Literature DB >> 33664369

Restoration of the hip geometry after two-stage exchange with intermediate resection arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection.

Jan Hubert1,2, Frank Timo Beil3,4, Tim Rolvien4, Christian Ries4, Stephan Frosch3, Dominik Saul3,5, Thelonius Hawellek3,4.   

Abstract

Two-stage exchange with intermediate resection arthroplasty (RA) is a well-established surgical procedure in the treatment of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), whereby a higher failure rate of final hip geometry restoration due to tissue contraction is controversially discussed. The aim was to evaluate radiographic changes of hip geometry parameters during PJI treatment and to determine the impact of the intermediate RA on the final joint restoration after reimplantation of a total hip arthroplasty (reTHA). Radiographic parameters (leg length (LL), femoral offset (FO), horizontal/vertical acetabular center of rotation distance (h/vCORD)) of 47 patients (mean age: 64.1 years) were measured on standard radiographs of the pelvis and compared between four different stages during PJI treatment (pre-replacement status (preTHA), primary total hip arthroplasty (pTHA), RA and reTHA). The RA duration (mean: 10.9 months) and the number of reoperations during this period (mean: n = 2.0) as well as their impact on hip geometry restoration were evaluated. Between preTHA and pTHA/reTHA an equivalent restoration was measured regarding the FO (p < 0.001/p < 0.001) and hCORD (p = 0.016/p < 0.001), but not regarding the LL and vCORD. In contrast, analysis revealed no influence of RA and an equivalent reconstruction of LL (p = 0.003), FO (p < 0.001), v/hCORD (p = 0.039/p = 0.035) at reTHA compared to pTHA. Furthermore, RA duration (p = 0.053) and the number of reoperations after RA (p = 0.134) had no impact on radiographic hip geometry restoration. The two-stage exchange with intermediate RA does not alter the preexisting hip joint parameters, whereby a good restoration of the final hip geometry, independent of the duration or the number of reoperations, can be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33664369      PMCID: PMC7933341          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84692-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  58 in total

1.  Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; N V Greidanus; J Antoniou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Can we improve the results of revision arthroplasty for infected total hip replacement?

Authors:  Frantz Langlais
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-07

Review 3.  Prosthetic-joint infections.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli; Andrej Trampuz; Peter E Ochsner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Single- or two-stage revision for infected total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Hugh A C Leonard; Alexander D Liddle; Orlaith Burke; David W Murray; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A temporary antibiotic-loaded joint replacement system for management of complex infections involving the hip.

Authors:  C P Duncan; C Beauchamp
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  The John Charnley Award. Wear is a function of use, not time.

Authors:  T P Schmalzried; E F Shepherd; F J Dorey; W O Jackson; M dela Rosa; F Fa'vae; H A McKellop; C D McClung; J Martell; J R Moreland; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Stability and leg length equality in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew S Austin; William J Hozack; Peter F Sharkey; Richard H Rothman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  The effect of femoral offset modification on gait after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Elhadi Sariali; Shahnaz Klouche; Alexandre Mouttet; Hugues Pascal-Moussellard
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Prospective study of the treatment of infected hip arthroplasties with or without the use of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer.

Authors:  Henrique Berwanger Cabrita; Alberto Tesconi Croci; Olavo Pires de Camargo; Ana Lúcia Lei Munhoz de Lima
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Complications of Resection Arthroplasty in Two-Stage Revision for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection.

Authors:  Irene K Sigmund; Tobias Winkler; Nuri Önder; Carsten Perka; Nora Renz; Andrej Trampuz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.