Literature DB >> 28052925

ProQ3D: improved model quality assessments using deep learning.

Karolis Uziela1, David Menéndez Hurtado1, Nanjiang Shu1,2, Björn Wallner3, Arne Elofsson1.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Protein quality assessment is a long-standing problem in bioinformatics. For more than a decade we have developed state-of-art predictors by carefully selecting and optimising inputs to a machine learning method. The correlation has increased from 0.60 in ProQ to 0.81 in ProQ2 and 0.85 in ProQ3 mainly by adding a large set of carefully tuned descriptions of a protein. Here, we show that a substantial improvement can be obtained using exactly the same inputs as in ProQ2 or ProQ3 but replacing the support vector machine by a deep neural network. This improves the Pearson correlation to 0.90 (0.85 using ProQ2 input features).
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: ProQ3D is freely available both as a webserver and a stand-alone program at http://proq3.bioinfo.se/. CONTACT: arne@bioinfo.se. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28052925     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  43 in total

Review 1.  Automated Modeling and Validation of Protein Complexes in Cryo-EM Maps.

Authors:  Tristan Cragnolini; Aaron Sweeney; Maya Topf
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  Designing a less immunogenic nattokinase from Bacillus subtilis subsp. natto: a computational mutagenesis.

Authors:  Yoanes Maria Vianney; Stanley Evander Emeltan Tjoa; Reza Aditama; Sulisyto Emantoko Dwi Putra
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  VoroMQA web server for assessing three-dimensional structures of proteins and protein complexes.

Authors:  Kliment Olechnovič; Česlovas Venclovas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Estimation of model accuracy in CASP13.

Authors:  Jianlin Cheng; Myong-Ho Choe; Arne Elofsson; Kun-Sop Han; Jie Hou; Ali H A Maghrabi; Liam J McGuffin; David Menéndez-Hurtado; Kliment Olechnovič; Torsten Schwede; Gabriel Studer; Karolis Uziela; Česlovas Venclovas; Björn Wallner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-07-16

5.  Proteomic Tools for the Analysis of Cytoskeleton Proteins.

Authors:  Carlos Barreto; Andriele Silva; Eliza Wiech; Antonio Lopez; Avdar San; Shaneen Singh
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  Assessment of domain interactions in the fourteenth round of the Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP14).

Authors:  R Dustin Schaeffer; Lisa Kinch; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2021-09-15

7.  Using steered molecular dynamic tension for assessing quality of computational protein structure models.

Authors:  Lyman Monroe; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.672

8.  Improved Protein Model Quality Assessment By Integrating Sequential And Pairwise Features Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Xiaoyang Jing; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Protein Structure Refinement Using Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization with Decomposition Strategy.

Authors:  Cheng-Peng Zhou; Di Wang; Xiaoyong Pan; Hong-Bin Shen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Computational structure prediction provides a plausible mechanism for electron transfer by the outer membrane protein Cyc2 from Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans.

Authors:  Virginia Jiang; Sagar D Khare; Scott Banta
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 6.993

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.