Literature DB >> 30626537

Effect of the humeral neck-shaft angle and glenosphere lateralization on stability of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

Manuel Ferle1, Marc-Frederic Pastor1, Jakob Hagenah1, Christof Hurschler1, Tomas Smith2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lateralizing the glenosphere and decreasing the humeral neck-shaft angles are implant design parameters that reduce the risk of scapular impingement. The effects of these parameters on joint stability remain unclear. This study evaluated the effect of glenosphere lateralization and humeral neck-shaft angle on joint stability by quantifying the anterior dislocation force in different arm positions.
METHODS: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty was performed on 19 human shoulder specimens. Anterior dislocation force and maximum external rotation were evaluated using a robot-based shoulder simulator. By varying the neck-shaft angle and magnitudes of glenosphere lateralization, 12 configurations were analyzed with the glenohumeral joint in 30° and 60° of abduction, in neutral, and in 30° of external rotation.
RESULTS: At 30° of abduction, measurements showed significantly higher dislocation forces for the 9-mm and 6-mm lateralized glenosphere than for the 0-mm (P < .0001, P = .007) nonlateralized glenosphere. At 60° of abduction, measurements showed significantly higher dislocation forces for the 9-mm and 6-mm lateralized glenosphere than for the 0-mm (P < .0001, P = .0007) and 3-mm (P = .0003, P = .04) glenosphere. Configurations with a neck-shaft angle of 135° showed significantly higher dislocation forces than configurations with a neck-shaft angle of 145° (P = .02) or 155° (P = .02) at 30° of abduction in 30° of external rotation. Neck-shaft angle and glenosphere lateralization had no influence on maximum external rotation capability.
CONCLUSION: Glenosphere lateralization significantly increased anterior stability of the glenohumeral joint without influencing the range of passive external rotation. The humeral neck-shaft angle only had a minor effect on anterior stability.
Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reverse shoulder; arthroplasty; biomechanics; lateralization; neck-shaft angle; shoulder; stability

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30626537     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.10.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  13 in total

1.  Radiographic parameters associated with excellent versus poor range of motion outcomes following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Georges Haidamous; Alexandre Lädermann; Robert U Hartzler; Bradford O Parsons; Evan S Lederman; John M Tokish; Patrick J Denard
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-07-09

2.  Treatment of proximal humerus fractures using reverse shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical outcome and tuberosity healing?

Authors:  Malte Holschen; Maria Körting; Patrick Khourdaji; Benjamin Bockmann; Tobias L Schulte; Kai-Axel Witt; Jörn Steinbeck
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  In Vitro Simulation of Shoulder Motion Driven by Three-Dimensional Scapular and Humeral Kinematics.

Authors:  Hema J Sulkar; Tyler W Knighton; Linda Amoafo; Klevis Aliaj; Christopher W Kolz; Yue Zhang; Tucker Hermans; Heath B Henninger
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 4.  [Current trends in reverse fracture arthroplasty].

Authors:  M Warnhoff; G Jensen; H Lill; A Ellwein
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-07-21

Review 5.  Lateralized versus nonlateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yehia H Bedeir; Brian M Grawe; Magdy M Eldakhakhny; Ahmed H Waly
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-07-09

Review 6.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Technique, Decision-Making and Exposure Tips.

Authors:  Harshvardhan Chawla; Seth Gamradt
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-04

7.  Bone grafting in primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the management of glenoid bone loss: A systematic review.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Dimitrios Chytas; Lazaros Kostretzis; Emmanouil Brilakis; Emmanouil Fandridis; Michael Hantes; Emmanouil Antonogiannakis
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-12-10

8.  A comparison of patient-specific instrumentation to navigation for conducting humeral head osteotomies during shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joseph Cavanagh; Jason Lockhart; G Daniel G Langohr; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-07-14

9.  Outcomes after a Grammont-style reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Bradley Hillyard; Victoria Childress; Jun Kawakami; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Peter N Chalmers
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  The effect of metaglene lateralization on joint mobility of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A cadaveric biomechanical study.

Authors:  Nadine Ott; Stephanie Kahmann; Michael Hackl; Stephan Uschok; Lars Peter Müller; Kilian Wegmann
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.