Literature DB >> 36261240

Choice and Partnership Approach to community mental health and addiction services: a realist-informed scoping review.

Leslie Anne Campbell1,2,3, Sharon E Clark4, Jill Chorney3,4, Debbie Emberly4, Julie MacDonald5, Adrian MacKenzie6,7, Grace Warner8, Lori Wozney3,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Choice and Partnership Approach (CAPA) was developed to create an accessible, child-centred and family-centred model of child and adolescent mental health service delivery that is adaptable to different settings. We sought to describe the state of evidence regarding the extent, outcomes and contextual considerations of CAPA implementation in community mental health services.
DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Published and grey literature were searched using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus and Google to 13 and 20 July 2022, respectively. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included reports focused on the implementation, outcomes (clinical, programme or system) or a discussion of contextual factors that may impact CAPA implementation in either child and adolescent or adult mental health services. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted using a codebook that reflected the five domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and reviewed for agreement and accuracy. Data were synthesised according to the five CFIR domains.
RESULTS: Forty-eight reports describing 36 unique evaluations were included. Evaluations were observational in nature; 10 employed pre-post designs. CAPA implementation, regardless of setting, was largely motivated by long wait times. Characteristics of individuals (eg, staff buy-in or skills) were not reported. Processes of implementation included facilitative leadership, data-informed planning and monitoring and CAPA training. Fidelity to CAPA was infrequently measured (n=9/36) despite available tools. Health system outcomes were most frequently reported (n=28/36); few evaluations (n=7/36) reported clinical outcomes, with only three reporting pre/post CAPA changes.
CONCLUSIONS: Gaps in evidence preclude a systematic review and meta-analysis of CAPA implementation. Measurement of clinical outcomes represents an area for significant improvement in evaluation. Consistent measurement of model fidelity is essential for ensuring the accuracy of outcomes attributed to its implementation. An understanding of the change processes necessary to support implementation would be strengthened by more comprehensive consideration of contextual factors. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child & adolescent psychiatry; MENTAL HEALTH; Organisation of health services

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36261240      PMCID: PMC9582326          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   3.006


  37 in total

1.  Improving quality of a rural CAMHS service using the Choice and Partnership Approach.

Authors:  Jonine Naughton; Soumya Basu; Frank O'Dowd; Matthew Carroll; Darryl Maybery
Journal:  Australas Psychiatry       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 1.369

2.  RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews.

Authors:  Geoff Wong; Trish Greenhalgh; Gill Westhorp; Jeanette Buckingham; Ray Pawson
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 3.  A public health strategy to improve the mental health of Canadian children.

Authors:  Charlotte Waddell; Kimberley McEwan; Cody A Shepherd; David R Offord; Josephine M Hua
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.356

4.  Can we improve service efficiency in CAMHS using the CAPA approach without reducing treatment effectiveness?

Authors:  Peter Fuggle; Annie McHugh; Lucy Gore; Emily Dixon; Daniel Curran; Darren Cutinha
Journal:  J Child Health Care       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 1.979

5.  Child psychiatric epidemiology and Canadian public policy-making: the state of the science and the art of the possible.

Authors:  Charlotte Waddell; David R Offord; Cody A Shepherd; Josephine M Hua; Kimberley McEwan
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.356

6.  Pathways into and through mental health services for children and adolescents.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Z Farmer; Barbara J Burns; Susan D Phillips; Adrian Angold; E Jane Costello
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Erin Lillie; Wasifa Zarin; Kelly K O'Brien; Heather Colquhoun; Danielle Levac; David Moher; Micah D J Peters; Tanya Horsley; Laura Weeks; Susanne Hempel; Elie A Akl; Christine Chang; Jessie McGowan; Lesley Stewart; Lisa Hartling; Adrian Aldcroft; Michael G Wilson; Chantelle Garritty; Simon Lewin; Christina M Godfrey; Marilyn T Macdonald; Etienne V Langlois; Karla Soares-Weiser; Jo Moriarty; Tammy Clifford; Özge Tunçalp; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting.

Authors:  K Hemming; T P Haines; P J Chilton; A J Girling; R J Lilford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-02-06

Review 9.  A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency.

Authors:  Mai T Pham; Andrijana Rajić; Judy D Greig; Jan M Sargeant; Andrew Papadopoulos; Scott A McEwen
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 5.273

10.  Six-Month Prevalence of Mental Disorders and Service Contacts among Children and Youth in Ontario: Evidence from the 2014 Ontario Child Health Study.

Authors:  Katholiki Georgiades; Laura Duncan; Li Wang; Jinette Comeau; Michael H Boyle
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.356

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.