Listener ratings of the intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech in noise.

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the extent to which listener ratings of the intelligibility of tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) speech vary as a function of different signal-to-noise ratios. Fifty college students, 25 men and 25 women (Median age = 19.7 years) participated in the study. They were instructed to assign numbers to audio-recorded speech samples in each of nine signal-to-noise ratio conditions (+65 dB, +20 dB, +15 dB, +10 dB, +5 dB, 0 dB, -5 dB, -10 dB, and -15 dB) in two separate magnitude estimation scaling tasks. During Task 1 the subjects rated the intelligibility of a TEP speech sample. In Task 2 the subjects rated the intelligibility of a normal speech sample. The results indicated that as the levels of background noise increased, listener ratings of intelligibility decreased (F 8,392 = 37.84; p < or = .0001).