Literature DB >> 33664655

Refining the Behavioral Phenotype of Angelman Syndrome: Examining Differences in Motivation for Social Contact Between Genetic Subgroups.

Mary Heald1, Dawn Adams2, Emily Walls1, Christopher Oliver1.   

Abstract

Angelman syndrome (AS) is caused by loss of information from the 15q11.2-13 region on the maternal chromosome with striking phenotypic difference from Prader-Willi syndrome in which information is lost from the same region on the paternal chromosome. Motivation for social contact and sensory seeking behaviors are often noted as characteristics of the phenotype of AS and it has been argued that the strong drive for social contact supports a kinship theory interpretation of genomic imprinting. In this study we developed an experimental paradigm for quantifying the motivation for social contact in AS and examined differences across the genetic subtypes that cause AS [deletion, imprinting centre defect (ICD), uniparental disomy and UBE3A mutation]. Using single case experimental designs we examined the rate of acquisition of behavioral responses using operant learning paradigms for 21 children with AS whilst systematically varying the nature of social and sensory reinforcement. Variability in rates of acquisition was influenced by the nature of rewarding stimuli. Across the total sample both sensory stimuli and social contact could increase the rate of rewarded behavior with difference between children in the most effective reward. A striking difference in the rewarding properties of social contact across genetic subtypes was evidenced by non-deletion genetic causes of AS showing significantly higher rates of responding than the deletion cause in the social reinforcement paradigm. The results indicate that reinforcer assessment can beneficially inform behavioral interventions and that within syndrome variability in the behavioral phenotype of AS is likely driven by genetic difference. The non-deletion cause of AS, and particularly the ICD group, may be the optimal group for further study of genomic imprinting.
Copyright © 2021 Heald, Adams, Walls and Oliver.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angelman syndrome; behavioral phenotype; genomic imprinting; kinship theory; operant learning; social behavior

Year:  2021        PMID: 33664655      PMCID: PMC7921159          DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.618271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-5153            Impact factor:   3.558


  43 in total

1.  Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.

Authors:  L P Hagopian; K S Rush; A B Lewin; E S Long
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

2.  Genotype and phenotype in Angelman syndrome caused by paternal UPD 15.

Authors:  C Prasad; J Wagstaff
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1997-06-13

3.  Communication development in Angelman's syndrome.

Authors:  N Jolleff; M M Ryan
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Effects of adult familiarity on social behaviours in Angelman syndrome.

Authors:  R Mount; C Oliver; K Berg; K Horsler
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2011-01-23

5.  Angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes share a common chromosome 15 deletion but differ in parental origin of the deletion.

Authors:  J H Knoll; R D Nicholls; R E Magenis; J M Graham; M Lalande; S A Latt
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1989-02

6.  Communication, cognition, and social interaction in the Angelman syndrome.

Authors:  K A Penner; J Johnston; B H Faircloth; P Irish; C A Williams
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1993-04-01

Review 7.  Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Louis P Hagopian; Ethan S Long; Karena S Rush
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2004-09

Review 8.  Angelman syndrome: a review of the clinical and genetic aspects.

Authors:  J Clayton-Smith; L Laan
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Profiles of atypical sensory processing in Angelman, Cornelia de Lange and Fragile X syndromes.

Authors:  M Heald; D Adams; C Oliver
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2019-12-11

10.  Discrimination training reduces high rate social approach behaviors in Angelman syndrome: proof of principle.

Authors:  M Heald; D Allen; D Villa; C Oliver
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2013-03-19
View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of Robotic Interactive Gait Training Combined with Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality on Balance, Gross Motor Function, Gait Kinetic, and Kinematic Characteristics in Angelman Syndrome: A Case Report.

Authors:  Sangkeun Han; Chanhee Park; Joshua Sung H You
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-12

Review 2.  Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Angelman Syndrome.

Authors:  Lili Yang; Xiaoli Shu; Shujiong Mao; Yi Wang; Xiaonan Du; Chaochun Zou
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.096

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.