Literature DB >> 27700477

Building a learning health system using clinical registers: a non-technical introduction.

John Ovretveit1, Eugene Nelson2, Brent James3.   

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe how clinical registers were designed and used to serve multiple purposes in three health systems, in order to contribute practical experience for building learning healthcare systems. Design/methodology/approach Case description and comparison of the development and use of clinical registries, drawing on participants' experience and published and unpublished research. Findings Clinical registers and new software systems enable fact-based decisions by patients, clinicians, and managers about better care, as well as new and more economical research. Designing systems to present the data for users' daily work appears to be the key to effective use of the potential afforded by digital data. Research limitations/implications The case descriptions draw on the experience of the authors who were involved in the development of the registers, as well as on published and unpublished research. There is limited data about outcomes for patients or cost-effectiveness. Practical implications The cases show the significant investments which are needed to make effective use of clinical register data. There are limited skills to design and apply the digital systems to make the best use of the systems and to reduce their disadvantages. More use can be made of digital data for quality improvement, patient empowerment and support, and for research. Social implications Patients can use their data combined with other data to self-manage their chronic conditions. There are challenges in designing and using systems so that those with lower health and computer literacy and incomes also benefit from these systems, otherwise the digital revolution may increase health inequalities. Originality/value The paper shows three real examples of clinical registers which have been developed as part of their host health systems' strategies to develop learning healthcare systems. The paper gives a simple non-technical introduction and overview for clinicians, managers, policy-advisors and improvers of what is possible and the challenges, and highlights the need to shape the design and implementation of digital infrastructures in healthcare services to serve users.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical registers; Health information technology; Healthcare; Information technology; Learning health system; Quality improvement; Safety

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27700477     DOI: 10.1108/JHOM-06-2016-0110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Organ Manag        ISSN: 1477-7266


  14 in total

1.  Toward an Information Infrastructure for Global Health Improvement.

Authors:  C P Friedman; J C Rubin; K J Sullivan
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

2.  From "Invented here" to "Use it everywhere!": A Learning health system from bottom and/or top?

Authors:  Christian Colldén; Andreas Hellström
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2022-02-09

3.  Integrated Information System for Early Detection of Maternal Risk Factors Based on Continuum of Care Approach of Mother and Toddler Cohorts.

Authors:  Nyoman Anita Damayanti; Darmawan Setijanto; Arief Hargono; Ratna Dwi Wulandari; Maya Weka Santi; Benny Tjahjono; Aulia Ramadhani
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2019-07-31

4.  A framework for value-creating learning health systems.

Authors:  Matthew Menear; Marc-André Blanchette; Olivier Demers-Payette; Denis Roy
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2019-08-09

5.  Swedish Quality Registry for Caries and Periodontal Diseases - a framework for quality development in dentistry.

Authors:  Inger von Bültzingslöwen; Hans Östholm; Lars Gahnberg; Dan Ericson; Jan L Wennström; Jörgen Paulander
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Using Complexity Assessment to Inform the Development and Deployment of a Digital Dashboard for Schizophrenia Care: Case Study.

Authors:  Andreas Gremyr; Boel Andersson Gäre; Trisha Greenhalgh; Ulf Malm; Johan Thor; Ann-Christine Andersson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Digital Technologies Supporting Person-Centered Integrated Care - A Perspective.

Authors:  John Øvretveit
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 5.120

8.  One size fits none - a qualitative study investigating nine national quality registries' conditions for use in quality improvement, research and interaction with patients.

Authors:  Vibeke Sparring; Emma Granström; Magna Andreen Sachs; Mats Brommels; Monica E Nyström
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Leaders' perspectives on learning health systems: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Joanne Enticott; Sandra Braaf; Alison Johnson; Angela Jones; Helena J Teede
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  A prospective multi-site registry of real-world experience of catheter ablation for treatment of symptomatic paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (Real-AF): design and objectives.

Authors:  Allyson L Varley; Omar Kreidieh; Brigham E Godfrey; Carolyn Whitmire; Susan Thorington; Benjamin D'Souza; Steven Kang; Shrinivas Hebsur; Bipin K Ravindran; Edwin Zishiri; Brett Gidney; Matthew B Sellers; David Singh; Tariq Salam; Mark Metzl; Alex Ro; Jose Nazari; Westby G Fisher; Alexandru Costea; Anthony Magnano; Saumil Oza; Gustavo Morales; Anil Rajendra; Joshua Silverstein; Paul C Zei; Jose Osorio
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.