Literature DB >> 33628776

Effect of the Specific Training Course for Competency in Doing Arterial Blood Gas Sampling in the Intensive Care Unit: Developing a Standardized Learning Curve according to the Procedure's Time and Socioprofessional Predictors.

Amir Vahedian-Azimi1, Farshid Rahimi-Bashar2, Mohamad-Amin Pourhoseingholi3, Mahmood Salesi4, Morteza Shamsizadeh5, Tannaz Jamialahmadi6,7, Keivan Gohari-Moghadam8, Amirhossein Sahebkar9,10,11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standardization of clinical practices is an essential part of continuing education of newly registered nurses in the intensive care unit (ICU). The development of educational standards based on evidence can help improve the quality of educational programs and ultimately clinical skills and practices.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to develop a standardized learning curve of arterial blood gas (ABG) sampling competency, to design a checklist for the assessment of competency, to assess the relative importance of predictors and learning patterns of competency, and to determine how many times it is essential to reach a specific level of ABG sampling competency according to the learning curve.
DESIGN: A quasi-experimental, nonrandomized, single-group trial with time series design. Participants. All newly registered nurses in the ICU of a teaching hospital of Tehran University of Medical Sciences were selected from July 2016 to April 2018. Altogether, 65 nurses participated in the study; however, at the end, only nine nurses had dropped out due to shift displacement.
METHODS: At first, the primary checklist was prepared to assess the nurses' ABG sampling practices and it was finalized after three sessions of the expert panel. The checklist had three domains, including presampling, during sampling, and postsampling of ABG competency. Then, 56 nurses practiced ABG sampling step by step under the supervision of three observers who controlled the processes and they filled the checklists. The endpoint was considered reaching a 95 score on the learning curve. The Poisson regression model was used in order to verify the effective factors of ABG sampling competency. The importance of variables in the prediction of practice scores had been calculated in a linear regression of R software by using the relaimpo package.
RESULTS: According to the results, in order to reach a skill level of 55, 65, 75, 85, and 95, nurses, respectively, would need average ABG practice times of 6, 6, 7, 7, and 7. In the linear regression model, demographic variables predict 47.65 percent of changes related to scores in practices but the extent of prediction of these variables totally decreased till 7 practice times, and in each practice, nurses who had the higher primary skill levels gained 1 to 2 skill scores more than those with low primary skills.
CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of the learning curve could be helpful in the standardization of clinical practices in nursing training and optimization of the frequency of skills training, thus improving the training quality in this field. This trial is registered with NCT02830971.
Copyright © 2021 Amir Vahedian-Azimi et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33628776      PMCID: PMC7899780          DOI: 10.1155/2021/2989213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


  21 in total

Review 1.  Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Eamonn Ferguson; David James; Laura Madeley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-20

2.  Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills.

Authors:  Teodor P Grantcharov; Linda Bardram; Peter Funch-Jensen; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Comparison of academic, application form and social factors in predicting early performance on the medical course.

Authors:  Andrew B Lumb; Andy Vail
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Learning curve of laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer, a laparoscopic distal gastrectomy-based analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoqiao Zhang; Nobuhiko Tanigawa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Clinical practice models in nursing education: implication for students' mobility.

Authors:  B Dobrowolska; I McGonagle; C Jackson; R Kane; E Cabrera; D Cooney-Miner; V Di Cara; M Pajnkihar; N Prlić; A K Sigurdardottir; D Kekuš; J Wells; A Palese
Journal:  Int Nurs Rev       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.871

Review 6.  [An overview of clinical practice education models for nursing students: a literature review].

Authors:  Federica Canzan; Oliva Marognolli; Anita Bevilacqua; Francesca Defanti; Elisa Ambrosi; Luisa Cavada; Luisa Saiani
Journal:  Assist Inferm Ric       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.804

7.  Benner's Novice to Expert Model: An Application for Simulation Facilitators.

Authors:  Christine M Thomas; Molly Kellgren
Journal:  Nurs Sci Q       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 0.883

8.  Defining the learning curve for paramedic student endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Henry E Wang; Samuel R Seitz; David Hostler; Donald M Yealy
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.077

9.  Arterial blood gas analysis: mplications for nursing.

Authors:  Fiona Lynch
Journal:  Paediatr Nurs       Date:  2009-02

10.  Evidence-Based Practice Competence in Nursing Students: An Exploratory Study With Important Implications for Educators.

Authors:  Christina K Lam; Carolyn Schubert
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.931

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of specific training course for competency in professional oral hygiene care in the intensive care unit: a quasi-experimental study for developing a standardized learning curve.

Authors:  Abbas Samim; Amir Vahedian-Azimi; Ali Fathi Jouzdani; Farshid Rahimi-Bashar
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 2.376

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.