Literature DB >> 18083294

Validation of the contemporary epstein criteria for insignificant prostate cancer in European men.

Claudio Jeldres1, Nazareno Suardi, Jochen Walz, Georg C Hutterer, Sascha Ahyai, Jean-Baptiste Lattouf, Alexander Haese, Markus Graefen, Andreas Erbersdobler, Hans Heinzer, Hartwig Huland, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Epstein criteria represent the most widely used scheme for prediction of clinically insignificant prostate cancer (PCa). However, they were never validated in European men. We assessed the rate of unfavorable prostate cancer (Gleason 7-10 or non-organ-confined disease) in a cohort of 366 men who fulfilled the Epstein clinically insignificant PCa criteria.
METHODS: Between 1996 and 2006, 2580 men underwent radical prostatectomy at a single academic European institution. Of those, 366 fulfilled the contemporary Epstein clinically insignificant PCa criteria. Analyses targeted the rate of pathologically unfavorable prostate cancer, defined as either Gleason sum 7-10 or non-organ-confined disease, or a combination of these characteristics in patients with clinically insignificant PCa.
RESULTS: Gleason 7-10 prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy was found in 88 patients (24%) with clinically insignificant PCa. In addition, 30 (34.1%) of the 88 patients harboured non-organ-confined disease. Consequently, the contemporary Epstein criteria for clinically insignificant PCa were inaccurate in 24% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The Epstein clinical insignificant PCa criteria may underestimate the true nature of prostate cancer in as many as 24% of European patients. Therefore, caution is advised when treatment decisions are based solely on these criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18083294     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.11.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  33 in total

1.  Validation of revised Epstein's criteria for insignificant prostate cancer prediction in a Greek subpopulation.

Authors:  Κ Chondros; Ν Karpathakis; Ι Heretis; Ε Mavromanolakis; N Chondros; F Sofras; C Mamoulakis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  Validation of Epstein criteria of insignificant prostate cancer in Middle East patients.

Authors:  Ihab A Hekal; Nasr A El-Tabey; Mohamed Adel Nabeeh; Ahmed El-Assmy; Mohamed Abd El-Hameed; Adel Nabeeh; Elhousseiny I Ibrahiem
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Prostate cancer: treatment triggers for patients on active surveillance.

Authors:  William M Hilton; Dipen J Parekh
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Prostate cancer screening: Canadian guidelines 2011.

Authors:  Jonathan I Izawa; Laurence Klotz; D Robert Siemens; Wassim Kassouf; Alan So; John Jordan; Michael Chetner; Alla E Iansavichene
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Biomarker research in prostate cancer--towards utility, not futility.

Authors:  Sheng Fei Oon; Stephen R Pennington; John M Fitzpatrick; R William G Watson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Formalized prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer: is it possible?

Authors:  Carvell T Nguyen; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 7.  [Focal therapy for prostate cancer in Germany - 2014 status].

Authors:  A Roosen; R Ganzer; B Hadaschik; J Köllermann; A Blana; T Henkel; A-B Liehr; D Baumunk; S Machtens; G Salomon; L Sentker; U Witsch; K U Köhrmann; M Schostak
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Adverse Pathologic Features at Radical Prostatectomy: Effect of Preoperative Risk on Oncologic Outcomes.

Authors:  Mariam Imnadze; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  [Trends in prostate biopsy interpretation].

Authors:  J Köllermann; G Sauter
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Pathologic results of radical prostatectomies in patients with simultaneous atypical small acinar proliferation and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kwang Ho Kim; Yun Beom Kim; Jeong Kee Lee; Yoon Jung Kim; Tae Young Jung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.