Literature DB >> 29899550

Using deep convolutional neural networks to identify and classify tumor-associated stroma in diagnostic breast biopsies.

Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi1,2, Maeve Mullooly3,4, Ruth M Pfeiffer3, Shaoqi Fan3, Pamela M Vacek5, Donald L Weaver6, Sally Herschorn7,8, Louise A Brinton3, Bram van Ginneken1, Nico Karssemeijer1, Andrew H Beck2,9, Gretchen L Gierach3, Jeroen A W M van der Laak10,11, Mark E Sherman12.   

Abstract

The breast stromal microenvironment is a pivotal factor in breast cancer development, growth and metastases. Although pathologists often detect morphologic changes in stroma by light microscopy, visual classification of such changes is subjective and non-quantitative, limiting its diagnostic utility. To gain insights into stromal changes associated with breast cancer, we applied automated machine learning techniques to digital images of 2387 hematoxylin and eosin stained tissue sections of benign and malignant image-guided breast biopsies performed to investigate mammographic abnormalities among 882 patients, ages 40-65 years, that were enrolled in the Breast Radiology Evaluation and Study of Tissues (BREAST) Stamp Project. Using deep convolutional neural networks, we trained an algorithm to discriminate between stroma surrounding invasive cancer and stroma from benign biopsies. In test sets (928 whole-slide images from 330 patients), this algorithm could distinguish biopsies diagnosed as invasive cancer from benign biopsies solely based on the stromal characteristics (area under the receiver operator characteristics curve = 0.962). Furthermore, without being trained specifically using ductal carcinoma in situ as an outcome, the algorithm detected tumor-associated stroma in greater amounts and at larger distances from grade 3 versus grade 1 ductal carcinoma in situ. Collectively, these results suggest that algorithms based on deep convolutional neural networks that evaluate only stroma may prove useful to classify breast biopsies and aid in understanding and evaluating the biology of breast lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29899550      PMCID: PMC6752036          DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0073-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  36 in total

1.  Machine learning-based image analysis for accelerating the diagnosis of complicated preneoplastic and neoplastic ductal lesions in breast biopsy tissues.

Authors:  Shinya Sato; Satoshi Maki; Takashi Yamanaka; Daisuke Hoshino; Yukihide Ota; Emi Yoshioka; Kae Kawachi; Kota Washimi; Masaki Suzuki; Yoichiro Ohkubo; Tomoyuki Yokose; Toshinari Yamashita; Seiji Ohtori; Yohei Miyagi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Reimagining T Staging Through Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Image Processing Approaches in Digital Pathology.

Authors:  Kaustav Bera; Ian Katz; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2020-11

3.  Deep Learning Based on Standard H&E Images of Primary Melanoma Tumors Identifies Patients at Risk for Visceral Recurrence and Death.

Authors:  Prathamesh M Kulkarni; Eric J Robinson; Jing Wang; Yvonne M Saenger; Jaya Sarin Pradhan; Robyn D Gartrell-Corrado; Bethany R Rohr; Megan H Trager; Larisa J Geskin; Harriet M Kluger; Pok Fai Wong; Balazs Acs; Emanuelle M Rizk; Chen Yang; Manas Mondal; Michael R Moore; Iman Osman; Robert Phelps; Basil A Horst; Zhe S Chen; Tammie Ferringer; David L Rimm
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Artificial Intelligence for Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Sherry Bhalla; Alessandro Laganà
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Melanoma Prognosis: Accuracy of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual Eighth Edition.

Authors:  Shirin Bajaj; Douglas Donnelly; Melissa Call; Paul Johannet; Una Moran; David Polsky; Richard Shapiro; Russell Berman; Anna Pavlick; Jeffrey Weber; Judy Zhong; Iman Osman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Image analysis and artificial intelligence in infectious disease diagnostics.

Authors:  K P Smith; J E Kirby
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2020-03-22       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence in digital pathology - new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology.

Authors:  Kaustav Bera; Kurt A Schalper; David L Rimm; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Deep Multi-Magnification Networks for multi-class breast cancer image segmentation.

Authors:  David Joon Ho; Dig V K Yarlagadda; Timothy M D'Alfonso; Matthew G Hanna; Anne Grabenstetter; Peter Ntiamoah; Edi Brogi; Lee K Tan; Thomas J Fuchs
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 9.  Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Research and Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Bhavneet Bhinder; Coryandar Gilvary; Neel S Madhukar; Olivier Elemento
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 38.272

10.  Quantitative Image Analysis for Tissue Biomarker Use: A White Paper From the Digital Pathology Association.

Authors:  Haydee Lara; Zaibo Li; Esther Abels; Famke Aeffner; Marilyn M Bui; Ehab A ElGabry; Cleopatra Kozlowski; Michael C Montalto; Anil V Parwani; Mark D Zarella; Douglas Bowman; David Rimm; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2021-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.