Literature DB >> 24083850

Does single-port laparoscopic surgery reduce postoperative pain in women with benign gynecologic disease?

Jeong Min Eom1, Joong Sub Choi, Won Joon Choi, Yun Hong Kim, Jung Hun Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reduced postoperative pain, one of the potential benefits of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SP-LS), has clinically significant importance. The objectives of this study are to compare postoperative pain between SP-LS and conventional laparoscopic surgery (conventional-LS) and to evaluate the difference in postoperative pain between the SP-LS group and the conventional-LS group based on whether a hysterectomy was performed. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective case-control study among women who underwent SP-LS (n=116) and conventional-LS (n=283) for benign gynecologic disease. We evaluated postoperative pain with a visual analog scale for pain score and the requirement for additional analgesics at 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery.
RESULTS: The pain score was significantly lower in the SP-LS group compared with the conventional-LS group only at 2 hours after surgery (5.70 ± 2.33 compared with 6.38 ± 2.13, P=.005). However, at all assessment times (2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours) after surgery including a hysterectomy (n=188) and all assessment times except 2 hours after surgery that did not include a hysterectomy (n=211), there were no differences in pain score when comparing the SP-LS or conventional-LS groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Single-port laparoscopy had no effect on postoperative pain except in the immediate postoperative state (2 hours following surgery) in women who underwent surgery that did not include a hysterectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24083850     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2013.0184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  6 in total

1.  Quality of life after single-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic disease.

Authors:  Jeong Min Eom; Kye Hyun Kim; Jin-Sung Yuk; Sung Il Roh; Jung Hun Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Outcome of Gynecologic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery with a Homemade Device and Conventional Laparoscopic Instruments in a Chinese Teaching Hospital.

Authors:  Xianghui Su; Xiaolong Jin; Canliang Wen; Qiong Xu; Chunfang Cai; Zhuohui Zhong; Xiang Tang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Robotic single-site versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a propensity score matching study.

Authors:  Jiheum Paek; Jung-Dong Lee; Tae Wook Kong; Suk-Joon Chang; Hee-Sug Ryu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Evelien M Sandberg; Claire F la Chapelle; Marjolein M van den Tweel; Jan W Schoones; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions.

Authors:  Kuan-Ju Huang; Kuan-Ting Lin; Chin-Jui Wu; Ying-Xuan Li; Wen-Chun Chang; Bor-Ching Sheu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Conventional versus single-incision laparoscopy for the surgical treatment of ovarian torsion.

Authors:  Murat Gozukucuk; Yetkin Karasu; Sena Münire Kaya; Erhan Yangır; Yusuf Üstün
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.