Literature DB >> 30527306

Optimal window settings in single-source dual-energy computed tomography of the abdomen.

Yoshifumi Noda1, Satoshi Goshima2, Kazuto Kozaka3, Norihide Yoneda3, Nozomi Mizuno1, Akiko Kato1, Keita Fujimoto1, Yusuke Tsuji4, Toshiharu Miyoshi1, Hiroshi Kawada1, Nobuyuki Kawai1, Yukichi Tanahashi1, Masayuki Matsuo1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the optimal window settings for monochromatic images with various energy levels in single-source dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) of the abdomen.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred consecutive patients underwent contrast-enhanced DECT to screen tumor metastases and/or recurrences after surgery for malignant tumors. Two independent radiologists reviewed eight energy levels (40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, and 75 kilo-electron volts [keV]) of the portal venous phase monochromatic images. For each keV image, the radiologists adjusted the window level (WL) and width (WW) using settings of 40 HU of WL and 350 HU of WW on 65 keV images as a reference and recorded these values. After removing the top and bottom 5% of the data, the optimal WL and WW in each energy levels were obtained by rounding the median values. In 7 of 200 patients with a total of 23 liver metastases, the tumor-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated and compared among the energy levels.
RESULTS: The optimal WLs and WWs at each energy level were as follows: 40 keV, 140 and 680 HU; 45 keV, 110 and 570 HU; 50 keV, 90 and 490 HU; 55 keV, 70 and 440 HU; 60 keV, 60 and 390 HU; 65 keV, 40 and 350 HU; 70 keV, 30 and 320 HU; and 75 keV, and 20 and 300 HU. The best CNR was obtained using 65 keV images (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: We clarified the optimal WL and WW available for the preset window settings in abdominal DECT.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrast media; Iodine; Multidetector computed tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30527306     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  2 in total

Review 1.  Recognizing and Minimizing Artifacts at Dual-Energy CT.

Authors:  Anushri Parakh; Chansik An; Simon Lennartz; Prabhakar Rajiah; Benjamin M Yeh; Frank J Simeone; Dushyant V Sahani; Avinash R Kambadakone
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Advantages and disadvantages of single-source dual-energy whole-body CT angiography with 50% reduced iodine dose at 40 keV reconstruction.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Noda; Fumihiko Nakamura; Noriyuki Yasuda; Toshiharu Miyoshi; Nobuyuki Kawai; Hiroshi Kawada; Fuminori Hyodo; Masayuki Matsuo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.039

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.