Literature DB >> 35393568

The current role of MRI for guiding active surveillance in prostate cancer.

Guillaume Ploussard1,2,3, Olivier Rouvière4, Morgan Rouprêt5,6, Roderick van den Bergh7, Raphaële Renard-Penna5,8.   

Abstract

Active surveillance (AS) is the recommended treatment option for low-risk and favourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer management, preserving oncological and functional outcomes. However, active monitoring using relevant parameters in addition to the usual clinical, biological and pathological considerations is necessary to compensate for initial undergrading of the tumour or to detect early progression without missing the opportunity to provide curative therapy. Indeed, several studies have raised concerns about inadequate biopsy sampling at diagnosis. However, the implementation of baseline MRI and targeted biopsy have led to improved initial stratification of low-risk disease; baseline MRI correlates well with disease characteristics and AS outcomes. The use of follow-up MRI during the surveillance phase also raises the question of the requirement for serial biopsies in the absence of radiological progression and the possibility of using completely MRI-based surveillance, with triggers for biopsies based solely on MRI findings. This concept of a tailored-risk, imaging-based monitoring strategy is aimed at reducing invasive procedures. However, the abandonment of serial biopsies in the absence of MRI progression can probably not yet be recommended in routine practice, as the data from real-life cohorts are heterogeneous and inconclusive. Thus, the evolution towards a routine, fully MRI-guided AS pathway has to be preceded by ensuring quality programme assessment for MRI reading and by demonstrating its safety in prospective trials.
© 2022. Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35393568     DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00587-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   16.430


  72 in total

1.  Multifocality and prostate cancer detection by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology.

Authors:  Jesse D Le; Nelly Tan; Eugene Shkolyar; David Y Lu; Lorna Kwan; Leonard S Marks; Jiaoti Huang; Daniel J A Margolis; Steven S Raman; Robert E Reiter
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Minhaj Siddiqui; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Arvin K George; Jason Rothwax; Nabeel Shakir; Chinonyerem Okoro; Dima Raskolnikov; Howard L Parnes; W Marston Linehan; Maria J Merino; Richard M Simon; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study.

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Philippe Puech; Raphaële Renard-Penna; Michel Claudon; Catherine Roy; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Myriam Decaussin-Petrucci; Marine Dubreuil-Chambardel; Laurent Magaud; Laurent Remontet; Alain Ruffion; Marc Colombel; Sébastien Crouzet; Anne-Marie Schott; Laurent Lemaitre; Muriel Rabilloud; Nicolas Grenier
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  In-parallel comparative evaluation between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, prostate cancer antigen 3 and the prostate health index in predicting pathologically confirmed significant prostate cancer in men eligible for active surveillance.

Authors:  Francesco Porpiglia; Francesco Cantiello; Stefano De Luca; Matteo Manfredi; Andrea Veltri; Filippo Russo; Antonino Sottile; Rocco Damiano
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Combined multiparametric MRI and targeted biopsies improve anterior prostate cancer detection, staging, and grading.

Authors:  Adil Ouzzane; Philippe Puech; Laurent Lemaitre; Xavier Leroy; Pierre Nevoux; Nacim Betrouni; Georges-Pascal Haber; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.

Authors:  Nicolas Mottet; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Erik Briers; Thomas Van den Broeck; Marcus G Cumberbatch; Maria De Santis; Stefano Fanti; Nicola Fossati; Giorgio Gandaglia; Silke Gillessen; Nikos Grivas; Jeremy Grummet; Ann M Henry; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Thomas B Lam; Michael Lardas; Matthew Liew; Malcolm D Mason; Lisa Moris; Daniela E Oprea-Lager; Henk G van der Poel; Olivier Rouvière; Ivo G Schoots; Derya Tilki; Thomas Wiegel; Peter-Paul M Willemse; Philip Cornford
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Masoom A Haider; Anwar R Padhani; Geert Villeirs; Katarzyna J Macura; Clare M Tempany; Peter L Choyke; Francois Cornud; Daniel J Margolis; Harriet C Thoeny; Sadhna Verma; Jelle Barentsz; Jeffrey C Weinreb
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 8.  Advances in the selection of patients with prostate cancer for active surveillance.

Authors:  James L Liu; Hiten D Patel; Nora M Haney; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Antti S Rannikko; Marcelo Borghi; Valeria Panebianco; Lance A Mynderse; Markku H Vaarala; Alberto Briganti; Lars Budäus; Giles Hellawell; Richard G Hindley; Monique J Roobol; Scott Eggener; Maneesh Ghei; Arnauld Villers; Franck Bladou; Geert M Villeirs; Jaspal Virdi; Silvan Boxler; Grégoire Robert; Paras B Singh; Wulphert Venderink; Boris A Hadaschik; Alain Ruffion; Jim C Hu; Daniel Margolis; Sébastien Crouzet; Laurence Klotz; Samir S Taneja; Peter Pinto; Inderbir Gill; Clare Allen; Francesco Giganti; Alex Freeman; Stephen Morris; Shonit Punwani; Norman R Williams; Chris Brew-Graves; Jonathan Deeks; Yemisi Takwoingi; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 176.079

10.  Reporting Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: The PRECISE Recommendations-A Report of a European School of Oncology Task Force.

Authors:  Caroline M Moore; Francesco Giganti; Peter Albertsen; Clare Allen; Chris Bangma; Alberto Briganti; Peter Carroll; Masoom Haider; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Alex Kirkham; Laurence Klotz; Adil Ouzzane; Anwar R Padhani; Valeria Panebianco; Peter Pinto; Philippe Puech; Antti Rannikko; Raphaele Renard-Penna; Karim Touijer; Baris Turkbey; Heinrik van Poppel; Riccardo Valdagni; Jochen Walz; Ivo Schoots
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.