Literature DB >> 32100208

Odor span task in dogs (Canis familiaris).

Sarah Krichbaum1, Bart Rogers2, Emma Cox3, L Paul Waggoner2, Jeffrey S Katz3.   

Abstract

Working memory is essential for organisms to solve problems related to their survival and to adapt to changes in their environment. Researchers sought to create a non-human model of working memory that could be used to better understand its predictive value and underlying brain function. Several of these studies were conducted using the odor span task (OST) with rodents, and here, we present the first OST with domestic dogs (n = 6). The OST is an incrementing non-match-to-sample task in which dogs were presented with both a session novel (S +) and a previously encountered (S -) odor on each trial. A response to the session novel odor was always reinforced. Upon meeting training criterion on sessions with 24 trials or odors to remember, the dogs were tested on the OST with up to 72 odors to remember in the session. All dogs learned the OST and displayed accurate performance (≥ 79%) for the largest set size of 72 odors. In an analysis focused on the effect of intervening odors (i.e., the number of trials since the S - was last encountered), dogs demonstrated above-chance performance for up to eight intervening odors. The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of dog working memory for odors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dog; Non-match-to-sample; Odor span task; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32100208     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-020-01362-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  20 in total

1.  Neurotoxic hippocampal lesions have no effect on odor span and little effect on odor recognition memory but produce significant impairments on spatial span, recognition, and alternation.

Authors:  P A Dudchenko; E R Wood; H Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Nonverbal Working Memory for Novel Images in Rhesus Monkeys.

Authors:  Ryan J Brady; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  An overview of the tasks used to test working memory in rodents.

Authors:  Paul A Dudchenko
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 4.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

5.  The many faces of working memory and short-term storage.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

6.  Predicting behavioral changes associated with age-related cognitive impairment in dogs.

Authors:  M J Bain; B L Hart; K D Cliff; W W Ruehl
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 1.936

7.  Visuospatial impairments in aged canines (Canis familiaris): the role of cognitive-behavioral flexibility.

Authors:  Alan D F Chan; Pria M D Nippak; Heather Murphey; Candace J Ikeda-Douglas; Bruce Muggenburg; Elizabeth Head; Carl W Cotman; Norton W Milgram
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Increasing arousal enhances inhibitory control in calm but not excitable dogs.

Authors:  Emily E Bray; Evan L MacLean; Brian A Hare
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Working Memory Systems in the Rat.

Authors:  Alexander Bratch; Spencer Kann; Joshua A Cain; Jie-En Wu; Nilda Rivera-Reyes; Stefan Dalecki; Diana Arman; Austin Dunn; Shiloh Cooper; Hannah E Corbin; Amanda R Doyle; Matthew J Pizzo; Alexandra E Smith; Jonathon D Crystal
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  The Magic Number 70 (plus or minus 20): Variables Determining Performance in the Rodent Odor Span Task.

Authors:  L Brooke April; Katherine Bruce; Mark Galizio
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2013-08-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  The olfactory capability of dogs to discriminate between different quantities of food.

Authors:  Shayla M Jackson; Glynis K Martin; William A Roberts
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Greater dependence on working memory and restricted familiarity in orangutans compared with rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Ryan J Brady; Jennifer M Mickelberg; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.699

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.