Gun Oh Chong1, Dae Gy Hong1, Yoon Soon Lee2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea. Electronic address: yslee@knu.ac.kr.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate single-port assisted extracorporeal cystectomy for treatment of large ovarian cysts and to compare its surgical outcomes, complications, and cystic content spillage rates with those of conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy. DESIGN: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-five patients who underwent single-port assisted extracorporeal cystectomy (group 1), 33 patients who underwent conventional laparoscopy (group 2), and 25 patients who underwent laparotomy (group 3). INTERVENTIONS: Surgical outcomes, complications, and spillage rates in group 1 were compared with those in groups 2 and 3. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients characteristics and tumor histologic findings were similar in the 3 groups. The mean (SD) largest diameter of ovarian cysts was 11.4 (4.2) cm in group 1, 9.7 (2.3) cm in group 2, and 12.0 (3.4) cm in group 3. Operative time in groups 1 and 2 was similar at 69.3 (26.3) minutes vs 73.1 (36.3) minutes (p = .66); however, operative time in group 1 was shorter than in group 3, at 69.3 (26.3) minutes vs 87.5 (26.6) minutes (p =.02). Blood loss in group 1 was significantly lower than in groups 2 and 3, at 16.0 (19.4) mL vs 36.1 (20.7) mL (p < .001) and 16.0 (19.4) mL vs 42.2 (39.7) mL (p = .005). The spillage rate in group 1 was profoundly lower than in group 2, at 8.0% vs 69.7% (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Single-port assisted extracorporeal cystectomy offers an alternative to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for management of large ovarian cysts, with comparable surgical outcomes. Furthermore, cyst content spillage rate in single-port assisted extracorporeal cystectomy was remarkably lower than that in conventional laparoscopy.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate single-port assisted extracorporeal cystectomy for treatment of large ovarian cysts and to compare its surgical outcomes, complications, and cystic content spillage rates with those of conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy. DESIGN: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-five patients who underwent single-port assisted extracorporeal cystectomy (group 1), 33 patients who underwent conventional laparoscopy (group 2), and 25 patients who underwent laparotomy (group 3). INTERVENTIONS: Surgical outcomes, complications, and spillage rates in group 1 were compared with those in groups 2 and 3. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Patients characteristics and tumor histologic findings were similar in the 3 groups. The mean (SD) largest diameter of ovarian cysts was 11.4 (4.2) cm in group 1, 9.7 (2.3) cm in group 2, and 12.0 (3.4) cm in group 3. Operative time in groups 1 and 2 was similar at 69.3 (26.3) minutes vs 73.1 (36.3) minutes (p = .66); however, operative time in group 1 was shorter than in group 3, at 69.3 (26.3) minutes vs 87.5 (26.6) minutes (p =.02). Blood loss in group 1 was significantly lower than in groups 2 and 3, at 16.0 (19.4) mL vs 36.1 (20.7) mL (p < .001) and 16.0 (19.4) mL vs 42.2 (39.7) mL (p = .005). The spillage rate in group 1 was profoundly lower than in group 2, at 8.0% vs 69.7% (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Single-port assisted extracorporeal cystectomy offers an alternative to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for management of large ovarian cysts, with comparable surgical outcomes. Furthermore, cyst content spillage rate in single-port assisted extracorporeal cystectomy was remarkably lower than that in conventional laparoscopy.
Authors: Mohamed F Shaltout; Ahmed M Maged; Rana Abdella; Mona M Sediek; Sherif Dahab; Moutaz M Elsherbini; Rasha O Elkomy; Sherif Sameh Zaki Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 2.742
Authors: Jun-Hyeok Kang; Joseph J Noh; Soo Young Jeong; Jung In Shim; Yoo-Young Lee; Chel Hun Choi; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae; Hyun-Soo Kim; Tae-Joong Kim Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Jeong Sook Kim; In Ok Lee; Kyung Jin Eoh; Young Shin Chung; Inha Lee; Jung-Yun Lee; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Young Tae Kim; Sang Wun Kim Journal: Obstet Gynecol Sci Date: 2017-03-16