Literature DB >> 11465436

Analysis of the osseous/metal interface of drill free screws and self-tapping screws.

W Heidemann1, H Terheyden, K L Gerlach.   

Abstract

AIM: A comparison of metal/osseous interface and bone remodelling after insertion of different types of titanium bone screws in vivo. MATERIAL: Samples of five of each of the following bone screw types were inserted into the anterior wall of the frontal sinus of five Göttingen minipigs: self-tapping micro- (1.5mm) and miniscrews (2.0 mm) or drill free micro- (1.5 mm) and miniscrews (2.0 mm) (Martin Medizintechnik, Tuttlingen, Germany). Screw length was 7mm.
METHODS: Sequential intraperitoneal injections of fluorochromes were performed between the second and ninth postoperative week. After 6 months the pigs were sacrificed, the screw-bone-blocks resected, and microradiographic, histological and fluorescence microscopical examinations were carried out.
RESULTS: Using drill free screws, mean screw/bone contact was 88.4% (miniscrews), or 93.8% (microscrews). With self-tapping miniscrews it was 54.9%, but in microscrews 81%; the differences were statistically significant (t-test: p<0.05). By fluorescence microscopy, the amount of bone remodelling (ratio of residual vs. newly formed bone) was measured. Significantly more of the residual bone was found in the region of the screw threads using drill free screws (miniscrews: mean 71.8%, microscrews: mean 67.9%) than in the region of screw threads with self-tapping screws (miniscrews: mean 33.1%, microscrews: mean 42.4%).
CONCLUSION: The present data support the view that screw/bone contact with drill free screws was superior to that of self-tapping screws; the greater amount of original bone in the threads of drill free screws demonstrated that the insertion of drill free screws did not cause harm to the surrounding bone. Both results are important for osteosynthesis in regions where thin cortical bone is present, such as the central midface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11465436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  10 in total

1.  Experimental in vivo acute and chronic biomechanical and histomorphometrical comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws.

Authors:  Maximiliano Aguiar Porto; Patrícia Silva; Rodrigo Rosa; José Batista Volpon; Antônio Carlos Shimano; Francisco José Albuquerque de Paula; Helton Luiz Aparecido Defino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Stability comparison between commercially available mini-implants and a novel design: part 1.

Authors:  Christine Hong; Haofu Lee; Richard Webster; Jinny Kwak; Benjamin M Wu; Won Moon
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Surface changes of anodic oxidized orthodontic titanium miniscrew.

Authors:  Sung-Hwan Choi; Jung-Yul Cha; Uk-Hyon Joo; Chung-Ju Hwang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Self-Drilling Versus Self-Tapping Screws: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Vineeth K Kumar; Kavitha Prasad; Tanvy Sansgiri; K Ranganath; V Shwetha; Kubra Al-Khuteja
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-04-12

5.  Mini-implants in the anchorage armamentarium: new paradigms in the orthodontics.

Authors:  Masaru Yamaguchi; Toshihiro Inami; Ko Ito; Kazutaka Kasai; Yasuhiro Tanimoto
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2012-06-05

6.  Using self-drilling screws in volar plate osteosynthesis for distal radius fractures: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Alexaner Synek; Lars Borgmann; Hannes Traxler; Wolfgang Huf; Ekkehard Euler; Yan Chevalier; Sebastian F Baumbach
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Arthroscopic Fixation of Symptomatic Meso-Type Os Acromiale: Technical Note.

Authors:  Quen Oak Tang; Sherif Elnikety
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2022-07-25

8.  Comparison of success rates of orthodontic mini-screws by the insertion method.

Authors:  Jung Suk Kim; Seong Hwan Choi; Sang Kwon Cha; Jang Han Kim; Hwa Jin Lee; Sang Seon Yeom; Chung Ju Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 9.  A Mini-review on the Effect of Mini-implants on Contemporary Orthodontic Science.

Authors:  Saeid Nosouhian; Mansour Rismanchian; Roya Sabzian; Elham Shadmehr; Hamid Badrian; Amin Davoudi
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015

10.  Primary stability of self-drilling and self-tapping mini-implant in tibia of diabetes-induced rabbits.

Authors:  Jea-Beom Park; Eun-Young Kim; Janghyun Paek; Yoon-Ah Kook; Do-Min Jeong; Il-Sik Cho; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2014-05-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.