Literature DB >> 21957996

Hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants - diagnostic algorithm and suggested patch test series for clinical use.

Peter C Schalock1, Torkil Menné, Jeanne D Johansen, James S Taylor, Howard I Maibach, Carola Lidén, Magnus Bruze, Jacob P Thyssen.   

Abstract

Cutaneous and systemic hypersensitivity reactions to implanted metals are challenging to evaluate and treat. Although they are uncommon, they do exist, and require appropriate and complete evaluation. This review summarizes the evidence regarding evaluation tools, especially patch and lymphocyte transformation tests, for hypersensitivity reactions to implanted metal devices. Patch test evaluation is the gold standard for metal hypersensitivity, although the results may be subjective. Regarding pre-implant testing, those patients with a reported history of metal dermatitis should be evaluated by patch testing. Those without a history of dermatitis should not be tested unless considerable concern exists. Regarding post-implant testing, a subset of patients with metal hypersensitivity may develop cutaneous or systemic reactions to implanted metals following implant. For symptomatic patients, a diagnostic algorithm to guide the selection of screening allergen series for patch testing is provided. At a minimum, an extended baseline screening series and metal screening is necessary. Static and dynamic orthopaedic implants, intravascular stent devices, implanted defibrillators and dental and gynaecological devices are considered. Basic management suggestions are provided. Our goal is to provide a comprehensive reference for use by those evaluating suspected cutaneous and systemic metal hypersensitivity reactions.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21957996     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01971.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  36 in total

1.  Revision for taper corrosion at the neck-body junction following total hip arthroplasty: pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Mitchell C Weiser; Darwin D Chen
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

Review 2.  Systemic contact dermatitis and allergy to biomedical devices.

Authors:  Marcella Aquino; Tania Mucci
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 3.  Metal hypersensitivity in total hip and knee arthroplasty: Current concepts.

Authors:  Samuel Akil; Jared M Newman; Neil V Shah; Natasha Ahmed; Ajit J Deshmukh; Aditya V Maheshwari
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-10-10

Review 4.  Allergy in Total Knee Replacement. Does It Exist?: Review Article.

Authors:  Martin Faschingbauer; Lisa Renner; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-07-22

5.  Electrochemical study on the corrosion resistance of plasma nanocoated 316L stainless steel in albumin- and lysozyme-containing electrolytes.

Authors:  John Eric Jones; Meng Chen; Ju Chou; Qingsong Yu
Journal:  Curr Top Electrochem       Date:  2017

6.  Nickel-associated delayed multiple white matter lesions after stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial unruptured aneurysm.

Authors:  Hun Soo Park; Ichiro Nakagawa; Shohei Yokoyama; Daisuke Wajima; Takeshi Wada; Yasushi Motoyama; Kimihiko Kichikawa; Hiroyuki Nakase
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-02-20

7.  [Complications of metal-on-metal tribological pairing].

Authors:  M Stiehler; F Zobel; F Hannemann; J Schmitt; J Lützner; S Kirschner; K-P Günther; A Hartmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Chronic allergic contact dermatitis promotes skin cancer.

Authors:  Shadmehr Demehri; Trevor J Cunningham; Eva A Hurst; Andras Schaffer; David M Sheinbein; Wayne M Yokoyama
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  A rare case of pseudotumor formation associated with methyl methacrylate hypersensitivity in a patient following cemented total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shachar Kenan; Leonard Kahn; Noga Haramati; Samuel Kenan
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty: a review of pathogenetic mechanisms.

Authors:  J Gallo; S B Goodman; Y T Konttinen; M A Wimmer; M Holinka
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.