Literature DB >> 26291673

Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Steven A Narod1, Javaid Iqbal2, Vasily Giannakeas1, Victoria Sopik2, Ping Sun2.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), or stage 0 breast cancer, often experience a second primary breast cancer (DCIS or invasive), and some ultimately die of breast cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the 10- and 20-year mortality from breast cancer following a diagnosis of DCIS and to establish whether the mortality rate is influenced by age at diagnosis, ethnicity, and initial treatment received. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational study of women who received a diagnosis of DCIS from 1988 to 2011 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registries database. Age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, pathologic features, date of second primary breast cancer, cause of death, and survival were abstracted for 108,196 women. Their risk of dying of breast cancer was compared with that of women in the general population. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for death from DCIS by age at diagnosis, clinical features, ethnicity, and treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Ten- and 20-year breast cancer-specific mortality.
RESULTS: Among the 108 196 women with DCIS, the mean (range) age at diagnosis of DCIS was 53.8 (15-69) years and the mean (range) duration of follow-up was 7.5 (0-23.9) years. At 20 years, the breast cancer-specific mortality was 3.3% (95% CI, 3.0%-3.6%) overall and was higher for women who received a diagnosis before age 35 years compared with older women (7.8% vs 3.2%; HR, 2.58 [95% CI, 1.85-3.60]; P < .001) and for blacks compared with non-Hispanic whites (7.0% vs 3.0%; HR, 2.55 [95% CI, 2.17-3.01]; P < .001). The risk of dying of breast cancer increased after experience of an ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (HR, 18.1 [95% CI, 14.0-23.6]; P < .001). A total of 517 patients died of breast cancer following a DCIS diagnosis (mean follow-up, 7.5 [range, 0-23.9] years) without experiencing an in-breast invasive cancer prior to death. Among patients who received lumpectomy, radiotherapy was associated with a reduction in the risk of ipsilateral invasive recurrence at 10 years (2.5% vs 4.9%; adjusted HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.42-0.53]; P < .001) but not of breast cancer-specific mortality at 10 years (0.8% vs 0.9%; HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.67-1.10]; P = .22). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Important risk factors for death from breast cancer following a DCIS diagnosis include age at diagnosis and black ethnicity. The risk of death increases after a diagnosis of an ipsilateral second primary invasive breast cancer, but prevention of these recurrences by radiotherapy does not diminish breast cancer mortality at 10 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26291673     DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  168 in total

1.  Molecular biology: Marked progress.

Authors:  Hannah Hoag
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Patient-reported outcomes with anastrozole versus tamoxifen for postmenopausal patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with lumpectomy plus radiotherapy (NSABP B-35): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial.

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz; Reena S Cecchini; Thomas B Julian; Richard G Margolese; Joseph P Costantino; Laura A Vallow; Kathy S Albain; Patrick W Whitworth; Mary E Cianfrocca; Adam M Brufsky; Howard M Gross; Gamini S Soori; Judith O Hopkins; Louis Fehrenbacher; Keren Sturtz; Timothy F Wozniak; Thomas E Seay; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Has screening mammography become obsolete?

Authors:  M E Costanza
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Human Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: from the Eyes of a Beholder.

Authors:  Jason I Herschkowitz; Fariba Behbod
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.673

5.  Informing Women and Their Physicians about Recommendations for Adjunct Breast MRI Screening: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  John T Brinton; Lora D Barke; Mary E Freivogel; Tiffany C Talley; Michelle D Lexin; Alicia L Drew; Rachel B Beam; Deborah H Glueck
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2017-02-03

6.  Modeling Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS): An Overview of CISNET Model Approaches.

Authors:  Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Jeroen J van den Broek; Xiaoxue Li; Harald Weedon-Fekjær; Clyde B Schechter; Oguzhan Alagoz; Xuelin Huang; Donald L Weaver; Elizabeth S Burnside; Rinaa S Punglia; Harry J de Koning; Sandra J Lee
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 7.  Defining the Hallmarks of Metastasis.

Authors:  Danny R Welch; Douglas R Hurst
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Association of Preferences for Papillary Thyroid Cancer Treatment With Disease Terminology: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Brooke Nickel; Kirsten Howard; Juan P Brito; Alexandra Barratt; Ray Moynihan; Kirsten McCaffery
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 6.223

9.  Impact of Age on Risk of Recurrence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Outcomes of 2996 Women Treated with Breast-Conserving Surgery Over 30 Years.

Authors:  Patricia A Cronin; Cristina Olcese; Sujata Patil; Monica Morrow; Kimberly J Van Zee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Breast cancer: The importance of overdiagnosis in breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Steven Narod
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.