Literature DB >> 27295624

Characterizing relationships among fecal indicator bacteria, microbial source tracking markers, and associated waterborne pathogen occurrence in stream water and sediments in a mixed land use watershed.

J Kenneth Bradshaw1, Blake J Snyder1, Adelumola Oladeinde2, David Spidle2, Mark E Berrang3, Richard J Meinersmann3, Brian Oakley4, Roy C Sidle5, Kathleen Sullivan2, Marirosa Molina6.   

Abstract

Bed sediments of streams and rivers may store high concentrations of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) and pathogens. Due to resuspension events, these contaminants can be mobilized into the water column and affect overall water quality. Other bacterial indicators such as microbial source tracking (MST) markers, developed to determine potential sources of fecal contamination, can also be resuspended from bed sediments. The primary objective of this study was to predict occurrence of waterborne pathogens in water and streambed sediments using a simple statistical model that includes traditionally measured FIB, environmental parameters and source allocation, using MST markers as predictor variables. Synoptic sampling events were conducted during baseflow conditions downstream from agricultural (AG), forested (FORS), and wastewater pollution control plant (WPCP) land uses. Concentrations of FIB and MST markers were measured in water and sediments, along with occurrences of the enteric pathogens Campylobacter, Listeria and Salmonella, and the virulence gene that carries Shiga toxin, stx2. Pathogens were detected in water more often than in underlying sediments. Shiga toxin was significantly related to land use, with concentrations of the ruminant marker selected as an independent variable that could correctly classify 76% and 64% of observed Shiga toxin occurrences in water and sediment, respectively. FIB concentrations and water quality parameters were also selected as independent variables that correctly classified Shiga toxin occurrences in water and sediment (54%-87%), and Salmonella occurrences in water (96%). Relationships between pathogens and indicator variables were generally inconsistent and no single indicator adequately described occurrence of all pathogens. Because of inconsistent relationships between individual pathogens and FIB/MST markers, incorporating a combination of FIB, water quality measurements, and MST markers may be the best way to assess microbial water quality in mixed land use systems. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fecal indicator bacteria; Microbial source tracking markers; Recursive partitioning; Sediment; Waterborne pathogens

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27295624     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  25 in total

1.  Elucidating Waterborne Pathogen Presence and Aiding Source Apportionment in an Impaired Stream.

Authors:  Jennifer Weidhaas; Angela Anderson; Rubayat Jamal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Non-potable use of Lisbon underground water: microbiological and hydrochemical data from a 4-year case study.

Authors:  Pedro Teixeira; Luís Almeida; João Brandão; Sílvia Costa; Susana Pereira; Elisabete Valério
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Significance of beach geomorphology on fecal indicator bacteria levels.

Authors:  Allison Donahue; Zhixuan Feng; Elizabeth Kelly; Ad Reniers; Helena M Solo-Gabriele
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.553

4.  Evaluation of the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) for simulating E. coli concentrations at the watershed-scale.

Authors:  Robert A Sowah; Kenneth Bradshaw; Blake Snyder; David Spidle; Marirosa Molina
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Interpretability Versus Accuracy: A Comparison of Machine Learning Models Built Using Different Algorithms, Performance Measures, and Features to Predict E. coli Levels in Agricultural Water.

Authors:  Daniel L Weller; Tanzy M T Love; Martin Wiedmann
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2021-05-14

6.  Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli and Enterococcal Isolates From Irrigation Return Flows in a High-Desert Watershed.

Authors:  Robert S Dungan; David L Bjorneberg
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Microbial source tracking (MST) in Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area: Seasonal and precipitation trends in MST marker concentrations, and associations with E. coli levels, pathogenic marker presence, and land use.

Authors:  By Anna McKee; Marirosa Molina; Mike Cyterski; Ann Couch
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 8.  Fecal sludge management in developing urban centers: a review on the collection, treatment, and composting.

Authors:  Emmanuel Alepu Odey; Zifu Li; Xiaoqin Zhou; Loissi Kalakodio
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 5.190

9.  Small Produce Farm Environments Can Harbor Diverse Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria spp. Populations.

Authors:  Alexandra Belias; Laura K Strawn; Martin Wiedmann; Daniel Weller
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.077

10.  Pathogen and Surrogate Survival in Relation to Fecal Indicator Bacteria in Freshwater Mesocosms.

Authors:  Christopher A Baker; Giselle Almeida; Jung Ae Lee; Kristen E Gibson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.