bioelectric impedance methods with DEXA--the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study [CURES-3].

Authors:  Sudha Vasudev; Anjana Mohan; Deepa Mohan; S Farooq; Deepa Raj; V Mohan
Journal:  J Assoc Physicians India       Date:  2004-11

7.  Prediction of fatness by standing 8-electrode bioimpedance: a multiethnic adolescent population.

Authors:  John D Sluyter; David Schaaf; Robert K R Scragg; Lindsay D Plank
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Ability of new octapolar bioimpedance spectroscopy analyzers to predict 4-component-model percentage body fat in Hispanic, black, and white adults.

Authors:  Ann L Gibson; Jason C Holmes; Richard L Desautels; Lyndsay B Edmonds; Laura Nuudi
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Body fat measurement by bioelectrical impedance and air displacement plethysmography: a cross-validation study to design bioelectrical impedance equations in Mexican adults.

Authors:  Nayeli Macias; Heliodoro Alemán-Mateo; Julián Esparza-Romero; Mauro E Valencia
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  Diversity in Clinical and Biomedical Research: A Promise Yet to Be Fulfilled.

Authors:  Sam S Oh; Joshua Galanter; Neeta Thakur; Maria Pino-Yanes; Nicolas E Barcelo; Marquitta J White; Danielle M de Bruin; Ruth M Greenblatt; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Alan H B Wu; Luisa N Borrell; Chris Gunter; Neil R Powe; Esteban G Burchard
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.