Literature DB >> 1462614

Fecal incontinence: indications for repairing the anal sphincter.

F Penninckx1.   

Abstract

Incontinent patients should be comprehensively investigated by objective tests, especially manometry, continence tests, and electromyography. Manometry can be used to predict the functional outcome and to calibrate the sphincter repair. Pure anatomical defects of the anal and pelvic musculature deserve surgical correction with or without overlapping the muscle ends. If the repair is delayed it should be done after a 3 month interval. A protective colostomy has to be performed in complex cases and in cases with septic complications. Before closing the colostomy, the ano-rectal function should be assessed. Acceptable continence can be restored in the majority of the patients, the outcome depending on the extent of local defects and the severity of concomitant pelvic floor neuropathy. Skeletal muscle transposition remains an esoteric approach to be used only in selected patients; the implantation of a neuromuscular stimulator seems to be warranted. In the presence of important functional deficits, sphincter repair may create a situation where additional conservative measures become more effective. A post-anal repair may be considered 3-12 months after rectopexy or sphincter repair. Incontinence based on pure functional defects is initially treated conservatively. A post-anal repair may improve the situation in two thirds of the patients but fails to help those who need it most. Failure seems to be related to a continuing neuropathic process. A peri-anal prosthetic band implant may be a valuable alternative in such patients. A sigmoidostomy is a measure of last resort. The prevention of fecal incontinence is most important and concerns surgeons, obstetricians, and physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1462614     DOI: 10.1007/bf02066976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  53 in total

1.  A comparison between electromyography and anal endosonography in mapping external anal sphincter defects.

Authors:  P J Law; M A Kamm; C I Bartram
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Prospective study of the effects of postanal repair in neurogenic faecal incontinence.

Authors:  N R Womack; J F Morrison; N S Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Anal sphincter function after delivery: a prospective study in women with sphincter rupture and controls.

Authors:  K Haadem; J A Dahlström; G Lingman
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Implantation of artificial sphincter for anal incontinence. Report of five cases.

Authors:  J Christiansen; M Lorentzen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Delayed external sphincter repair for obstetric tear.

Authors:  S Laurberg; M Swash; M M Henry
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Complex anal fistulae.

Authors:  V W Fazio
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.806

7.  Psychiatric screening for patients with faecal incontinence or chronic constipation referred for surgical treatment.

Authors:  S E Fisher; K Breckon; H A Andrews; M R Keighley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  A new balloon-retaining test for evaluation of anorectal function in incontinent patients.

Authors:  F M Penninckx; B Lestár; R P Kerremans
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Follow-up evaluation of gracilis muscle transposition for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  M L Corman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Electrophysiologic and manometric assessment of failed postanal repair for anorectal incontinence.

Authors:  S J Snooks; M Swash; M Henry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  2 in total

1.  Anorectal physiology measurements are of no value in clinical practice. True or false?

Authors:  N J Carty; B Moran; C D Johnson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Anal incontinence-sphincter ani repair: indications, techniques, outcome.

Authors:  Susan Galandiuk; Leslie A Roth; Quincy J Greene
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 3.445

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.