Literature DB >> 12930579

Isolation of motile spermatozoa from semen samples using microfluidics.

Timothy G Schuster1, Brenda Cho, Laura M Keller, Shuichi Takayama, Gary D Smith.   

Abstract

A microfluidic device was designed with two parallel laminar flow channels where non-motile spermatozoa and debris would flow along their initial streamlines and exit one outlet, whereas motile spermatozoa had an opportunity to swim into a parallel stream and exit a separate outlet. Motile sperm samples were prepared with density gradient separation (n = 5). Sperm motility was assessed the following day after exposing aliquots to polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) used to construct the device. There was no difference in sperm motility when compared with unexposed aliquots (P > 0.05). Unprocessed semen samples (n = 10) were placed in wider channels and sperm motility and strict morphology were assessed from sorted outlets. Sperm motility increased from 44 +/- 4.5% to 98 +/- 0.4% (P < 0.05) and morphology increased from 10 +/- 1.05% to 22 +/- 3.3% (P < 0.05) following processing. Finally, density gradient prepared samples (n = 6) containing 5 x 10(6) motile spermatozoa/ml and 50 x 10(6) round immature germ cells/ml were sorted and assessed in a similar fashion. The ratio of motile spermatozoa to round immature germ cells in the wide inlet (1:10) was significantly improved in the thin outlet (33:1) (P < 0.05). This microfluidic device provides a novel method for isolating motile, morphologically normal spermatozoa from semen samples without centrifugation. This technology may prove useful in isolating motile spermatozoa from oligozoospermic samples, even with high amounts of non-motile gamete and/or non-gamete cell contamination. A movie sequence showing streaming and sorting of spermatozoa may be purchased for viewing on the internet at www.rbmonline.com/Article/847 (free to web subscribers).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12930579     DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61732-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  32 in total

Review 1.  Rethinking in vitro embryo culture: new developments in culture platforms and potential to improve assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Gary D Smith; Shuichi Takayama; Jason E Swain
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  Frequency of Sperm DNA Fragmentation According to Selection Method: Comparison and Relevance of a Microfluidic Device and a Swim-up Procedure.

Authors:  Kanako Kishi; Hiromi Ogata; Seiji Ogata; Yuri Mizusawa; Eri Okamoto; Yukiko Matsumoto; Shoji Kokeguchi; Masahide Shiotani
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-11-01

Review 3.  Microfluidics for cryopreservation.

Authors:  Gang Zhao; Jianping Fu
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 14.227

4.  Disrupting the wall accumulation of human sperm cells by artificial corrugation.

Authors:  H A Guidobaldi; Y Jeyaram; C A Condat; M Oviedo; I Berdakin; V V Moshchalkov; L C Giojalas; A V Silhanek; V I Marconi
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Rheotaxis-based separation of sperm with progressive motility using a microfluidic corral system.

Authors:  Meisam Zaferani; Soon Hon Cheong; Alireza Abbaspourrad
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Optimization of a microfluidic spiral channel used to separate sperm from blood cells.

Authors:  Sabin Nepal; Haidong Feng; Bruce K Gale
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  Separation of sperm cells from samples containing high concentrations of white blood cells using a spiral channel.

Authors:  Jiyoung Son; Raheel Samuel; Bruce K Gale; Douglas T Carrell; James M Hotaling
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.800

8.  Positive rheotaxis extended drop: a one-step procedure to select and recover sperm with mature chromatin for intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Hamilton De Martin; Marcello S Cocuzza; Bruno C Tiseo; Guilherme J A Wood; Eduardo P Miranda; Pedro A A Monteleone; José Maria Soares; Paulo C Serafini; Miguel Srougi; Edmund C Baracat
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Microfluidic sample preparation for diagnostic cytopathology.

Authors:  Albert J Mach; Oladunni B Adeyiga; Dino Di Carlo
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 10.  Three-dimensional in vitro follicle growth: overview of culture models, biomaterials, design parameters and future directions.

Authors:  Nina Desai; Anastasia Alex; Faten AbdelHafez; Anthony Calabro; James Goldfarb; Aaron Fleischman; Tommaso Falcone
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.