Dalibel Bravo1, Eric R Wagner2, Dirk R Larson2, Mark P Davis2, Mark W Pagnano2, Rafael J Sierra2. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether a positive skin patch test for metal allergy in patients with skin hypersensitivity to metals is associated with an increased risk of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) failure. Our aim was to determine whether patients with a history of metal allergy who had a positive skin patch test (SPT+) had worse outcomes after primary TKA compared with those with a negative skin patch test and compared with controls. METHODS: Over 12 years, 127 patients underwent 161 TKA after skin patch testing (SPT; 56 were positive). Cases were matched by age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, implant type, and implant manufacturer to 161 control knee arthroplasties without any prior history of metal allergy and no SPT. Median follow-up was 5.3 years. Differences in outcome measures were assessed between groups. RESULTS: Patients with a SPT+ to metal did not have a higher complication, reoperation, or revision rates compared with patients with a SPT- and matched controls. Survivorship free of revision at 5 years was 98.1% for SPT+; 100% for SPT-; 97.6% for SPT+ controls, 99.0% for SPT- controls. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain between SPT+ and SPT- patients and matched controls. CONCLUSION: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of metal hypersensitivity on TKA outcomes and the role of SPT in patients before TKA. In this study, a SPT+ for metals was of little practical value in predicting the midterm outcome after TKA and cannot be strongly recommended as a method to guide the selection of implant type.
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether a positive skin patch test for metalallergy in patients with skin hypersensitivity to metals is associated with an increased risk of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) failure. Our aim was to determine whether patients with a history of metalallergy who had a positive skin patch test (SPT+) had worse outcomes after primary TKA compared with those with a negative skin patch test and compared with controls. METHODS: Over 12 years, 127 patients underwent 161 TKA after skin patch testing (SPT; 56 were positive). Cases were matched by age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, implant type, and implant manufacturer to 161 control knee arthroplasties without any prior history of metalallergy and no SPT. Median follow-up was 5.3 years. Differences in outcome measures were assessed between groups. RESULTS:Patients with a SPT+ to metal did not have a higher complication, reoperation, or revision rates compared with patients with a SPT- and matched controls. Survivorship free of revision at 5 years was 98.1% for SPT+; 100% for SPT-; 97.6% for SPT+ controls, 99.0% for SPT- controls. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain between SPT+ and SPT- patients and matched controls. CONCLUSION: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of metalhypersensitivity on TKA outcomes and the role of SPT in patients before TKA. In this study, a SPT+ for metals was of little practical value in predicting the midterm outcome after TKA and cannot be strongly recommended as a method to guide the selection of implant type.
Authors: Kenneth L Urish; Nicholas John Giori; Jack E Lemons; William M Mihalko; Nadim Hallab Journal: Orthop Clin North Am Date: 2019-04-16 Impact factor: 2.472
Authors: Peyton Keeling; Brian A Schneiderman; Conrad Lu; Melissa L Wilson; Thomas P Schmalzried Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 4.435