Literature DB >> 27644016

Common sense model of mental illness: Understanding the impact of cognitive and emotional representations of mental illness on recovery through the mediation of self-stigma.

Randolph C H Chan1, Winnie W S Mak2.   

Abstract

The present study applied the common sense model to understand the underlying mechanism of how cognitive and emotional representations of mental illness among people in recovery of mental illness would impact their endorsement of self-stigma, and how that would, in turn, affect clinical and personal recovery. A cross-sectional survey was administered to 376 people in recovery. Participants were recruited from seven public specialty outpatient clinics and substance abuse assessment clinics across various districts in Hong Kong. They were asked to report their perception towards their mental illness, self-stigma, symptom severity, and personal recovery. The results of structural equation modeling partially supported the hypothesized mediation model indicating that controllability, consequences, and emotional concern of mental illness, but not cause, timeline, and identity, were associated with self-stigma, which was subsequently negatively associated with clinical and personal recovery. The present study demonstrated the mediating role of self-stigma in the relationship between individuals' illness representations towards their mental illness and their recovery. Illness management programs aimed at addressing the maladaptive mental illness-related beliefs and emotions are recommended. Implications on developing self-directed and empowering mental health services are discussed.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical recovery; Common sense model; Illness perception; Personal recovery; Self-stigma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27644016     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  7 in total

1.  Self-stigma in Serious Mental Illness: A Systematic Review of Frequency, Correlates, and Consequences.

Authors:  Julien Dubreucq; Julien Plasse; Nicolas Franck
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 2.  Relationship Between Illness Representations, Psychosocial Adjustment, and Treatment Outcomes in Mental Disorders: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Priscillia Averous; Elodie Charbonnier; Lionel Dany
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-06-12

3.  Cognitive, Regulatory, and Interpersonal Mechanisms of HIV Stigma on the Mental and Social Health of Men Who Have Sex With Men Living With HIV.

Authors:  Randolph C H Chan; Winnie W S Mak
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2019-10

4.  Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of a Community-Based Addiction Rehabilitation Electronic System in Substance Use Disorder: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Xiaomin Xu; Shujuan Chen; Junning Chen; Zhikang Chen; Liming Fu; Dingchen Song; Min Zhao; Haifeng Jiang
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.773

5.  Can psychological flexibility and prosociality mitigate illness perceptions toward COVID-19 on mental health? A cross-sectional study among Hong Kong adults.

Authors:  Yuen Yu Chong; Wai Tong Chien; Ho Yu Cheng; Angelos P Kassianos; Andrew T Gloster; Maria Karekla
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 4.185

6.  Feasibility of a Mobile Phone App to Support Recovery From Addiction in China: Secondary Analysis of a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Hui Han; Jing Ying Zhang; Yih-Ing Hser; Di Liang; Xu Li; Shan Shan Wang; Jiang Du; Min Zhao
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.773

7.  Awareness and Potential Impacts of the Medicalization of Internet Gaming Disorder: Cross-sectional Survey Among Adolescents in China.

Authors:  Yanqiu Yu; Ji-Bin Li; Joseph T F Lau
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 5.428

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.