Literature DB >> 18985684

Using active birth defects surveillance programs to supplement data on fetal death reports: improving surveillance data on stillbirths.

Wes Duke1, Laura Williams, Adolfo Correa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surveillance of stillbirths using fetal death reports (FDRs) has been challenging because of under-reporting of fetal deaths and missing data on the FDRs. Using active case finding and chart abstraction within the infrastructure of established birth defect surveillance programs could potentially enhance the data from FDRs. The data collection form for the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program, an active, population-based birth defects surveillance system, was modified to collect additional information on stillbirths from medical records.
METHODS: The study population was a 25% simple random sample of stillbirths recorded on FDRs in 2004 (n = 125) by residents in the five central counties of metropolitan Atlanta. Stillbirth was defined as a fetal death at > or =20 weeks gestation or > or =350 g if age was unknown. Data on demographic characteristics and risk factors collected from the two sources were compared for completeness and agreement, as well as causes of and conditions associated with the fetal death.
RESULTS: Combining data sources provided more information. Demographic and risk factor variables in the two data sources showed strong agreement (categorical variable, kappa range = 0.79-1.00; continuous variable, correlation coefficient range = 0.61-1.00). The actively ascertained data provided more complete information for causes and conditions of fetal death. Data from the FDRs yielded 42% of cases with no listed cause of death or associated condition compared with 10% using Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program data.
CONCLUSIONS: Expanding the potential of existing active birth defects surveillance programs to include stillbirth surveillance could potentially improve the quantity and quality of available data on fetal deaths. Ongoing studies are needed to corroborate these findings and to assess completeness of case ascertainment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18985684     DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol        ISSN: 1542-0752


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of an active surveillance system for stillbirths in metropolitan Atlanta.

Authors:  Alejandro Azofeifa; Lorraine F Yeung; C Wes Duke; Suzanne M Gilboa; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  J Registry Manag       Date:  2012

2.  Fetal death certificate data quality: a tale of two U.S. counties.

Authors:  Lauren Christiansen-Lindquist; Robert M Silver; Corette B Parker; Donald J Dudley; Matthew A Koch; Uma M Reddy; George R Saade; Robert L Goldenberg; Carol J R Hogue
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Use of active surveillance methodologies to examine over-reporting of stillbirths on fetal death certificates.

Authors:  Jennifer A Makelarski; Paul A Romitti; Kristin M Caspers; Soman Puzhankara; Bradley D McDowell; Kimberly N Piper
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2011-09-30

4.  Understanding perinatal death: a systematic analysis of New York City fetal and neonatal death vital record data and implications for improvement, 2007-2011.

Authors:  Erica J Lee; Melissa Gambatese; Elizabeth Begier; Antonio Soto; Tara Das; Ann Madsen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-10

5.  Using an existing birth defects surveillance program to enhance surveillance data on stillbirths.

Authors:  Wes Duke; Suzanne M Gilboa
Journal:  J Registry Manag       Date:  2014

6.  Design and Methodology of the Study of Associated Risks of Stillbirth (SOARS) in Utah.

Authors:  Carla L DeSisto; Nicole Stone; Barbara Algarin; Laurie Baksh; Ada Dieke; Denise V D'Angelo; Leslie Harrison; Lee Warner; Holly B Shulman
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Improving reporting of infant deaths, maternal deaths and stillbirths in Haryana, India.

Authors:  Preeti H Negandhi; Sutapa B Neogi; Sapna Chopra; Amit Phogat; Rupinder Sahota; Ravikant Gupta; Rakesh Gupta; Sanjay Zodpey
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 9.408

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.