Literature DB >> 33602951

Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions.

Kuan-Ju Huang1, Kuan-Ting Lin1, Chin-Jui Wu2, Ying-Xuan Li1, Wen-Chun Chang1, Bor-Ching Sheu3.   

Abstract

Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has emerged as least invasive interventions for gynecologic disease. However, SILS is slow to gain in popularity due to difficulties in triangulation and instrument crowding. Besides, the costly instruments may influence patients' will to have this procedure, and limit other medical expense as well. To optimize outcome and reduce cost, the objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety for patients undergoing adnexal surgeries using conventional laparoscopic instruments with SILS (SILS-C), and to compare with those of patients subject to TP using conventional laparoscopic instruments (TP-C). This is a retrospective case-control study. The data dated from April 2011 to April 2018. Patients who received concomitant multiple surgeries, were diagnosed with suspected advanced stage ovarian malignancy, or required frozen sections for intraoperative pathologic diagnosis were excluded. Demographic data, including the age, body weight, height, previous abdominal surgery were obtained. The surgical outcomes were compared using conventional statistical methods. 259 patients received SILS-C. The operating time was 63.83 ± 25.31 min. Blood loss was 2.38 ± 6.09 c.c. 58 patients (24.38%) needed addition of port to complete surgery. 384 patients received TP-C. Compared with SILS-C, the operating time was shorter (57.32 ± 26.38 min, OR = 0.984, CI = 0.975-0.992). The patients were further divided into unilateral or bilateral adnexectomy, and unilateral or bilateral cystectomy. Other than the operating time in unilateral cystectomy (66.12 ± 19.5 vs. 58.27 ± 23.92 min, p = .002), no statistical differences were observed in the subgroup analysis. Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments is feasible and safe as initial approach to adnexal lesions. In complex setting as unilateral cystectomy or pelvic adhesions, two-port access may be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33602951      PMCID: PMC7892849          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82204-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  25 in total

1.  Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy using conventional instruments: an initial experience using a novel technique.

Authors:  Connie G Chiu; Nam H Nguyen; Scott W Bloom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery: comparison of surgical port performance in a surgical simulator with novices.

Authors:  Bernadette Brown-Clerk; Adam E de Laveaga; Chad A LaGrange; Laura M Wirth; Bethany R Lowndes; M Susan Hallbeck
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Does single-port laparoscopic surgery reduce postoperative pain in women with benign gynecologic disease?

Authors:  Jeong Min Eom; Joong Sub Choi; Won Joon Choi; Yun Hong Kim; Jung Hun Lee
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 1.878

4.  Pre-bent instruments used in single-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery: comparative study of performance in a dry lab.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Miernik; Martin Schoenthaler; Kerstin Lilienthal; Alexander Frankenschmidt; Wojciech Konrad Karcz; Simon Kuesters
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Prospective comparison of single port versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Min Kyung Kim; Jeong Jin Kim; Joong Sub Choi; Jeong Min Eom; Jung Hun Lee
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  Single-port (OctoPort) assisted extracorporeal ovarian cystectomy for the treatment of large ovarian cysts: compare to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy.

Authors:  Gun Oh Chong; Dae Gy Hong; Yoon Soon Lee
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (NAOC vs. LOC): a case-matched study.

Authors:  Chin-Jung Wang; Pei-Yin Wu; Hsin-Hong Kuo; Hsing-Tse Yu; Chen-Ying Huang; Hsiao-Tseng Tseng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian dermoid cysts.

Authors:  Ben-Shian Huang; Peng-Hui Wang; Hsiao-Wen Tsai; Teh-Fu Hsu; Ming-Shyen Yen; Yi-Jen Chen
Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.705

9.  Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) surgery in benign gynecology: perioperative and late complications of 515 cases.

Authors:  Jin-Young Park; Tae-Joong Kim; Hyo-Jeong Kang; Yoo-young Lee; Chel Hun Choi; Jeong-Won Lee; Duk-Soo Bae; Byoung-Gie Kim
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  Single-port laparoscopic surgery for benign salpingo-ovarian pathology: a single-center experience from Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ismail A Al-Badawi; Osama AlOmar; Naryman Albadawi; Ahmed Abu-Zaid
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 1.526

View more
  2 in total

1.  Paratubal Cystectomy in a Pregnant Woman Using the Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Technique.

Authors:  Luke William Nelson; Elliot MacKenzie
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-07-14

2.  Effect of Two-Port Laparoscopic Surgery on Pregnancy Outcomes of Patients with Concurrent Adnexal Masses.

Authors:  Ying-Xuan Li; Mu-En Ko; Ching Hsu; Kuan-Ju Huang; Bor-Ching Sheu; Wen-Chun Chang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.