Literature DB >> 35076741

A deep learning model for breast ductal carcinoma in situ classification in whole slide images.

Fahdi Kanavati1, Shin Ichihara2, Masayuki Tsuneki3.   

Abstract

The pathological differential diagnosis between breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) is of pivotal importance for determining optimum cancer treatment(s) and clinical outcomes. Since conventional diagnosis by pathologists using microscopes is limited in terms of human resources, it is necessary to develop new techniques that can rapidly and accurately diagnose large numbers of histopathological specimens. Computational pathology tools which can assist pathologists in detecting and classifying DCIS and IDC from whole slide images (WSIs) would be of great benefit for routine pathological diagnosis. In this paper, we trained deep learning models capable of classifying biopsy and surgical histopathological WSIs into DCIS, IDC, and benign. We evaluated the models on two independent test sets (n= 1382, n= 548), achieving ROC areas under the curves (AUCs) up to 0.960 and 0.977 for DCIS and IDC, respectively.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Invasive ductal carcinoma; Whole slide image

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35076741     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-021-03241-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  37 in total

1.  Mixed apocrine/endocrine ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast coexistent with lobular carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  J D Coyne; P A Dervan; L Barr; A D Baildam
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Radial scar without associated atypical epithelial proliferation on image-guided 14-gauge needle core biopsy: analysis of 49 cases from a single-centre and review of the literature.

Authors:  S Bianchi; E Giannotti; E Vanzi; M Marziali; D Abdulcadir; C Boeri; L Livi; L Orzalesi; L J Sanchez; T Susini; V Vezzosi; J Nori
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  Consistency in recognizing microinvasion in breast carcinomas is improved by immunohistochemistry for myoepithelial markers.

Authors:  G Cserni; C A Wells; H Kaya; P Regitnig; A Sapino; G Floris; T Decker; M P Foschini; P J van Diest; D Grabau; A Reiner; J DeGaetano; E Chmielik; A Cordoba; X Andreu; V Zolota; E Charafe-Jauffret; A Ryska; Z Varga; N Weingertner; J P Bellocq; I Liepniece-Karele; G Callagy; J Kulka; H Bürger; P Figueiredo; J Wesseling; I Amendoeira; D Faverly; C M Quinn; S Bianchi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Tailoring therapies--improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015.

Authors:  A S Coates; E P Winer; A Goldhirsch; R D Gelber; M Gnant; M Piccart-Gebhart; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of core biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ and its implications for surgical practice.

Authors:  M F Dillon; C M Quinn; E W McDermott; A O'Doherty; N O'Higgins; A D K Hill
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic core biopsy in a mammographic breast cancer screening programme.

Authors:  J E Dahlstrom; S Jain; T Sutton; S Sutton
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images.

Authors:  Gabriele Campanella; Matthew G Hanna; Luke Geneslaw; Allen Miraflor; Vitor Werneck Krauss Silva; Klaus J Busam; Edi Brogi; Victor E Reuter; David S Klimstra; Thomas J Fuchs
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Cause-specific Mortality in a Population-based Cohort of 9799 Women Treated for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Lotte E Elshof; Marjanka K Schmidt; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Flora E van Leeuwen; Jelle Wesseling; Michael Schaapveld
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Significant inter- and intra-laboratory variation in grading of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a nationwide study of 4901 patients in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Carmen van Dooijeweert; Paul J van Diest; Stefan M Willems; Chantal C H J Kuijpers; Lucy I H Overbeek; Ivette A G Deckers
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Classification and mutation prediction from non-small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning.

Authors:  Nicolas Coudray; Paolo Santiago Ocampo; Theodore Sakellaropoulos; Navneet Narula; Matija Snuderl; David Fenyö; Andre L Moreira; Narges Razavian; Aristotelis Tsirigos
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  2 in total

1.  Transfer Learning for Adenocarcinoma Classifications in the Transurethral Resection of Prostate Whole-Slide Images.

Authors:  Masayuki Tsuneki; Makoto Abe; Fahdi Kanavati
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  A Deep Learning Model for Prostate Adenocarcinoma Classification in Needle Biopsy Whole-Slide Images Using Transfer Learning.

Authors:  Masayuki Tsuneki; Makoto Abe; Fahdi Kanavati
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.