Literature DB >> 33680813

Self-reported metal hypersensitivity in patients undergoing unicondylar knee arthroplasty.

Halis Atıl Atilla1, Hüseyin Bilgehan Çevik1, Mutlu Akdoğan1, Hakan Aslan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There is ongoing discussion about arthroplasty surgery of patients with metal hypersensitivity. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes and eosinophil counts of unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) patients with and without a history of metal hypersensitivity.
METHODS: A retrospective review was made of the medical records of 148 extremities of 140 consecutive patients who underwent primary UKA between January 2016 and December 2017. The patients who met the inclusion criteria were screened for history of metal hypersensitivity using a questionnaire. The functional outcomes of patients and eosinophil levels were evaluated immediately before and at 6 weeks after surgery.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 37 months (range, 18-48 months). Of the total 128 patients, 13 (10.2%) reported a history of metal hypersensitivity before the operation. There was no statistically significant difference between patients with or without a history of metal hypersensitivity in respect of the functional outcomes or eosinophil counts (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that the functional outcomes of patients who underwent UKA using a standard alloy did not change between the groups who reported having or not having a history of metal hypersensitivity. Although the study also showed that the eosinophil counts decreased after surgery compared to the preoperative counts, there was no statistical relationship between the eosinophil count and functional outcomes or metal hypersensitivity history.
© 2020 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allergy; Eosinophil count; Metal hypersensitivity; Self-reported; Unicondylar knee arthroplasty; Unicondylar knee prosthesis

Year:  2020        PMID: 33680813      PMCID: PMC7919954          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  36 in total

Review 1.  Hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants - diagnostic algorithm and suggested patch test series for clinical use.

Authors:  Peter C Schalock; Torkil Menné; Jeanne D Johansen; James S Taylor; Howard I Maibach; Carola Lidén; Magnus Bruze; Jacob P Thyssen
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  The effect of patient-reported metal allergies on the outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Justin C Kennon; Julia Lee; Chad Songy; Dave Shukla; Robert H Cofield; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; John W Sperling
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Cutaneous metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic injuries.

Authors:  M F Swiontkowski; J Agel; J Schwappach; P McNair; M Welch
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  No Increased Risk of Knee Arthroplasty Failure in Patients With Positive Skin Patch Testing for Metal Hypersensitivity: A Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Dalibel Bravo; Eric R Wagner; Dirk R Larson; Mark P Davis; Mark W Pagnano; Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Unicondylar knee arthroplasty using cobalt-chromium implants in patients with self-reported cutaneous metal hypersensitivity.

Authors:  T Walker; L Rutkowski; M Innmann; B Panzram; J Herre; T Gotterbarm; P R Aldinger; C Merle
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Esa Koskinen; Pekka Paavolainen; Antti Eskelinen; Pekka Pulkkinen; Ville Remes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 7.  Allergy in total knee replacement surgery: Is it a real problem?

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Giulia Masci; Gianpiero Cazzato; Michela Florio; Luigi Capasso; Marco Passiatore; Giovanni Autore; Giulio Maccauro; Enrico Pola
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2019-02-18

8.  Improved outcomes in patients with positive metal sensitivity following revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert L Zondervan; Jonathan J Vaux; Michael J Blackmer; Brett G Brazier; Charles J Taunt
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Prevalence of contact allergy to metals in the European general population with a focus on nickel and piercings: The EDEN Fragrance Study.

Authors:  Marie L A Schuttelaar; Robert F Ofenloch; Magnus Bruze; Simone Cazzaniga; Peter Elsner; Margarida Gonçalo; Luigi Naldi; Åke Svensson; Thomas L Diepgen
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Long-term outcome after implantation of a nickel-containing cemented hip stem on the right in a patient with type IV sensitization to nickel sulphate.

Authors:  Sarah Armonies; Dirk Zajonz; Regina Treudler; Andreas Roth; Mohamed Ghanem
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2019-12-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Similar clinical and radiographic outcomes after two different hypoallergenic medial unicompartmental knee in patients with metal allergy.

Authors:  Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Nicola Ursino; Ilaria Mariani; Katia Corona; Filippo Maria Anghilieri; Emanuele Franchi; Lorenzo Monti
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-05-29

2.  Hypoallergenic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and return to sport: comparison between Oxidized Zirconium and Titanium Niobium Nitride.

Authors:  Lorenzo Monti; Manuele Franchi; Nicola Ursino; Ilaria Mariani; Katia Corona; Filippo Maria Anghilieri; Riccardo D'Ambrosi
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-07-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.