Literature DB >> 33606565

Recognizing and Minimizing Artifacts at Dual-Energy CT.

Anushri Parakh1, Chansik An1, Simon Lennartz1, Prabhakar Rajiah1, Benjamin M Yeh1, Frank J Simeone1, Dushyant V Sahani1, Avinash R Kambadakone1.   

Abstract

Dual-energy CT (DECT) is an exciting innovation in CT technology with profound capabilities to improve diagnosis and add value to patient care. Significant advances in this technology over the past decade have improved our ability to successfully adopt DECT into the clinical routine. To enable effective use of DECT, one must be aware of the pitfalls and artifacts related to this technology. Understanding the underlying technical basis of artifacts and the strategies to mitigate them requires optimization of scan protocols and parameters. The ability of radiologists and technologists to anticipate their occurrence and provide recommendations for proper selection of patients, intravenous and oral contrast media, and scan acquisition parameters is key to obtaining good-quality DECT images. In addition, choosing appropriate reconstruction algorithms such as image kernel, postprocessing parameters, and appropriate display settings is critical for preventing quantitative and qualitative interpretive errors. Therefore, knowledge of the appearances of these artifacts is essential to prevent errors and allows maximization of the potential of DECT. In this review article, the authors aim to provide a comprehensive and practical overview of possible artifacts that may be encountered at DECT across all currently available commercial clinical platforms. They also provide a pictorial overview of the diagnostic pitfalls and outline strategies for mitigating or preventing the occurrence of artifacts, when possible. The broadening scope of DECT applications necessitates up-to-date familiarity with these technologies to realize their full diagnostic potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33606565      PMCID: PMC7924411          DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021200049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  44 in total

Review 1.  Dual Energy Computed Tomography Scans of the Bowel: Benefits, Pitfalls, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Benjamin M Yeh; Markus M Obmann; Antonio C Westphalen; Michael A Ohliger; Judy Yee; Yuxin Sun; Zhen J Wang
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.

Authors:  Fasco van Ommen; Edwin Bennink; Alain Vlassenbroek; Jan Willem Dankbaar; Arnold M R Schilham; Max A Viergever; Hugo W A M de Jong
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Rapid kVp switching dual-energy CT in the assessment of urolithiasis in patients with large body habitus: preliminary observations on image quality and stone characterization.

Authors:  Hamed Kordbacheh; Vinit Baliyan; Pranit Singh; Brian H Eisner; Dushyant V Sahani; Avinash R Kambadakone
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-03

4.  Optimal window settings in single-source dual-energy computed tomography of the abdomen.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Noda; Satoshi Goshima; Kazuto Kozaka; Norihide Yoneda; Nozomi Mizuno; Akiko Kato; Keita Fujimoto; Yusuke Tsuji; Toshiharu Miyoshi; Hiroshi Kawada; Nobuyuki Kawai; Yukichi Tanahashi; Masayuki Matsuo
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance.

Authors:  Julia F Barrett; Nicholas Keat
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Axial Spondyloarthritis: Dual-Energy Virtual Noncalcium CT in the Detection of Bone Marrow Edema in the Sacroiliac Joints.

Authors:  Haijun Wu; Guangfeng Zhang; Lei Shi; Xiuhui Li; Min Chen; Xiaoyu Huang; Ximing Cao; Shaoheng Tan; Yang Cui; Changhong Liang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Dual- and Multi-Energy CT: Principles, Technical Approaches, and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Joel G Fletcher
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Bone marrow edema in traumatic vertebral compression fractures: Diagnostic accuracy of dual-layer detector CT using calcium suppressed images.

Authors:  Victor Neuhaus; Simon Lennartz; Nuran Abdullayev; Nils Große Hokamp; Nadav Shapira; Galit Kafri; Jasmin A Holz; Barbara Krug; Martin Hellmich; David Maintz; Jan Borggrefe
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Clinical Assessment of Metal Artifact Reduction Methods in Dual-Energy CT Examinations of Instrumented Spines.

Authors:  Zaiyang Long; David R DeLone; Amy L Kotsenas; Vance T Lehman; Alex A Nagelschneider; Gregory J Michalak; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough; Lifeng Yu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Effects of radiation dose levels and spectral iterative reconstruction levels on the accuracy of iodine quantification and virtual monochromatic CT numbers in dual-layer spectral detector CT: an iodine phantom study.

Authors:  Xiaomei Lu; Zaiming Lu; Jiandong Yin; Yuying Gao; Xingbiao Chen; Qiyong Guo
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-02
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Dual-energy CT in pulmonary vascular disease.

Authors:  Ioannis Vlahos; Megan C Jacobsen; Myrna C Godoy; Konstantinos Stefanidis; Rick R Layman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Recent Advancements in CT and MR Imaging of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Asha Daryanani; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 4.802

Review 3.  Improving radiation physics, tumor visualisation, and treatment quantification in radiotherapy with spectral or dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Matthijs Ferdinand Kruis
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.