Literature DB >> 33650818

Design and Microfabrication of An On-Chip Oocyte Maturation System for Reduction of Apoptosis.

Behnaz Sadeghzadeh Oskouei1, Siavash Zargari2, Parviz Shahabi3, Marefat Ghaffari Novin4, Maryam Pashaiasl5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In customary assisted reproductive technology (ART), oocyte culture occurs in static micro drops of Petri dishes with vast media volume; while, the in vivo condition is dynamic. In this study, we aimed to improve the maturation efficiency of mammalian oocytes by designing an optimal microchamber array to obtain the integration of oocyte trapping and maturation within a microfluidic device and evaluate the role of microfluidic culture condition in lipid peroxidation level of the culture medium, in vitro matured oocytes apoptosis, and its comparison with the conventional static system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental research, immature oocytes were collected from ovaries of the Naval Medical Research Institute (NMRI) mice. Oocytes were randomly laid in static and dynamic (passive and active) in vitro maturation culture medium for 24 hours. The lipid peroxidation level in oocyte culture media was assessed by measuring the concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA), and the rate of apoptosis in in vitro matured oocytes was assessed by the TUNEL assay after a-24 hour maturation period.
RESULTS: The MDA concentration in both dynamic oocyte maturation media were significantly lower than the static medium (0.003 and 0.002 vs. 0.13 μmol/L, P<0.01). Moreover, the rate of apoptosis in matured oocytes after a-24 hour maturation period was significantly lower in passive dynamic and active dynamic groups compared with the static group (16%, 15% vs. 35%, P<0.01).
CONCLUSION: The dynamic culture for in vitro oocyte maturation (IVM) improves the viability of IVM oocytes in comparison with the static culture condition. Copyright© by Royan Institute. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apoptosis; Assisted Reproductive Technology; In vitro maturation; Microfluidics; Oocyte

Year:  2021        PMID: 33650818      PMCID: PMC7944125          DOI: 10.22074/cellj.2021.7056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell J        ISSN: 2228-5806            Impact factor:   2.479


  32 in total

Review 1.  Fabrication of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane).

Authors:  J C McDonald; D C Duffy; J R Anderson; D T Chiu; H Wu; O J Schueller; G M Whitesides
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 2.  From micro- to nanofabrication with soft materials.

Authors:  S R Quake; A Scherer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-11-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Rethinking in vitro embryo culture: new developments in culture platforms and potential to improve assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Gary D Smith; Shuichi Takayama; Jason E Swain
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  A theoretical model study of the influence of fluid stresses on a cell adhering to a microchannel wall.

Authors:  D P Gaver; S M Kute
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Culture systems: fluid dynamic embryo culture systems (microfluidics).

Authors:  André Monteiro da Rocha; Gary D Smith
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

6.  A method for culture of micromanipulated sheep embryos and its use to produce monozygotic twins.

Authors:  S M Willadsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1979-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Embryo culture: can we perform better than nature?

Authors:  Gábor Vajta; Laura Rienzi; Ana Cobo; John Yovich
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 3.828

8.  Protein supplementation and the incidence of apoptosis and oxidative stress in mouse embryos.

Authors:  Navid Esfandiari; Tommaso Falcone; Ashok Agarwal; Marjan Attaran; David R Nelson; Rakesh K Sharma
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Growth factor expression and function in the human and mouse preimplantation embryo.

Authors:  K Hardy; S Spanos
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.286

10.  Isolation of motile spermatozoa from semen samples using microfluidics.

Authors:  Timothy G Schuster; Brenda Cho; Laura M Keller; Shuichi Takayama; Gary D Smith
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.828

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.