Literature DB >> 33603153

Feral swine as sources of fecal contamination in recreational waters.

Anna M McKee1, Paul M Bradley2, David Shelley3, Shea McCarthy3,4, Marirosa Molina5.   

Abstract

Recreational waters are primary attractions at many national and state parks where feral swine populations are established, and thus are possible hotspots for visitor exposure to feral swine contaminants. Microbial source tracking (MST) was used to determine spatial and temporal patterns of fecal contamination in Congaree National Park (CONG) in South Carolina, U.S.A., which has an established population of feral swine and is a popular destination for water-based recreation. Water samples were collected between December 2017 and June 2019 from 18 surface water sites distributed throughout CONG. Host specific MST markers included human (HF183), swine (Pig2Bac), ruminant (Rum2Bac), cow (CowM3), chicken (CL), and a marker for shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC; stx2). Water samples were also screened for culturable Escherichia coli (E. coli) as part of a citizen science program. Neither the cow nor chicken MST markers were detected during the study. The human marker was predominantly detected at boundary sites or could be attributed to upstream sources. However, several detections within CONG without concurrent detections at upstream external sites suggested occasional internal contamination from humans. The swine marker was the most frequently detected of all MST markers, and was present at sites located both internal and external to the Park. Swine MST marker concentrations ≥ 43 gene copies/mL were associated with culturable E. coli concentrations greater than the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency beach action value for recreational waters. None of the MST markers showed a strong association with detection of the pathogenic marker (stx2). Limited information about the health risk from exposure to fecal contamination from non-human sources hampers interpretation of the human health implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33603153      PMCID: PMC7893155          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83798-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  18 in total

Review 1.  Enterococci in the environment.

Authors:  Muruleedhara N Byappanahalli; Meredith B Nevers; Asja Korajkic; Zachery R Staley; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Characterizing relationships among fecal indicator bacteria, microbial source tracking markers, and associated waterborne pathogen occurrence in stream water and sediments in a mixed land use watershed.

Authors:  J Kenneth Bradshaw; Blake J Snyder; Adelumola Oladeinde; David Spidle; Mark E Berrang; Richard J Meinersmann; Brian Oakley; Roy C Sidle; Kathleen Sullivan; Marirosa Molina
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 11.236

3.  Animal Visitation to Wild Pig ( Sus scrofa) Wallows and Implications for Disease Transmission.

Authors:  Kevin D Eckert; David A Keiter; James C Beasley
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 1.535

4.  Persistence of Bacteroides species populations in a river as measured by molecular and culture techniques.

Authors:  Elisenda Ballesté; Anicet R Blanch
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  The potential for beach sand to serve as a reservoir for Escherichia coli and the physical influences on cell die-off.

Authors:  L J Beversdorf; S M Bornstein-Forst; S L McLellan
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.772

6.  Persistence of PCR-detectable Bacteroides distasonis from human feces in river water.

Authors:  C A Kreader
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Microbial source tracking (MST) in Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area: Seasonal and precipitation trends in MST marker concentrations, and associations with E. coli levels, pathogenic marker presence, and land use.

Authors:  By Anna McKee; Marirosa Molina; Mike Cyterski; Ann Couch
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 11.236

8.  Escherichia coli O157:H7 in feral swine near spinach fields and cattle, central California coast.

Authors:  Michele T Jay; Michael Cooley; Diana Carychao; Gerald W Wiscomb; Richard A Sweitzer; Leta Crawford-Miksza; Jeff A Farrar; David K Lau; Janice O'Connell; Anne Millington; Roderick V Asmundson; Edward R Atwill; Robert E Mandrell
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Modeling and mapping the probability of occurrence of invasive wild pigs across the contiguous United States.

Authors:  Meredith L McClure; Christopher L Burdett; Matthew L Farnsworth; Mark W Lutman; David M Theobald; Philip D Riggs; Daniel A Grear; Ryan S Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evidence for occurrence, persistence, and growth potential of Escherichia coli and enterococci in Hawaii's soil environments.

Authors:  Muruleedhara N Byappanahalli; Bruce M Roll; Roger S Fujioka
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  1 in total

1.  Use of metagenomic microbial source tracking to investigate the source of a foodborne outbreak of cryptosporidiosis.

Authors:  J Ahlinder; A-L Svedberg; A Nystedt; R Dryselius; K Jacobsson; M Hägglund; B Brindefalk; M Forsman; J Ottoson; K Troell
Journal:  Food Waterborne Parasitol       Date:  2021-12-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.