Literature DB >> 33625362

Awareness and Potential Impacts of the Medicalization of Internet Gaming Disorder: Cross-sectional Survey Among Adolescents in China.

Yanqiu Yu1, Ji-Bin Li2, Joseph T F Lau1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Eleventh Revision of International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) newly listed gaming disorder, including internet gaming disorder (IGD), as a disease. The level of awareness and potential positive and negative impacts of this medicalization among adolescents were unknown.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the levels, associated factors, and potential positive and negative impacts of awareness of the medicalization of IGD among adolescents in China.
METHODS: In a cross-sectional survey, 1343 middle school students in Guangzhou, China, self-administered an anonymous questionnaire in classrooms (October to December 2019). Three risk subgroups were identified: those who scored ≥5 items in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition checklist (IGD-S), those who self-perceived having IGD currently (IGD-PC), and those who self-perceived having IGD within 12 months (IGD-P12M).
RESULTS: Of the internet gamers, 48.3% (460/952) were aware of the medicalization of IGD; they were more likely to belong to the IGD-P12M/IGD-S risk subgroups. Within the IGD-PC/IGD-P12M (but not IGD-S) risk subgroups, IGD medicalization awareness was positively associated with favorable outcomes (reduced internet gaming time in the past 12 months, seeking help from professionals if having IGD, and fewer maladaptive cognitions). After being briefed about the ICD-11 inclusion of IGD, 54.2% (516/952) and 32.8% (312/952) expressed that it would lead to the reduction of gaming time and help-seeking behaviors, respectively; however, 17.9% (170/952), 21.5% (205/952), 15.9% (151/952), and 14.5% (138/952) perceived self-doubt for being diseased, stronger pressure from family members, negative emotional responses, and labeling effect, respectively. With a few exceptions, such perceived positive or negative impacts were stronger among the IGD-S, IGD-PC, and IGD-P12M risk subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: The exploratory study shows that the medicalization of IGD may have benefits that need maximization and potentially harmful effects that need minimization. Future studies should test the efficacies of health promotion that increases IGD medicalization awareness. ©Yanqiu Yu, Ji-Bin Li, Joseph T F Lau. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 24.02.2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; ICD; ICD-11; adolescent; awareness; disease awareness; disorder; game; gaming disorder; high-risk subgroups; impact; internet gaming; medicalization; young adult

Year:  2021        PMID: 33625362      PMCID: PMC7946591          DOI: 10.2196/22393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Internet Res        ISSN: 1438-8871            Impact factor:   5.428


  28 in total

1.  Can medicalization be good? Situating medicalization within bioethics.

Authors:  John Z Sadler; Fabrice Jotterand; Simon Craddock Lee; Stephen Inrig
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2009

2.  Problematic internet use and problematic online gaming are not the same: findings from a large nationally representative adolescent sample.

Authors:  Orsolya Király; Mark D Griffiths; Róbert Urbán; Judit Farkas; Gyöngyi Kökönyei; Zsuzsanna Elekes; Domokos Tamás; Zsolt Demetrovics
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw       Date:  2014-12

3.  Evaluation of the diagnostic criteria of Internet gaming disorder in the DSM-5 among young adults in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Ko; Ju-Yu Yen; Sue-Huei Chen; Peng-Wei Wang; Cheng-Sheng Chen; Cheng-Fang Yen
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 4.  Mental illness stigma: concepts, consequences, and initiatives to reduce stigma.

Authors:  Nicolas Rüsch; Matthias C Angermeyer; Patrick W Corrigan
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 5.361

5.  Common sense model of mental illness: Understanding the impact of cognitive and emotional representations of mental illness on recovery through the mediation of self-stigma.

Authors:  Randolph C H Chan; Winnie W S Mak
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  Inclusion of Gaming Disorder in ICD has more advantages than disadvantages.

Authors:  Orsolya Király; Zsolt Demetrovics
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.756

7.  Problematic gaming exists and is an example of disordered gaming.

Authors:  Mark D Griffiths; Daria J Kuss; Olatz Lopez-Fernandez; Halley M Pontes
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.756

8.  Both sides of the story: Addiction is not a pastime activity.

Authors:  Kai W Müller; Klaus Wölfling
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 6.756

9.  Is video gaming, or video game addiction, associated with depression, academic achievement, heavy episodic drinking, or conduct problems?

Authors:  Geir Scott Brunborg; Rune Aune Mentzoni; Lars Roar Frøyland
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 6.756

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Problematic use of the internet in low- and middle-income countries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review.

Authors:  Biljana Gjoneska; Marc N Potenza; Julia Jones; Célia M D Sales; Georgi Hranov; Zsolt Demetrovics
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2022-07-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.