Literature DB >> 28789821

Fetal death certificate data quality: a tale of two U.S. counties.

Lauren Christiansen-Lindquist1, Robert M Silver2, Corette B Parker3, Donald J Dudley4, Matthew A Koch3, Uma M Reddy5, George R Saade6, Robert L Goldenberg7, Carol J R Hogue8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Describe the relative frequency and joint effect of missing and misreported fetal death certificate (FDC) data and identify variations by key characteristics.
METHODS: Stillbirths were prospectively identified during 2006-2008 for a multisite population-based case-control study. For this study, eligible mothers of stillbirths were not incarcerated residents of DeKalb County, Georgia, or Salt Lake County, Utah, aged ≥13 years, with an identifiable FDC. We identified the frequency of missing and misreported (any departure from the study value) FDC data by county, race/ethnicity, gestational age, and whether the stillbirth was antepartum or intrapartum.
RESULTS: Data quality varied by item and was highest in Salt Lake County. Reporting was generally not associated with maternal or delivery characteristics. Reasons for poor data quality varied by item in DeKalb County: some items were frequently missing and misreported; however, others were of poor quality due to either missing or misreported data.
CONCLUSIONS: FDC data suffer from missing and inaccurate data, with variations by item and county. Salt Lake County data illustrate that high quality reporting is attainable. The overall quality of reporting must be improved to support consequential epidemiologic analyses for stillbirth, and improvement efforts should be tailored to the needs of each jurisdiction.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data accuracy; Fetal death; Stillbirth; Vital statistics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28789821      PMCID: PMC5610070          DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  19 in total

1.  Validity of maternal and perinatal risk factors reported on fetal death certificates.

Authors:  Mona T Lydon-Rochelle; Vicky Cárdenas; Jennifer L Nelson; Kay M Tomashek; Beth A Mueller; Thomas R Easterling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Fetal death certificates as a source of surveillance data for stillbirths with birth defects.

Authors:  C Wes Duke; C J Alverson; Anolfo Correa
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Improving surveillance for the hidden half of fetal-infant mortality: a pilot study of the expansion of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System to include stillbirth.

Authors:  Lauren Christiansen-Lindquist; Kashika Sahay; Carol J R Hogue
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Addressing the complexity of disparities in stillbirths.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong; Uma M Reddy; Marian Willinger
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Implications for Improving Fetal Death Vital Statistics: Connecting Reporters' Self-Identified Practices and Barriers to Third Trimester Fetal Death Data Quality in New York City.

Authors:  Erica Lee; Amita Toprani; Elizabeth Begier; Richard Genovese; Ann Madsen; Melissa Gambatese
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-02

6.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.

Authors:  L I Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A comparative study of hospital fetal death records and Washington State fetal death certificates.

Authors:  L Harter; P Starzyk; F Frost
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Understanding perinatal death: a systematic analysis of New York City fetal and neonatal death vital record data and implications for improvement, 2007-2011.

Authors:  Erica J Lee; Melissa Gambatese; Elizabeth Begier; Antonio Soto; Tara Das; Ann Madsen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-10

9.  Using active birth defects surveillance programs to supplement data on fetal death reports: improving surveillance data on stillbirths.

Authors:  Wes Duke; Laura Williams; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2008-11

10.  Fetal and Perinatal Mortality: United States, 2013.

Authors:  Marian F MacDorman; Elizabeth C W Gregory
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2015-07-23
View more
  3 in total

1.  Understanding and detecting defects in healthcare administration data: Toward higher data quality to better support healthcare operations and decisions.

Authors:  Yili Zhang; Güneş Koru
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Design and Methodology of the Study of Associated Risks of Stillbirth (SOARS) in Utah.

Authors:  Carla L DeSisto; Nicole Stone; Barbara Algarin; Laurie Baksh; Ada Dieke; Denise V D'Angelo; Leslie Harrison; Lee Warner; Holly B Shulman
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Persistent inaccuracies in completion of medical certificates of stillbirth: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Lucy E Higgins; Alexander E P Heazell; Melissa K Whitworth
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.980

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.