Literature DB >> 23204362

Enterococci in the environment.

Muruleedhara N Byappanahalli1, Meredith B Nevers, Asja Korajkic, Zachery R Staley, Valerie J Harwood.   

Abstract

Enterococci are common, commensal members of gut communities in mammals and birds, yet they are also opportunistic pathogens that cause millions of human and animal infections annually. Because they are shed in human and animal feces, are readily culturable, and predict human health risks from exposure to polluted recreational waters, they are used as surrogates for waterborne pathogens and as fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in research and in water quality testing throughout the world. Evidence from several decades of research demonstrates, however, that enterococci may be present in high densities in the absence of obvious fecal sources and that environmental reservoirs of these FIB are important sources and sinks, with the potential to impact water quality. This review focuses on the distribution and microbial ecology of enterococci in environmental (secondary) habitats, including the effect of environmental stressors; an outline of their known and apparent sources, sinks, and fluxes; and an overview of the use of enterococci as FIB. Finally, the significance of emerging methodologies, such as microbial source tracking (MST) and empirical predictive models, as tools in water quality monitoring is addressed. The mounting evidence for widespread extraenteric sources and reservoirs of enterococci demonstrates the versatility of the genus Enterococcus and argues for the necessity of a better understanding of their ecology in natural environments, as well as their roles as opportunistic pathogens and indicators of human pathogens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23204362      PMCID: PMC3510518          DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00023-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev        ISSN: 1092-2172            Impact factor:   11.056


  284 in total

1.  Multilocus sequence typing scheme for Enterococcus faecalis reveals hospital-adapted genetic complexes in a background of high rates of recombination.

Authors:  Patricia Ruiz-Garbajosa; Marc J M Bonten; D Ashley Robinson; Janetta Top; Sreedhar R Nallapareddy; Carmen Torres; Teresa M Coque; Rafael Cantón; Fernando Baquero; Barbara E Murray; Rosa del Campo; Rob J L Willems
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Indicator organisms associated with stormwater suspended particles and estuarine sediment.

Authors:  Hueiwang C Jeng; Andrew J England; Henry B Bradford
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.269

3.  Comparison of genetic epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates from humans and poultry.

Authors:  Jeong-Ok Cha; Young-Hee Jung; Ha Rim Lee; Jae Il Yoo; Yeong Seon Lee
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Assessing pathogen risk to swimmers at non-sewage impacted recreational beaches.

Authors:  Mary E Schoen; Nicholas J Ashbolt
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  The survival of bacteria exposed to desiccation on surfaces associated with farm buildings.

Authors:  M J Bale; P M Bennett; J E Beringer; M Hinton
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1993-12

6.  Comparison of ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for subspecies differentiation of strains of Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  M E Gordillo; K V Singh; B E Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Salmonella rarely detected in Mississippi coastal waters and sediment.

Authors:  M R Carr; S Y Wang; T I McLean; C J Flood; R D Ellender
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  Environmental occurrence of the enterococcal surface protein (esp) gene is an unreliable indicator of human fecal contamination.

Authors:  Muruleedhara N Byappanahalli; Katarzyna Przybyla-Kelly; Dawn A Shively; Richard L Whitman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Phylogenetic diversity and molecular detection of bacteria in gull feces.

Authors:  Jingrang Lu; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Regina Lamendella; Thomas Edge; Stephen Hill
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 10.  Do U.S. Environmental Protection Agency water quality guidelines for recreational waters prevent gastrointestinal illness? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Timothy J Wade; Nitika Pai; Joseph N S Eisenberg; John M Colford
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  108 in total

1.  Occurrence of Host-Associated Fecal Markers on Child Hands, Household Soil, and Drinking Water in Rural Bangladeshi Households.

Authors:  Alexandria B Boehm; Dan Wang; Ayse Ercumen; Meghan Shea; Angela R Harris; Orin C Shanks; Catherine Kelty; Alvee Ahmed; Zahid Hayat Mahmud; Benjamin F Arnold; Claire Chase; Craig Kullmann; John M Colford; Stephen P Luby; Amy J Pickering
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol Lett       Date:  2016-11-08

2.  Poikilothermic Animals as a Previously Unrecognized Source of Fecal Indicator Bacteria in a Backwater Ecosystem of a Large River.

Authors:  Christina Frick; Julia Vierheilig; Rita Linke; Domenico Savio; Horst Zornig; Roswitha Antensteiner; Christian Baumgartner; Christian Bucher; Alfred P Blaschke; Julia Derx; Alexander K T Kirschner; Gabriela Ryzinska-Paier; René Mayer; Dagmar Seidl; Theodossia Nadiotis-Tsaka; Regina Sommer; Andreas H Farnleitner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  A predictive model for microbial counts on beaches where intertidal sand is the primary source.

Authors:  Zhixuan Feng; Ad Reniers; Brian K Haus; Helena M Solo-Gabriele; John D Wang; Lora E Fleming
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.553

4.  Microbes in Beach Sands: Integrating Environment, Ecology and Public Health.

Authors:  Richard Whitman; Valerie J Harwood; Thomas A Edge; Meredith Nevers; Muruleedhara Byappanahalli; Kannappan Vijayavel; João Brandão; Michael J Sadowsky; Elizabeth Wheeler Alm; Allan Crowe; Donna Ferguson; Zhongfu Ge; Elizabeth Halliday; Julie Kinzelman; Greg Kleinheinz; Kasia Przybyla-Kelly; Christopher Staley; Zachery Staley; Helena M Solo-Gabriele
Journal:  Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 8.044

5.  Simultaneous quantification of multiple food- and waterborne pathogens by use of microfluidic quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Satoshi Ishii; Takahiro Segawa; Satoshi Okabe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Spatial and temporal variation in enterococcal abundance and its relationship to the microbial community in Hawaii beach sand and water.

Authors:  Henglin Cui; Kun Yang; Eulyn Pagaling; Tao Yan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Incorporation of exogenous fatty acids protects Enterococcus faecalis from membrane-damaging agents.

Authors:  Holly E Saito; John R Harp; Elizabeth M Fozo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Enrichment of stream water with fecal indicator organisms during baseflow periods.

Authors:  Yakov Pachepsky; Matthew Stocker; Manuel Olmeda Saldaña; Daniel Shelton
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Occurrence, genetic diversity, and persistence of enterococci in a Lake Superior watershed.

Authors:  Qinghong Ran; Brian D Badgley; Nicholas Dillon; Gary M Dunny; Michael J Sadowsky
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Distribution of genetic markers of fecal pollution on a freshwater sandy shoreline in proximity to wastewater effluent.

Authors:  Jessica J Eichmiller; Randall E Hicks; Michael J Sadowsky
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.