Literature DB >> 25345854

Prospective comparison of single port versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy.

Min Kyung Kim1, Jeong Jin Kim, Joong Sub Choi, Jeong Min Eom, Jung Hun Lee.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the feasibility and safety of single port laparoscopic surgery (SP-LS) for ectopic pregnancy, irrespective of type of ectopic pregnancy and hemodynamic stability.
METHODS: A prospective case-control study of 106 women who underwent SP-LS or conventional LS for a suspected ectopic pregnancy was performed at a university teaching hospital from January 2009 to March 2012. Twenty-six women underwent SP-LS (SP-LS group) and 80 women underwent conventional LS (conventional LS group).
RESULTS: There were no statistical differences between the groups in terms of demographic characteristics, operating time, hemoglobin change, return of bowel activity, hospital stay or complication rate. There were no cases of additional trocar use or conversion to laparotomy. Of five women with heterotopic pregnancy, one underwent SP-LS, and three underwent conventional LS for tubal pregnancy, which all resulted in vaginal delivery without obstetric complication; one woman received SP-LS for cornual pregnancy and had an ongoing pregnancy.
CONCLUSION: SP-LS for ectopic pregnancy is feasible and safe regardless of the type of ectopic pregnancy and hemodynamic stability. However, further work is needed to confirm this conclusion and to demonstrate any advantage of SP-LS for ectopic pregnancy.
© 2014 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research © 2014 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ectopic pregnancy; gynecology; laparoscopy; single port surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25345854     DOI: 10.1111/jog.12595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  6 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Management of Interstitial Ectopic Using Simple and Safe Technique: Case Series and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Tamer Hanafy Said
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-03-18

2.  Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions.

Authors:  Kuan-Ju Huang; Kuan-Ting Lin; Chin-Jui Wu; Ying-Xuan Li; Wen-Chun Chang; Bor-Ching Sheu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Management of interstitial pregnancy in the era of laparoscopy: a meta-analysis of 855 case studies compared with traditional techniques.

Authors:  Greg Marchand; Ahmed Taher Masoud; Anthony Galitsky; Ali Azadi; Kelly Ware; Janelle Vallejo; Sienna Anderson; Alexa King; Stacy Ruther; Giovanna Brazil; Kaitlynne Cieminski; Sophia Hopewell; Kaitlyn Eberhardt; Katelyn Sainz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2021-02-04

4.  Effect of laparoscopy by single-port endoscopic access in benign adnexal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Andy Schmitt; Patrice Crochet; Karine Baumstark; Claire Tourette; Sabine Poizac; Audrey Pivano; Léon Boubli; Ludovic Cravello; Aubert Agostini
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Single-port laparoscopic neosalpingostomy for hydrosalpinx.

Authors:  Jin-Sung Yuk; Kye Hyun Kim; Ji Kwon Park; Jung Hun Lee
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2017-04-11

6.  Uterine manipulator requirement in laparoscopic surgery of Ectopic Pregnancy.

Authors:  Emrah Beyan; Ahkam Goksel Kanmaz; Adnan Budak; Volkan Emirdar; Sadettin Oguzhan Tutar; Abdurrahman Hamdi Inan
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.