Literature DB >> 32882467

Fat-free mass characteristics vary based on sex, race, and weight status in US adults.

Grant M Tinsley1, Abbie E Smith-Ryan2, Youngdeok Kim3, Malia N M Blue2, Brett S Nickerson4, Matthew T Stratton5, Patrick S Harty5.   

Abstract

Common body composition estimation techniques necessitate assumptions of uniform fat-free mass (FFM) characteristics, although variation due to sex, race, and body characteristics may occur. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data from 1999 to 2004, during which paired dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioimpedance spectroscopy assessments were performed, were used to estimate FFM characteristics in a sample of 4619 US adults. Calculated FFM characteristics included the density and water, bone mineral, and residual content of FFM. A rapid 4-component model was also produced using DXA and bioimpedance spectroscopy data. Study variables were compared across sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), and age categories using multiple pairwise comparisons. A general linear model was used to estimate body composition after controlling for other variables. Statistical analyses accounted for 6-year sampling weights and complex sampling design of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and were based on 5 multiply imputed datasets. Differences in FFM characteristics across sex, race, and BMI were observed, with notable dissimilarities between men and women for all outcome variables. In racial/ethnic comparisons, non-Hispanic blacks most commonly presented distinct FFM characteristics relative to other groups, including greater FFM density and proportion of bone mineral. Body composition errors between DXA and the 4-component model were significantly influenced by sex, age, race, and BMI. In conclusion, FFM characteristics, which are often assumed in body composition estimation methods, vary due to sex, race/ethnicity, and weight status. The variation of FFM characteristics in diverse populations should be considered when body composition is evaluated.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body composition; Ethnicity; Obesity; Overweight; Race

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32882467     DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2020.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Res        ISSN: 0271-5317            Impact factor:   3.315


  4 in total

1.  Proportional bias of multifrequency bioimpedance analysis is larger in Hispanic females than males.

Authors:  Brett S Nickerson; Ronald L Snarr
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.876

2.  Trends in Abdominal Obesity and Central Adiposity Measures by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Among US Children: 2011-2018.

Authors:  Jiahui Liu; Yue Zhao; Yalan Tian; Nana Jiang; Gang Zhao; Xia Wang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.569

Review 3.  Validity of Body-Composition Methods across Racial and Ethnic Populations.

Authors:  Malia N M Blue; Grant M Tinsley; Eric D Ryan; Abbie E Smith-Ryan
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 8.701

4.  Trends in obesity and adiposity measures by race or ethnicity among adults in the United States 2011-18: population based study.

Authors:  Buyun Liu; Yang Du; Yuxiao Wu; Linda G Snetselaar; Robert B Wallace; Wei Bao
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-03-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.