| Literature DB >> 26794073 |
Alexander E P Heazell1, Dimitrios Siassakos2, Hannah Blencowe3, Christy Burden4, Zulfiqar A Bhutta5, Joanne Cacciatore6, Nghia Dang7, Jai Das8, Vicki Flenady9, Katherine J Gold10, Olivia K Mensah11, Joseph Millum12, Daniel Nuzum13, Keelin O'Donoghue13, Maggie Redshaw14, Arjumand Rizvi8, Tracy Roberts15, H E Toyin Saraki16, Claire Storey17, Aleena M Wojcieszek9, Soo Downe18.
Abstract
Despite the frequency of stillbirths, the subsequent implications are overlooked and underappreciated. We present findings from comprehensive, systematic literature reviews, and new analyses of published and unpublished data, to establish the effect of stillbirth on parents, families, health-care providers, and societies worldwide. Data for direct costs of this event are sparse but suggest that a stillbirth needs more resources than a livebirth, both in the perinatal period and in additional surveillance during subsequent pregnancies. Indirect and intangible costs of stillbirth are extensive and are usually met by families alone. This issue is particularly onerous for those with few resources. Negative effects, particularly on parental mental health, might be moderated by empathic attitudes of care providers and tailored interventions. The value of the baby, as well as the associated costs for parents, families, care providers, communities, and society, should be considered to prevent stillbirths and reduce associated morbidity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26794073 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00836-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet ISSN: 0140-6736 Impact factor: 79.321