Literature DB >> 33673777

Design and Methodology of the Study of Associated Risks of Stillbirth (SOARS) in Utah.

Carla L DeSisto1, Nicole Stone2, Barbara Algarin2, Laurie Baksh2, Ada Dieke1, Denise V D'Angelo1, Leslie Harrison1, Lee Warner1, Holly B Shulman1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Utah Study of Associated Risks of Stillbirth (SOARS) collects data about stillbirths that are not included in medical records or on fetal death certificates. We describe the design, methods, and survey response rate from the first year of SOARS.
METHODS: The Utah Department of Health identified all Utah women who experienced a stillbirth from June 1, 2018, through May 31, 2019, via fetal death certificates and invited them to participate in SOARS. The research team based the study protocol on the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System surveillance of women with live births and modified it to be sensitive to women's recent experience of a stillbirth. We used fetal death certificates to examine survey response rates overall and by maternal characteristics, gestational age of the fetus, and month in which the loss occurred.
RESULTS: Of 288 women invited to participate in the study, 167 (58.0%) completed the survey; 149 (89.2%) responded by mail and 18 (10.8%) by telephone. A higher proportion of women who were non-Hispanic White (vs other races/ethnicities), were married (vs unmarried), and had ≥high school education (vs <high school education) responded to the survey. Differences between responders and nonresponders by maternal age, gestational age of the fetus, or month of delivery were not significant. Among responders, item nonresponse rates were low (range, 0.6%-5.4%). The question about income (4.8%) and the questions about tests offered and performed during the hospital stay had the highest item nonresponse rates.
CONCLUSIONS: The response rate suggests that a mail- and telephone-based survey can be successful in collecting self-reported information about risk factors for stillbirths not currently included in medical records or fetal death certificates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data collection; fetal death; pregnancy; stillbirth; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33673777      PMCID: PMC8721751          DOI: 10.1177/0033354921994895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  14 in total

1.  Fetal death certificates as a source of surveillance data for stillbirths with birth defects.

Authors:  C Wes Duke; C J Alverson; Anolfo Correa
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Improving surveillance for the hidden half of fetal-infant mortality: a pilot study of the expansion of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System to include stillbirth.

Authors:  Lauren Christiansen-Lindquist; Kashika Sahay; Carol J R Hogue
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Implications for Improving Fetal Death Vital Statistics: Connecting Reporters' Self-Identified Practices and Barriers to Third Trimester Fetal Death Data Quality in New York City.

Authors:  Erica Lee; Amita Toprani; Elizabeth Begier; Richard Genovese; Ann Madsen; Melissa Gambatese
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-02

4.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): Overview of Design and Methodology.

Authors:  Holly B Shulman; Denise V D'Angelo; Leslie Harrison; Ruben A Smith; Lee Warner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Obstetric Care Consensus #10: Management of Stillbirth: (Replaces Practice Bulletin Number 102, March 2009).

Authors:  Torri D Metz; Rana Snipe Berry; Ruth C Fretts; Uma M Reddy; Mark A Turrentine
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  The association of stillbirth with depressive symptoms 6-36 months post-delivery.

Authors:  Carol J R Hogue; Corette B Parker; Marian Willinger; Jeff R Temple; Carla M Bann; Robert M Silver; Donald J Dudley; Janet L Moore; Donald R Coustan; Barbara J Stoll; Uma M Reddy; Michael W Varner; George R Saade; Deborah Conway; Robert L Goldenberg
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.980

7.  Fetal death certificate data quality: a tale of two U.S. counties.

Authors:  Lauren Christiansen-Lindquist; Robert M Silver; Corette B Parker; Donald J Dudley; Matthew A Koch; Uma M Reddy; George R Saade; Robert L Goldenberg; Carol J R Hogue
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Using active birth defects surveillance programs to supplement data on fetal death reports: improving surveillance data on stillbirths.

Authors:  Wes Duke; Laura Williams; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2008-11

Review 9.  Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences.

Authors:  Alexander E P Heazell; Dimitrios Siassakos; Hannah Blencowe; Christy Burden; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Joanne Cacciatore; Nghia Dang; Jai Das; Vicki Flenady; Katherine J Gold; Olivia K Mensah; Joseph Millum; Daniel Nuzum; Keelin O'Donoghue; Maggie Redshaw; Arjumand Rizvi; Tracy Roberts; H E Toyin Saraki; Claire Storey; Aleena M Wojcieszek; Soo Downe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Using an existing birth defects surveillance program to enhance surveillance data on stillbirths.

Authors:  Wes Duke; Suzanne M Gilboa
Journal:  J Registry Manag       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.