Joanne Enticott1,2, Alison Johnson3, Helena Teede4,5. 1. Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia. joanne.enticott@monash.edu. 2. Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia. joanne.enticott@monash.edu. 3. Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia. 4. Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia. helena.teede@monash.edu. 5. Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia. helena.teede@monash.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The transition to electronic health records offers the potential for big data to drive the next frontier in healthcare improvement. Yet there are multiple barriers to harnessing the power of data. The Learning Health System (LHS) has emerged as a model to overcome these barriers, yet there remains limited evidence of impact on delivery or outcomes of healthcare. OBJECTIVE: To gather evidence on the effects of LHS data hubs or aligned models that use data to deliver healthcare improvement and impact. Any reported impact on the process, delivery or outcomes of healthcare was captured. METHODS: Systematic review from CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Medline in-process and Web of Science PubMed databases, using learning health system, data hub, data-driven, ehealth, informatics, collaborations, partnerships, and translation terms. English-language, peer-reviewed literature published between January 2014 and Sept 2019 was captured, supplemented by a grey literature search. Eligibility criteria included studies of LHS data hubs that reported research translation leading to health impact. RESULTS: Overall, 1076 titles were identified, with 43 eligible studies, across 23 LHS environments. Most LHS environments were in the United States (n = 18) with others in Canada, UK, Sweden and Australia/NZ. Five (21.7%) produced medium-high level of evidence, which were peer-reviewed publications. CONCLUSIONS: LHS environments are producing impact across multiple continents and settings.
BACKGROUND: The transition to electronic health records offers the potential for big data to drive the next frontier in healthcare improvement. Yet there are multiple barriers to harnessing the power of data. The Learning Health System (LHS) has emerged as a model to overcome these barriers, yet there remains limited evidence of impact on delivery or outcomes of healthcare. OBJECTIVE: To gather evidence on the effects of LHS data hubs or aligned models that use data to deliver healthcare improvement and impact. Any reported impact on the process, delivery or outcomes of healthcare was captured. METHODS: Systematic review from CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Medline in-process and Web of Science PubMed databases, using learning health system, data hub, data-driven, ehealth, informatics, collaborations, partnerships, and translation terms. English-language, peer-reviewed literature published between January 2014 and Sept 2019 was captured, supplemented by a grey literature search. Eligibility criteria included studies of LHS data hubs that reported research translation leading to health impact. RESULTS: Overall, 1076 titles were identified, with 43 eligible studies, across 23 LHS environments. Most LHS environments were in the United States (n = 18) with others in Canada, UK, Sweden and Australia/NZ. Five (21.7%) produced medium-high level of evidence, which were peer-reviewed publications. CONCLUSIONS: LHS environments are producing impact across multiple continents and settings.
Entities:
Keywords:
Digital health; Health data hubs; Health services research; Learning health systems
Authors: Vincent X Liu; John W Morehouse; Gregory P Marelich; Jay Soule; Thomas Russell; Melinda Skeath; Carmen Adams; Gabriel J Escobar; Alan Whippy Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Lynne I Wagner; Julian Schink; Michael Bass; Shalini Patel; Maria Varela Diaz; Nan Rothrock; Timothy Pearman; Richard Gershon; Frank J Penedo; Steven Rosen; David Cella Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Paul J Wallace; Nilay D Shah; Taylor Dennen; Paul A Bleicher; Paul D Bleicher; William H Crown Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Michael F Rayo; Jerry Mansfield; Daniel Eiferman; Traci Mignery; Susan White; Susan D Moffatt-Bruce Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2015-11-13 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Sengwee Toh; Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik; Emily E Harmata; Roy Pardee; Rosalinde Saizan; Elisha Malanga; Jessica L Sturtevant; Casie E Horgan; Jane Anau; Cheri D Janning; Robert D Wellman; R Yates Coley; Andrea J Cook; Anita P Courcoulas; Karen J Coleman; Neely A Williams; Kathleen M McTigue; David Arterburn; James McClay Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2017-12-05
Authors: Stacie Vilendrer; Erika A Saliba-Gustafsson; Steven M Asch; Cati G Brown-Johnson; Samantha M R Kling; Jonathan G Shaw; Marcy Winget; David B Larson Journal: Learn Health Syst Date: 2022-08-23
Authors: Stacie Vilendrer; Anna Lestoquoy; Maja Artandi; Linda Barman; Kendell Cannon; Donn W Garvert; Douglas Halket; Laura M Holdsworth; Sara Singer; Laura Vaughan; Marcy Winget Journal: BMC Prim Care Date: 2022-06-13
Authors: Oliver J Canfell; Kamila Davidson; Clair Sullivan; Elizabeth Eakin; Andrew Burton-Jones Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 3.295