Literature DB >> 33617830

Physical modeling of multivalent interactions in the nuclear pore complex.

Luke K Davis1, Anđela Šarić2, Bart W Hoogenboom3, Anton Zilman4.   

Abstract

In the nuclear pore complex, intrinsically disordered proteins (FG Nups), along with their interactions with more globular proteins called nuclear transport receptors (NTRs), are vital to the selectivity of transport into and out of the cell nucleus. Although such interactions can be modeled at different levels of coarse graining, in vitro experimental data have been quantitatively described by minimal models that describe FG Nups as cohesive homogeneous polymers and NTRs as uniformly cohesive spheres, in which the heterogeneous effects have been smeared out. By definition, these minimal models do not account for the explicit heterogeneities in FG Nup sequences, essentially a string of cohesive and noncohesive polymer units, and at the NTR surface. Here, we develop computational and analytical models that do take into account such heterogeneity in a minimal fashion and compare them with experimental data on single-molecule interactions between FG Nups and NTRs. Overall, we find that the heterogeneous nature of FG Nups and NTRs does play a role in determining equilibrium binding properties but is of much greater significance when it comes to unbinding and binding kinetics. Using our models, we predict how binding equilibria and kinetics depend on the distribution of cohesive blocks in the FG Nup sequences and of the binding pockets at the NTR surface, with multivalency playing a key role. Finally, we observe that single-molecule binding kinetics has a rather minor influence on the diffusion of NTRs in polymer melts consisting of FG-Nup-like sequences.
Copyright © 2021 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33617830      PMCID: PMC8204217          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.01.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  56 in total

1.  Membrane lateral mobility obstructed by polymer-tethered lipids studied at the single molecule level.

Authors:  M A Deverall; E Gindl; E-K Sinner; H Besir; J Ruehe; M J Saxton; C A Naumann
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  The Role of Cohesiveness in the Permeability of the Spatial Assemblies of FG Nucleoporins.

Authors:  Chad Gu; Andrei Vovk; Tiantian Zheng; Rob D Coalson; Anton Zilman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Biomechanics of the transport barrier in the nuclear pore complex.

Authors:  George J Stanley; Ariberto Fassati; Bart W Hoogenboom
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 7.727

4.  Deciphering the "Fuzzy" Interaction of FG Nucleoporins and Transport Factors Using Small-Angle Neutron Scattering.

Authors:  Samuel Sparks; Deniz B Temel; Michael P Rout; David Cowburn
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Intrinsically disordered nuclear pore proteins show ideal-polymer morphologies and dynamics.

Authors:  Luke K Davis; Ian J Ford; Anđela Šarić; Bart W Hoogenboom
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.529

6.  FG-rich repeats of nuclear pore proteins form a three-dimensional meshwork with hydrogel-like properties.

Authors:  Steffen Frey; Ralf P Richter; Dirk Görlich
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Bistable collective behavior of polymers tethered in a nanopore.

Authors:  Dino Osmanovic; Joe Bailey; Anthony H Harker; Ariberto Fassati; Bart W Hoogenboom; Ian J Ford
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2012-06-21

8.  Structural basis for the interaction between NTF2 and nucleoporin FxFG repeats.

Authors:  Richard Bayliss; Sara W Leung; Rosanna P Baker; B Booth Quimby; Anita H Corbett; Murray Stewart
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 9.  Components and regulation of nuclear transport processes.

Authors:  Bastien Cautain; Richard Hill; Nuria de Pedro; Wolfgang Link
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.542

10.  The liquid state of FG-nucleoporins mimics permeability barrier properties of nuclear pore complexes.

Authors:  Giorgia Celetti; Giulia Paci; Joana Caria; Virginia VanDelinder; George Bachand; Edward A Lemke
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  6 in total

1.  Crowding-induced phase separation of nuclear transport receptors in FG nucleoporin assemblies.

Authors:  Luke K Davis; Ian J Ford; Bart W Hoogenboom
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Spatiotemporal gating of Stat nuclear influx by Drosophila Npas4 in collective cell migration.

Authors:  Jhen-Wei Wu; Chueh-Wen Wang; Ruo-Yu Chen; Liang-Yi Hung; Yu-Chen Tsai; Yu-Ting Chan; Yu-Chiuan Chang; Anna C-C Jang
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 14.957

3.  Physics of the Nuclear Pore Complex: Theory, Modeling and Experiment.

Authors:  Bart W Hoogenboom; Loren E Hough; Edward A Lemke; Roderick Y H Lim; Patrick R Onck; Anton Zilman
Journal:  Phys Rep       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 30.510

4.  Free energy calculations shed light on the nuclear pore complex's selective barrier nature.

Authors:  Atsushi Matsuda; Mohammad R K Mofrad
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 3.699

Review 5.  On the nuclear pore complex and its emerging role in cellular mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Atsushi Matsuda; Mohammad R K Mofrad
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2022-03-10

Review 6.  Function of the Nuclear Transport Machinery in Maintaining the Distinctive Compositions of the Nucleus and Cytoplasm.

Authors:  Murray Stewart
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.