Literature DB >> 33608619

Deep learning-based grading of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast histopathology images.

Suzanne C Wetstein1, Nikolas Stathonikos2, Josien P W Pluim3, Yujing J Heng4, Natalie D Ter Hoeve2, Celien P H Vreuls2, Paul J van Diest2, Mitko Veta3.   

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive breast cancer that can progress into invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Studies suggest DCIS is often overtreated since a considerable part of DCIS lesions may never progress into IDC. Lower grade lesions have a lower progression speed and risk, possibly allowing treatment de-escalation. However, studies show significant inter-observer variation in DCIS grading. Automated image analysis may provide an objective solution to address high subjectivity of DCIS grading by pathologists. In this study, we developed and evaluated a deep learning-based DCIS grading system. The system was developed using the consensus DCIS grade of three expert observers on a dataset of 1186 DCIS lesions from 59 patients. The inter-observer agreement, measured by quadratic weighted Cohen's kappa, was used to evaluate the system and compare its performance to that of expert observers. We present an analysis of the lesion-level and patient-level inter-observer agreement on an independent test set of 1001 lesions from 50 patients. The deep learning system (dl) achieved on average slightly higher inter-observer agreement to the three observers (o1, o2 and o3) (κo1,dl = 0.81, κo2,dl = 0.53 and κo3,dl = 0.40) than the observers amongst each other (κo1,o2 = 0.58, κo1,o3 = 0.50 and κo2,o3 = 0.42) at the lesion-level. At the patient-level, the deep learning system achieved similar agreement to the observers (κo1,dl = 0.77, κo2,dl = 0.75 and κo3,dl = 0.70) as the observers amongst each other (κo1,o2 = 0.77, κo1,o3 = 0.75 and κo2,o3 = 0.72). The deep learning system better reflected the grading spectrum of DCIS than two of the observers. In conclusion, we developed a deep learning-based DCIS grading system that achieved a performance similar to expert observers. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first automated system for the grading of DCIS that could assist pathologists by providing robust and reproducible second opinions on DCIS grade.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33608619      PMCID: PMC7985025          DOI: 10.1038/s41374-021-00540-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Invest        ISSN: 0023-6837            Impact factor:   5.662


  47 in total

1.  A critical appraisal of six modern classifications of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS): correlation with grade of associated invasive carcinoma.

Authors:  A G Douglas-Jones; S K Gupta; R L Attanoos; J M Morgan; R E Mansel
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Steven A Narod; Javaid Iqbal; Vasily Giannakeas; Victoria Sopik; Ping Sun
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Outcome of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ untreated after diagnostic biopsy: results from the Nurses' Health Study.

Authors:  Laura C Collins; Rulla M Tamimi; Heather J Baer; James L Connolly; Graham A Colditz; Stuart J Schnitt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Tumor characteristics as predictors of local recurrence after treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Tatyana Shamliyan; Beth A Virnig; Robert Kane
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Automated Grading of Gliomas using Deep Learning in Digital Pathology Images: A modular approach with ensemble of convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Mehmet Günhan Ertosun; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

6.  Using deep convolutional neural networks to identify and classify tumor-associated stroma in diagnostic breast biopsies.

Authors:  Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Maeve Mullooly; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Shaoqi Fan; Pamela M Vacek; Donald L Weaver; Sally Herschorn; Louise A Brinton; Bram van Ginneken; Nico Karssemeijer; Andrew H Beck; Gretchen L Gierach; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  HER2/neu and Ki-67 expression predict non-invasive recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  E Rakovitch; S Nofech-Mozes; W Hanna; S Narod; D Thiruchelvam; R Saskin; J Spayne; C Taylor; L Paszat
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Significant inter- and intra-laboratory variation in grading of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a nationwide study of 4901 patients in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Carmen van Dooijeweert; Paul J van Diest; Stefan M Willems; Chantal C H J Kuijpers; Lucy I H Overbeek; Ivette A G Deckers
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Automated Quantitative Measures of Terminal Duct Lobular Unit Involution and Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Rulla M Tamimi; Yujing J Heng; Kevin H Kensler; Emily Z F Liu; Suzanne C Wetstein; Allison M Onken; Christina I Luffman; Gabrielle M Baker; Laura C Collins; Stuart J Schnitt; Vanessa C Bret-Mounet; Mitko Veta; Josien P W Pluim; Ying Liu; Graham A Colditz; A Heather Eliassen; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Deep Learning for Whole Slide Image Analysis: An Overview.

Authors:  Neofytos Dimitriou; Ognjen Arandjelović; Peter D Caie
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-11-22
View more
  3 in total

1.  A deep learning model for breast ductal carcinoma in situ classification in whole slide images.

Authors:  Fahdi Kanavati; Shin Ichihara; Masayuki Tsuneki
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Automated Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Histology Images via Deep Learning.

Authors:  Bum-Joo Cho; Jeong-Won Kim; Jungkap Park; Gui-Young Kwon; Mineui Hong; Si-Hyong Jang; Heejin Bang; Gilhyang Kim; Sung-Taek Park
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-21

3.  Deep learning-based breast cancer grading and survival analysis on whole-slide histopathology images.

Authors:  Suzanne C Wetstein; Vincent M T de Jong; Nikolas Stathonikos; Mark Opdam; Gwen M H E Dackus; Josien P W Pluim; Paul J van Diest; Mitko Veta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.