Literature DB >> 17448172

The potential for beach sand to serve as a reservoir for Escherichia coli and the physical influences on cell die-off.

L J Beversdorf1, S M Bornstein-Forst, S L McLellan.   

Abstract

AIMS: The Escherichia coli burden at a Great Lakes urban beach was evaluated during the summer months to determine if sand served as a reservoir for E. coli, and if there was evidence of cell replication in situ. Field and laboratory studies investigated the effects of moisture, temperature and UV on E. coli densities in the sand. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Sand samples (n = 481) were collected across three distinct transects of the beach, the top, a middle streamline, and the berm, over 15 sample days. The highest levels were found in the middle streamline, which was affected by stormwater discharge from nearby outfalls and roosting gulls; daily geometric mean levels of these seven sites ranged from 6700 to 40,900 CFU per 100 g of sand. Escherichia coli levels were greatest in samples with moisture levels between 15% and 19%, and were significantly higher than 0-4 and 20-24% ranges (P < 0.05). Pre- and post-rain samples at the beach demonstrated an increase in E. coli levels nearly 100-fold within 30 min, suggesting sand washout as a major mechanism for loading of E. coli into the beach waters. Rep PCR analysis of 160 isolates obtained from eight sites demonstrated that 21% of the isolates fell into one of the six clonal patterns, suggesting that bacteria may be able to replicate and possibly colonize beach sand. Sand field plots inoculated with E. coli cells containing pGFPuv that expresses GFP (green fluorescent protein) as a marker showed an initial two- to 100-fold increase at 24 h, depending on the temperature condition. The sand appeared to provide considerable protection from UV exposure as no significant difference was seen in cell densities within the first 2-4 cm of sand between exposed and unexposed plots (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Beach sand may act as a reservoir for E. coli. Replication of cells appears to be one possible contributing factor to the persistently high levels, as indicated by both field studies and laboratory studies, and warrants further investigation. Moisture content of sand may also be a determinant of cell persistence in the sand environment. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Escherichia coli is used as an indicator organism for faecal pollution at most Great Lakes coastal beaches; therefore, a better understanding of how E. coli might survive, or possibly replicate, in the environment would improve interpretation of beach monitoring results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17448172     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03177.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  31 in total

1.  Water quality, weather and environmental factors associated with fecal indicator organism density in beach sand at two recreational marine beaches.

Authors:  Christopher D Heaney; Natalie G Exum; Alfred P Dufour; Kristen P Brenner; Richard A Haugland; Eunice Chern; Kellogg J Schwab; David C Love; Marc L Serre; Rachel Noble; Timothy J Wade
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Microarray analysis of Escherichia coli strains from interstitial beach waters of Lake Huron (Canada).

Authors:  T Kon; S C Weir; J T Trevors; H Lee; J Champagne; L Meunier; R Brousseau; L Masson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Relative decay of Bacteroidales microbial source tracking markers and cultivated Escherichia coli in freshwater microcosms.

Authors:  Linda K Dick; Erin A Stelzer; Erin E Bertke; Denise L Fong; Donald M Stoeckel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Influence of Land Use, Nutrients, and Geography on Microbial Communities and Fecal Indicator Abundance at Lake Michigan Beaches.

Authors:  Danielle D Cloutier; Elizabeth W Alm; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Microbes in Beach Sands: Integrating Environment, Ecology and Public Health.

Authors:  Richard Whitman; Valerie J Harwood; Thomas A Edge; Meredith Nevers; Muruleedhara Byappanahalli; Kannappan Vijayavel; João Brandão; Michael J Sadowsky; Elizabeth Wheeler Alm; Allan Crowe; Donna Ferguson; Zhongfu Ge; Elizabeth Halliday; Julie Kinzelman; Greg Kleinheinz; Kasia Przybyla-Kelly; Christopher Staley; Zachery Staley; Helena M Solo-Gabriele
Journal:  Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 8.044

6.  Phenotypic diversity caused by differential RpoS activity among environmental Escherichia coli isolates.

Authors:  Sarah M Chiang; Tao Dong; Thomas A Edge; Herb E Schellhorn
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Impact of erosion and accretion on the distribution of enterococci in beach sands.

Authors:  Rebecca J Gast; Levi Gorrell; Britt Raubenheimer; Steve Elgar
Journal:  Cont Shelf Res       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 2.391

8.  Microbial release from seeded beach sediments during wave conditions.

Authors:  Matthew C Phillips; Zhixuan Feng; Laura J Vogel; Ad J H M Reniers; Brian K Haus; Amber A Enns; Yifan Zhang; David B Hernandez; Helena M Solo-Gabriele
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 5.553

9.  Presence of pathogens and indicator microbes at a non-point source subtropical recreational marine beach.

Authors:  Amir M Abdelzaher; Mary E Wright; Cristina Ortega; Helena M Solo-Gabriele; Gary Miller; Samir Elmir; Xihui Newman; Peter Shih; J Alfredo Bonilla; Tonya D Bonilla; Carol J Palmer; Troy Scott; Jerzy Lukasik; Valerie J Harwood; Shannon McQuaig; Chris Sinigalliano; Maribeth Gidley; Lisa R W Plano; Xiaofang Zhu; John D Wang; Lora E Fleming
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Distribution of genetic markers of fecal pollution on a freshwater sandy shoreline in proximity to wastewater effluent.

Authors:  Jessica J Eichmiller; Randall E Hicks; Michael J Sadowsky
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.